Adaptive Thresholding for Improving Sensitivity in Single-Trial Simultaneous EEG/fMRI

A common approach used to fuse simultaneously recorded EEG and fMRI is to correlate trial-by-trial variability in the EEG, or variability of components derived therefrom, with the blood oxygenation level dependent response. When this correlation is done using the conventional univariate approach, for example with the general linear model, there is the usual problem of correcting the statistics for multiple comparisons. Cluster thresholding is often used as the correction of choice, though in many cases it is utilized in an ad hoc way, for example by employing the same cluster thresholds for both traditional regressors (stimulus or behaviorally derived) and EEG-derived regressors. In this paper we describe a resampling procedure that takes into account the a priori statistics of the trial-to-trial variability of the EEG-derived regressors in a way that trades off cluster size and maximum voxel Z-score to properly correct for multiple comparisons. We show that this data adaptive procedure improves sensitivity for smaller clusters of activation, without sacrificing the specificity of the results. Our results suggest that extra care is needed in correcting statistics when the regressor model is derived from noisy and/or uncertain measurements, as is the case for regressors constructed from single-trial variations in the EEG.

[1]  W. Sommer,et al.  Effects of Parametrical and Trial-to-Trial Variation in Prior Probability Processing Revealed by Simultaneous Electroencephalogram/Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Combining Spatial Extent and Peak Intensity to Test for Activations in Functional Imaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[3]  Abdelhak M. Zoubir,et al.  Bootstrap Methods in Signal Processing , 2007 .

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[5]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  The BOLD correlates of the visual P1 and N1 in single-trial analysis of simultaneous EEG-fMRI recordings during a spatial detection task , 2011, NeuroImage.

[6]  EEG signatures of auditory activity correlate with simultaneously recorded fMRI responses in humans , 2010, NeuroImage.

[7]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Combined distributed source and single-trial EEG–fMRI modeling: Application to effortful decision making processes , 2009, NeuroImage.

[8]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review , 2003, Statistical methods in medical research.

[9]  Maximilian Reiser,et al.  Single-trial coupling of the gamma-band response and the corresponding BOLD signal , 2010, NeuroImage.

[10]  A. Engel,et al.  Trial-by-Trial Coupling of Concurrent Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Identifies the Dynamics of Performance Monitoring , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[12]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Recipes for the linear analysis of EEG , 2005, NeuroImage.

[13]  P. Sajda,et al.  Spatiotemporal Linear Decoding of Brain State , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[14]  Abdelhak M. Zoubir,et al.  Bootstrap Methods in Signal Processing [From the Guest Editors] , 2007 .

[15]  P. Sajda,et al.  A System for Single-trial Analysis of Simultaneously Acquired EEG and fMRI , 2007, 2007 3rd International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.

[16]  David Friedman,et al.  Single-trial discrimination for integrating simultaneous EEG and fMRI: Identifying cortical areas contributing to trial-to-trial variability in the auditory oddball task , 2009, NeuroImage.

[17]  J. Rohrbaugh,et al.  Endogenous potentials generated in the human hippocampal formation and amygdala by infrequent events. , 1980, Science.