Three representations of the Ising model

Statistical models that analyse (pairwise) relations between variables encompass assumptions about the underlying mechanism that generated the associations in the observed data. In the present paper we demonstrate that three Ising model representations exist that, although each proposes a distinct theoretical explanation for the observed associations, are mathematically equivalent. This equivalence allows the researcher to interpret the results of one model in three different ways. We illustrate the ramifications of this by discussing concepts that are conceived as problematic in their traditional explanation, yet when interpreted in the context of another explanation make immediate sense.

[1]  H. M. Blalock,et al.  Causal Models Involving Unmeasured Variables in Stimulus - Response Situations * , 2017 .

[2]  Claudia Baier Direction Of Time , 2016 .

[3]  D. Borsboom,et al.  Network analysis: an integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. , 2013, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[4]  E. Ising Beitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus , 1925 .

[5]  Gunter Maris,et al.  Bayesian inference for low-rank Ising networks , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[6]  D. Borsboom,et al.  Deconstructing the construct: A network perspective on psychological phenomena , 2013 .

[7]  J. Pearl,et al.  Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. , 1999, Epidemiology.

[8]  P. Costa,et al.  Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO-Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) , 1992 .

[9]  G. Shaw,et al.  Maternal pesticide exposure from multiple sources and selected congenital anomalies. , 1999 .

[10]  Nanny Wermuth,et al.  A note on the quadratic exponential binary distribution , 1994 .

[11]  R. Ellis,et al.  The statistics of Curie-Weiss models , 1978 .

[12]  Peter McCullagh,et al.  Exponential mixtures and quadratic exponential families , 1994 .

[13]  A. Jensen,et al.  The g factor , 1996, Nature.

[14]  P. Costa,et al.  Empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits , 2008 .

[15]  H.L.J. van der Maas,et al.  A dynamical model of general intelligence: the positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. , 2006, Psychological review.

[16]  A. Beck,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation , 1988 .

[17]  S. Greenland Quantifying Biases in Causal Models: Classical Confounding vs Collider-Stratification Bias , 2003, Epidemiology.

[18]  Hsiu-Ting Yu,et al.  Log-Multiplicative Association Models as Item Response Models , 2007 .

[19]  H. Stanley,et al.  Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena , 1972 .

[20]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Universality in network dynamics , 2013, Nature Physics.

[21]  Samuel Juni,et al.  Revised NEO personality inventory , 1995 .

[22]  Gideon J. Mellenbergh,et al.  Item bias and item response theory , 1989 .

[23]  E. Kay,et al.  Graph Theory. An Algorithmic Approach , 1975 .

[24]  W. Meredith Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance , 1993 .

[25]  A. Barabasi,et al.  The network takeover , 2011, Nature Physics.

[26]  R. Hauser Disaggregating a social-psychological model of educational attainment , 1972 .

[27]  H. Costner Theory, Deduction, and Rules of Correspondence , 1969, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  J. Besag Statistical Analysis of Non-Lattice Data , 1975 .

[29]  E. Jaynes Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics , 1957 .

[30]  Denny Borsboom,et al.  Psychometric perspectives on diagnostic systems. , 2008, Journal of clinical psychology.

[31]  M. Reckase Multidimensional Item Response Theory , 2009 .

[32]  Georg Rasch,et al.  Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests , 1981, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[33]  J. Robins,et al.  A Structural Approach to Selection Bias , 2004, Epidemiology.

[34]  A. Bandura Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[35]  M. Kendall,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery. , 1959 .

[36]  Michael I. Jordan Graphical Models , 2003 .

[37]  Judea Pearl COMMENTS ON NEUBERG'S REVIEW OF CAUSALITY , 2003, Econometric Theory.

[38]  E. Gross,et al.  Statistical physics, phase transitions and superfluidity : Brandeis University Summer Institute in Theoretical Physics, 1966 , 1968 .

[39]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[40]  J. Pearl Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[41]  T. D. Lee,et al.  Statistical Theory of Equations of State and Phase Transitions. II. Lattice Gas and Ising Model , 1952 .

[42]  Claudia D. van Borkulo,et al.  A new method for constructing networks from binary data , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[43]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. , 2000, Psychological methods.

[44]  A. Beck,et al.  An inventory for measuring depression. , 1961, Archives of general psychiatry.

[45]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory , 1982 .

[46]  R. Lennox,et al.  Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. , 1991 .

[47]  R. Krueger,et al.  Toward scientifically useful quantitative models of psychopathology: The importance of a comparative approach , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[48]  Gérard G. Emch,et al.  Pure Thermodynamical Phases as Extremal KMS States , 1970 .

[49]  D. Borsboom,et al.  The concept of validity. , 2004, Psychological review.

[50]  Wm. R. Wright General Intelligence, Objectively Determined and Measured. , 1905 .

[51]  J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[52]  Gary James Jason,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .

[53]  Keith A. Markus,et al.  Reflective measurement models, behavior domains, and common causes , 2013 .

[54]  Ingram Olkin,et al.  Multivariate Correlation Models with Mixed Discrete and Continuous Variables , 1961 .

[55]  J. Besag Spatial Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of Lattice Systems , 1974 .

[56]  A. Tellegen,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES An Alternative "Description of Personality": The Big-Five Factor Structure , 2022 .

[57]  Christopher Winship,et al.  Endogenous Selection Bias: The Problem of Conditioning on a Collider Variable. , 2014, Annual review of sociology.