Reflections on Design-Based Research: - In Online Educational and Competence Development Projects -

Design-Based Research (DBR) is a relatively new intervention method investigating educational designs applied to real-life settings, and with a dual purpose to develop domain theories and to develop the design, iteratively. This paper is an integrative review, which draws on literature and empirical projects to identify and discuss critical elements in DBR, in particular when doing research in online educational projects, where the learning process expands from a traditional classroom to everyday work and life practices, as in competence development projects. Elements from two older, more mature, intervention approaches Interaction Design and Action Research, is included into the DBR discussion, and possible ways to work with the critical incidents are suggested. The paper argues that there is a risk of avoiding real-life factors by isolating the real-life intervention to the actors and actions in the classroom and thus mirroring some of the draw-backs in laboratory experimental research that DBR wanted to distance itself from. The discussion raises issues as users’ needs, resistance, organizational relations, and alternative design solutions. Also, this type of online and competence development processes needs new empirical methods, and an argument for rigour in the DBR analysis and theory generation phases is presented.

[1]  D. Greenwood,et al.  Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change , 1998 .

[2]  Daniel C. Edelson Design Research: What We Learn When We Engage in Design , 2002 .

[3]  Feng Wang,et al.  Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments , 2005 .

[4]  Jacob Nielsen,et al.  How Design-based Research, Action Research and Interaction Design Contributes to the Development of Designs for Learning , 2011 .

[5]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  From design experiments to formative interventions , 2008, ICLS.

[6]  R. K. Gejji Production technology today , 1973 .

[7]  T. Reeves,et al.  Systematic Review of Design-Based Research Progress , 2013 .

[8]  T. Anderson,et al.  Design-Based Research , 2012 .

[9]  Charlotte Lærke Weitze,et al.  The Global Classroom Model Simultaneous Campus-and Home-Based Education Using Videoconferencing. , 2014 .

[10]  Jari Lavonen,et al.  Design-Based Research in Science Education: One Step Towards Methodology , 2012 .

[11]  J. V. Maanen,et al.  Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography , 1989 .

[12]  Brian C. Nelson,et al.  Design-based Research Strategies for Developing a Scientific Inquiry Curriculum in a Multi-User Virtual Environment , 2005 .

[13]  Rikke Omgreen The Design Sketching Process , 2006, HWID.

[14]  Chris Dede,et al.  Why Design-Based Research is Both Important and Difficult , 2005 .

[15]  Robert Thornberg Informed Grounded Theory , 2012 .

[16]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Design-Based Research and Educational Technology: Rethinking Technology and the Research Agenda , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[17]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  Design-Based Research: A Methodological Toolkit for the Learning Scientist. , 2006 .

[18]  R. Whittemore,et al.  The integrative review: updated methodology. , 2005, Journal of advanced nursing.

[19]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Grounded action research: a method for understanding IT in practice , 1999 .

[20]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .

[21]  Morten Hertzum,et al.  What you get is what you see: revisiting the evaluator effect in usability tests , 2014, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[22]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  A Scandinavian challenge, a US response: methodological assumptions in Scandinavian and US prototyping approaches , 2002, SIGDOC '02.

[23]  K. Squire,et al.  Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground , 2004 .

[24]  Rikke Orngreen,et al.  Mobile Probing and Probes , 2013, HWID.

[25]  Allan Collins,et al.  Toward a Design Science of Education , 1992 .

[26]  Rikke Ørngreen Multimedia teaching cases , 2002 .

[27]  N. Cross Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline Versus Design Science , 2001, Design Issues.

[28]  Chris Dede,et al.  If Design-Based Research is the Answer, What is the Question? A Commentary on Collins, Joseph, and Bielaczyc; diSessa and Cobb; and Fishman, Marx, Blumenthal, Krajcik, and Soloway in the JLS Special Issue on Design-Based Research , 2004 .

[29]  G. Lyon,et al.  Critical Conceptual and Methodological Considerations in Reading Intervention Research , 1997, Journal of learning disabilities.

[30]  D. Greenwood,et al.  Introduction to Action Research , 2007 .