Using Corporate Universities to Failitate Knowledge Transfer and Achieve Competitive Advantage: An Exploratory Model Based on Media Richness and Type of Knowledge to be Transferred

The knowledge literature suggests that transferring knowledge leads to synergistic cost advantages, better implementation of organizational strategies, and competitive advantage. Organizations are implementing corporate universities to aid in knowledge transfer. There is no standardized definition for corporate universities, but rather models that allow organizations to customize them to meet their training needs. Building on recent work of managing the knowledge transfer process (Murray & Peyrefitte, 2007) and on seminal work on media richness theory (Daft & Lengel, 1986), the authors propose that the type of knowledge to be transferred, and the appropriate media to transfer that knowledge, determine the most beneficial generation of corporate university to achieve competitive advantage. The article presents a model and propositions concerning relationships between the type of knowledge to be transferred, appropriate media selection, and generation of corporate university to implement.

[1]  Stuart G. Walesh,et al.  CORPORATE UNIVERSITY: CONSULTING FIRM CASE STUDY , 1998 .

[2]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizational Colleagues, Media Richness, and Electronic Mail , 1991 .

[3]  Thomas H. Brush.  PREDICTED CHANGE IN OPERATIONAL SYNERGY AND POST‐ACQUISITION PERFORMANCE OF ACQUIRED BUSINESSES , 1996 .

[4]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[5]  Yu Zhou,et al.  MNE Knowledge Management Across Borders and ICT , 2011, Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management.

[6]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[7]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions , 1999 .

[8]  Philip Calvert,et al.  Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management , 2008 .

[9]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[10]  V. Govindarajan,et al.  Strategy, Control Systems, and Resource Sharing: Effects on Business-Unit Performance , 1990 .

[11]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[12]  Patricia Paderewski,et al.  A Service Oriented Architecture for Coordination in Collaborative Environments , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Syst. Approach.

[13]  Mirghani Mohamed,et al.  The Key Requirements for Deploying Knowledge Management Services in a Semantic Grid Environment , 2007, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[14]  Jeanne C. Meister.  THE QUEST FOR LIFETIME EMPLOYABILITY , 1998 .

[15]  N.A.D. Connell,et al.  Knowledge characteristics of communities of practice , 2005 .

[16]  Ben Tran.  Knowledge Management: The Construction of Knowledge in Organizations , 2009 .

[17]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Resource Sharing Among Sbus: Strategic Antecedents and Administrative Implications , 1986 .

[18]  Salah Hamza,et al.  Capturing Tacit Knowledge from Transient Workers: Improving the Organizational Competitiveness , 2009, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[19]  Murray E. Jennex,et al.  A meta-analysis of methodologies for research in knowledge management, organizational learning and organizational memory: five years at HICSS , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[20]  David Snowden,et al.  The First Age: Information for Decision Support 1995: the Transition to the Second Age Complex Acts of Knowing: Paradox and Descriptive Self-awareness , 2022 .

[21]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[22]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  The need for an organizational knowledge management , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[23]  Jeanne C. Meister,et al.  Ten Steps to Creating a Corporate University. , 1998 .

[24]  Venkataraman Ramesh,et al.  Enhancing Performance Through Knowledge Management: A Holistic Framework , 2005, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[25]  M. Bazerman,et al.  BLIND SPOTS IN INDUSTRY AND COMPETITOR ANALYSIS: IMPLICATIONS OF INTERFIRM (MIS)PERCEPTIONS FOR STRATEGIC DECISIONS , 1991 .

[26]  J. Meister,et al.  Corporate universities : lessons in building a world-class work force , 1998 .

[27]  M. Porter.  From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy , 1989 .

[28]  S. Hochstein,et al.  View from the Top Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System , 2002, Neuron.

[29]  Richard Greenberg,et al.  Corporate U. Takes the Job Training Field. , 1998 .

[30]  Amir Khanlari,et al.  Organizational Readiness Assessment for Knowledge Management , 2009, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[31]  Cynthia Jimes,et al.  Reconsidering the tacit-explicit distinction - A move toward functional (tacit) knowledge management , 2003 .

[32]  Steve Cocheo.  If You Build It, They Will Learn: Constructed from Scratch, First National Bank of Colorado's Corporate University Produces Results Far beyond Expectations , 2004 .

[33]  Michael A. Chilton,et al.  The Dimensions of Tacit & Explicit Knowledge: A Description and Measure , 2008, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[34]  N. K. Muir,et al.  The Richness Imperative and Cognitive Style , 1990 .

[35]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[36]  Anssi Smedlund,et al.  Social Network Structures for Explicit, Tacit and Potential Knowledge , 2009, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[37]  Alice C. Stewart,et al.  CREATION AND UTILIZATION OF ORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF THE ROLES OF ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING ON STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING. , 1997 .

[38]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[39]  L. Pereira,et al.  International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations , 2011 .

[40]  Eddie Blass,et al.  What's in a name? A comparative study of the traditional public university and the corporate university , 2001 .

[41]  M. Dodgson.  Organizational Learning: A Review of Some Literatures , 1993 .

[42]  Keith C. C. Chan,et al.  Inexperienced Software Team and Global Software Team , 2003 .

[43]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Knowledge, Strategy, and the Theory of the Firm , 1996 .

[44]  Jon Desenberg.  Moving Past the Information Age: Getting Started with Knowledge Management , 2000 .

[45]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  DIFFERENT KNOWLEDGE, DIFFERENT BENEFITS: TOWARD APRODUCTIVITY PERSPECTIVE ON KNOWLEDGE SHARING INORGANIZATIONS. , 2001 .

[46]  William J. Doll,et al.  A Model of Interrelationships Among Individual Level Knowledge Management Success Measures , 2009, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[47]  S. Murray,et al.  Knowledge Type and Communication Media Choice in the Knowledge Transfer Process , 2007 .

[48]  Hazel Taylor.  Tacit Knowledge: Conceptualizations and Operationalizations , 2007, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[49]  Jane S. Webster,et al.  Rational and social theories as complementary explanations of communication media choices: two polic , 1995 .

[50]  Subba Narasimha,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE, HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: TOWARD A FRAMEWORK , 2000 .

[51]  St. Amant,et al.  Knowledge and Information Technology Management: Human and Social Perspectives , 2004 .

[52]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Knowledge management, organizational memory and organizational learning , 2000, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[53]  R. Daft,et al.  The Selection of Communication Media as an Executive Skill , 1988 .

[54]  JoAnn Greco.  CORPORATE HOME SCHOOLING , 1997 .

[55]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[56]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  An Investigation of Media Selection Among Directors and Managers: From "Self" to "Other" Orientation , 1998, MIS Q..