Chance-Constrained Goal-Programming based day ahead scheduling in wind power integrated system

To mitigate the impact of wind forecasting error uncertainty, a Chance-Constrained Goal Programming (CCGP) based day-ahead scheduling model is proposed in this paper. Compared with the traditional Chance Constrained Programming (CCP) method, the CCGP based model is more flexible, which allows higher violation probability than the predefined probability in necessary situations. In this way, the day-ahead scheduling and the uncertain range covered by reserves can be both optimized. Therefore, the reliability and economy of the system with wind power uncertainty can be considered in details with more flexibilities. In addition, because slack variables in CCGP model have corresponding physical meanings, they can provide more information to system operators. Furthermore, numerical tests are performed with the IEEE 118 bus system with wind power input. Results indicate that the proposed method achieves a good balance of cost and risk. And the total operation cost, especially the unit commitment cost, is reduced by the proposed method. Comparative evaluations of the proposed CCGP method and CCP method are presented in the paper.

[1]  B. Norman,et al.  A solution to the stochastic unit commitment problem using chance constrained programming , 2004 .

[2]  J. Dupacová,et al.  Scenario reduction in stochastic programming: An approach using probability metrics , 2000 .

[3]  J. M. Arroyo,et al.  Contingency-Constrained Unit Commitment With $n - K$ Security Criterion: A Robust Optimization Approach , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Qianfan Wang,et al.  A chance-constrained two-stage stochastic program for unit commitment with uncertain wind power output , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[5]  Daniel S. Kirschen,et al.  Estimating the Spinning Reserve Requirements in Systems With Significant Wind Power Generation Penetration , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Javier Contreras,et al.  Stochastic Unit Commitment in Isolated Systems With Renewable Penetration Under CVaR Assessment , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[7]  Ruiwei Jiang,et al.  Robust Unit Commitment With Wind Power and Pumped Storage Hydro , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  Jitka Dupacová,et al.  Scenario reduction in stochastic programming , 2003, Math. Program..

[9]  Wei Tian,et al.  Chance-Constrained Day-Ahead Scheduling in Stochastic Power System Operation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  Javier Contreras,et al.  Risk-Constrained Optimal Bidding Strategy for Pairing of Wind and Demand Response Resources , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[11]  Bruno Contini,et al.  A Stochastic Approach to Goal Programming , 1968, Oper. Res..

[12]  J. Watson,et al.  Multi-Stage Robust Unit Commitment Considering Wind and Demand Response Uncertainties , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  N. Menemenlis,et al.  Methodologies to Determine Operating Reserves Due to Increased Wind Power , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[14]  Zuyi Li,et al.  Comparison of Scenario-Based and Interval Optimization Approaches to Stochastic SCUC , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  Javier Contreras,et al.  A Chance-Constrained Unit Commitment With an $n-K$ Security Criterion and Significant Wind Generation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  Sergey Sarykalin,et al.  Value-at-Risk vs. Conditional Value-at-Risk in Risk Management and Optimization , 2008 .

[17]  A. Charnes,et al.  Chance-Constrained Programming , 1959 .

[18]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Stochastic Security-Constrained Unit Commitment , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[19]  Yang Wang,et al.  Unit Commitment With Volatile Node Injections by Using Interval Optimization , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[20]  Xu Andy Sun,et al.  Adaptive Robust Optimization for the Security Constrained Unit Commitment Problem , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.