Pulmonary nodules: volume repeatability at multidetector CT lung cancer screening.

PURPOSE To assess in vivo volumetric repeatability of an automated software algorithm in pulmonary nodules detected during a lung cancer screening trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was approved by an institutional review board. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Data were collected from the Multicentric Italian Lung Detection project, a randomized controlled lung cancer screening trial. The first 1236 consecutive baseline computed tomographic (CT) studies performed at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan were evaluated. Among the enrolled participants, those who underwent repeat low-dose CT after 3 months and had at least one indeterminate nodule with a volume of more than 60 mm(3) (diameter of 4.8 mm or greater) were considered. Nonsolid, part-solid, and pleural-based nodules were excluded from this study. A descriptive analysis was performed by calculating means and standard deviations of nodule volumes at three assessment times (at baseline and 3 and 12 months later). The volume measurement repeatability was determined by using the approach described by Bland and Altman. RESULTS One hundred one subjects (70 men, 31 women; mean age, 58 years) with 233 eligible nodules (mean volume, 98.3 mm(3); range, 5-869 mm(3)) were identified. The 95% confidence interval for difference in measured volumes was in the range of +/-27%. About 70% of measurements had a relative difference in nodule volume of less than 10%. No malignant lesions were registered during the follow-up of these subjects. CONCLUSION Semiautomatic volumetry is sufficiently accurate and repeatable and may be useful in assisting with lung nodule management in a lung cancer screening program.

[1]  D K Owens,et al.  Accuracy of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and mass lesions: a meta-analysis. , 2001, JAMA.

[2]  F. Fischbach,et al.  Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thickness , 2003, European Radiology.

[3]  Simina C. Fluture,et al.  Small pulmonary nodules: reproducibility of three-dimensional volumetric measurement and estimation of time to follow-up CT. , 2004, Radiology.

[4]  C I Henschke,et al.  Does 2-year stability imply that pulmonary nodules are benign? , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  M. L. R. D. Christenson,et al.  Pulmonary Nodules Detected at Lung Cancer Screening: Interobserver Variability of Semiautomated Volume Measurements , 2007 .

[6]  Harry J de Koning,et al.  Effect of nodule characteristics on variability of semiautomated volume measurements in pulmonary nodules detected in a lung cancer screening program. , 2008, Radiology.

[7]  R. Truyen,et al.  Aspects of computer-aided detection (CAD) and volumetry of pulmonary nodules using multislice CT. , 2005, The British journal of radiology.

[8]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  Pulmonary nodules: Interscan variability of semiautomated volume measurements with multisection CT-- influence of inspiration level, nodule size, and segmentation performance. , 2007, Radiology.

[9]  F. Fazio,et al.  Early lung-cancer detection with spiral CT and positron emission tomography in heavy smokers: 2-year results , 2003, The Lancet.

[10]  James G. Ravenel,et al.  Pulmonary nodule volume: effects of reconstruction parameters on automated measurements--a phantom study. , 2008, Radiology.

[11]  Masumi Kadoya,et al.  Indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodules revealed at population-based CT screening of the lung: using first follow-up diagnostic CT to differentiate benign and malignant lesions. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  Mark Tann,et al.  Volumetric growth rate of stage I lung cancer prior to treatment: serial CT scanning. , 2002, Radiology.

[13]  D. Ost,et al.  Solitary Pulmonary Nodule , 2005 .

[14]  M. L. R. D. Christenson,et al.  Guidelines for Management of Small Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Scans: A Statement From the Fleischner Society , 2006 .

[15]  C. Begg,et al.  Computed Tomography Screening and Lung Cancer Outcomes , 2008 .

[16]  T. Franquet,et al.  Unusual primary lung tumors: a radiologic-pathologic overview. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[17]  G. Chatellier,et al.  Pulmonary nodules: preliminary experience with three-dimensional evaluation. , 2004, Radiology.

[18]  U. Pastorino.  Early Detection of Lung Cancer , 2006, Respiration.

[19]  Binsheng Zhao,et al.  Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. , 2000, Radiology.

[20]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[21]  M. Revel,et al.  Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable? , 2004, Radiology.

[22]  Margrit Betke,et al.  Small pulmonary nodules: volume measurement at chest CT--phantom study. , 2003, Radiology.

[23]  W. Heindel,et al.  Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility , 2003, European Radiology.

[24]  Ali O. Farooqi,et al.  CT screening for lung cancer Assessing a regimen's diagnostic performance. , 2004, Clinical imaging.

[25]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  Pulmonary nodules detected at lung cancer screening: interobserver variability of semiautomated volume measurements. , 2006, Radiology.

[26]  T. McLoud,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy and safety of CT-guided percutaneous needle aspiration biopsy of the lung: comparison of small and large pulmonary nodules. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  C. Henschke.  Early lung cancer action project , 2000, Cancer.