Introduction: Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) is currently considered the procedure of choice for the treatment of endothelial dysfunctions. Despite DSAEK being a promising procedure to improve visual acuity (VA), the ideal graft thickness donor still remains under discussion. Purpose: To analyze the influence of graft thickness on postoperative VA and complications in DSAEK surgery. Methods: Retrospective study of 112 eyes that underwent DSAEK surgery. Donor grafts were obtained by dissection with automatic microkeratome, using different head sizes. Central corneal thickness (CCT) of donor corneas before dissection was measured by ultrasound pachymetry. The choice of the cutting depth was based on CCT measurements and the final desired residual corneal thickness, corresponding to the estimated donor graft thickness (EDGT). The eyes were divided into 3 groups, depending on the EDGT: 200 μm (Group 3). Intraoperative, postoperative complications and the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6 months postoperatively were evaluated, comparing these 3 groups. Results: The average EDGT was 164 ± 10 μm in Group 1188 ± 7 μm in Group 2 and 234 ± 30 μm in Group 3. At 6 months postoperative the average BCVA was significantly better in Group 1 (BCVA: 0.74 ± 0.20), compared to Group 2 (BCVA: 0.54 ± 0.20) and Group 3 (BCVA: 0.39 ± 0.18). Intraoperative and postoperative complications included: graft perforation during cutting (0.9% of cases), graft rejection (3.6%), primary graft failure (4.5%), and graft detachment (3.6%). Its distribution was uniform between the 3 groups. Conclusion: The study proves that DSAEK is an effective surgical technique for the treatment of endothelial dysfunction, demonstrating that the use of thinner grafts (EDGT < 180 μm) can improve the final visual outcome, with a significant improvement on BCVA, without increasing the risk of complications.
[1]
N. Sharma,et al.
Comparative Evaluation of Use of 400-&mgr;m and 350-&mgr;m Microkeratome Head to Prepare Donor Tissue in Cases of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty
,
2017,
Eye & contact lens.
[2]
M. Rajan,et al.
Visual Outcomes and Graft Thickness in Microthin DSAEK—One-Year Results
,
2015,
Cornea.
[3]
B. Acar,et al.
Visual acuity and endothelial cell density with respect to the graft thickness in Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: one year results.
,
2014,
International journal of ophthalmology.
[4]
A. van der Lelij,et al.
DSAEK: Practical Approach to Choose the Microkeratome Head on the Basis of Donor Cornea Pachymetry
,
2014,
Cornea.
[5]
Terry Kim,et al.
Effect of cornea donor graft thickness on the outcome of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty surgery.
,
2013,
American journal of ophthalmology.
[6]
P. Phillips,et al.
Preoperative Graft Thickness Measurements Do Not Influence Final BSCVA or Speed of Vision Recovery After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty
,
2013,
Cornea.
[7]
P. Hossain,et al.
Impact of graft thickness on visual acuity after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty
,
2011,
British Journal of Ophthalmology.
[8]
E. Holland,et al.
Comparison of Central Corneal Graft Thickness to Visual Acuity Outcomes in Endothelial Keratoplasty
,
2011,
Cornea.
[9]
F. Kruse,et al.
Changes in donor corneal lenticule thickness after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) with organ-cultured corneas
,
2009,
British Journal of Ophthalmology.