Maximal Independent Set, Weakly-Connected Dominating Set, and Induced Spanners in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks

A maximal independent set (MIS) S for a graph G is an independent set and no proper superset of S is also independent. A set S is dominating if each node in the graph is either in S or adjacent to one of the nodes in S. The subgraph weakly induced by S is the graph G′ such that each edge in G′ has at least one end point in S. A set S is a weakly-connected dominating set (WCDS) of G if S is dominating and G′ is connected. G′ is a sparse spanner if it has linear edges. The nodes of WCDS have been proposed in the literature as clusterheads for clustered wireless ad hoc networks. In this paper, we present two distributed algorithms for constructing a WCDS for wireless ad hoc networks in linear time. The first algorithm has an approximation ratio of 5, and requires O(n log n) messages, while the second algorithm has a larger approximation ratio, and requires only O(n) messages. Both of these algorithms are used to obtain sparse spanners. The spanner obtained by the second algorithm has a topological dilation of 3, and a geometric dilation of 6. Both of these algorithms are based on the construction of a MIS. The first algorithm requires the construction of a spanning tree. The second algorithm is fully localized, and does not depend on the spanning tree, which makes the maintenance of the WCDS simpler, and guarantees the maintenance of the same approximation ratio.

[1]  Peng-Jun Wan,et al.  Distributed Construction of Connected Dominating Set in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[2]  Harry B. Hunt,et al.  Simple heuristics for unit disk graphs , 1995, Networks.

[3]  YannakakisMihalis,et al.  On the hardness of approximating minimization problems , 1994 .

[4]  Brad Karp,et al.  GPSR: greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks , 2000, MobiCom '00.

[5]  Carsten Lund,et al.  On the hardness of approximating minimization problems , 1993, STOC.

[6]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Routing with Guaranteed Delivery in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 1999, DIALM '99.

[7]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Routing with Guaranteed Delivery in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 2001, Wirel. Networks.

[8]  Israel Cidon,et al.  Propagation and Leader Election in a Multihop Broadcast Environment , 1998, DISC.

[9]  Peng-Jun Wan,et al.  Virtual backbones in wireless ad hoc networks , 2002 .

[10]  Arthur L. Liestman,et al.  Approximating minimum size weakly-connected dominating sets for clustering mobile ad hoc networks , 2002, MobiHoc '02.

[11]  Peng-Jun Wan,et al.  New distributed algorithm for connected dominating set in wireless ad hoc networks , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[12]  Vaduvur Bharghavan,et al.  Routing in ad hoc networks using a spine , 1997, Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks.

[13]  Johannes H. Hattingh,et al.  On weakly connected domination in graphs , 1997, Discret. Math..

[14]  Vaduvur Bharghavan,et al.  Routing in ad-hoc networks using minimum connected dominating sets , 1997, Proceedings of ICC'97 - International Conference on Communications.

[15]  Charles J. Colbourn,et al.  Unit disk graphs , 1991, Discret. Math..

[16]  Peng-Jun Wan,et al.  Distributed heuristics for connected dominating sets in wireless ad hoc networks , 2002, Journal of Communications and Networks.

[17]  RNG and internal node based broadcasting algorithms for wireless one-to-one networks , 2001, MOCO.