Growth mixture modeling with non‐normal distributions

A limiting feature of previous work on growth mixture modeling is the assumption of normally distributed variables within each latent class. With strongly non‐normal outcomes, this means that several latent classes are required to capture the observed variable distributions. Being able to relax the assumption of within‐class normality has the advantage that a non‐normal observed distribution does not necessitate using more than one class to fit the distribution. It is valuable to add parameters representing the skewness and the thickness of the tails. A new growth mixture model of this kind is proposed drawing on recent work in a series of papers using the skew‐t distribution. The new method is illustrated using the longitudinal development of body mass index in two data sets. The first data set is from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth covering ages 12–23 years. Here, the development is related to an antecedent measuring socioeconomic background. The second data set is from the Framingham Heart Study covering ages 25–65 years. Here, the development is related to the concurrent event of treatment for hypertension using a joint growth mixture‐survival model. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Muthén Bengt,et al.  Growth Mixture Modeling , 2008, Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders.

[2]  Yangxin Huang,et al.  Bayesian analysis of nonlinear mixed-effects mixture models for longitudinal data with heterogeneity and skewness. , 2014, Statistics in medicine.

[3]  N. Dendukuri,et al.  Statistics for quantifying heterogeneity in univariate and bivariate meta‐analyses of binary data: The case of meta‐analyses of diagnostic accuracy , 2014, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Finite mixtures of multivariate skew t-distributions: some recent and new results , 2014, Stat. Comput..

[5]  E. Erosheva,et al.  Breaking Bad: Two Decades of Life-Course Data Analysis in Criminology, Developmental Psychology, and Beyond , 2014 .

[6]  Sharon X. Lee,et al.  The skew-t factor analysis model , 2013, 1310.5336.

[7]  B. Muthén,et al.  Growth modeling with nonignorable dropout: alternative analyses of the STAR*D antidepressant trial. , 2011, Psychological methods.

[8]  B. Muthén,et al.  Estimating drug effects in the presence of placebo response: Causal inference using growth mixture modeling , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  E. Finkelstein,et al.  Youth BMI Trajectories: Evidence From the NLSY97 , 2009, Obesity.

[10]  B. Muthén,et al.  Applications Of Continuous-Time Survival In Latent Variable Models For The Analysis Of Oncology Randomized Clinical Trial Data Using Mplus , 2009 .

[11]  B. Muthén,et al.  Growth mixture modeling , 2008 .

[12]  Tihomir Asparouhov,et al.  Continuous Time Survival in Latent Variable Models , 2006 .

[13]  K. Larsen,et al.  Joint Analysis of Time‐to‐Event and Multiple Binary Indicators of Latent Classes , 2004, Biometrics.

[14]  Daniel J Bauer,et al.  Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. , 2003, Psychological methods.

[15]  C. McCulloch,et al.  Latent Class Models for Joint Analysis of Longitudinal Biomarker and Event Process Data , 2002 .

[16]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Finite Mixture Models , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[17]  Bruce W. Turnbull,et al.  A latent class mixed model for analysing biomarker trajectories with irregularly scheduled observations. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  Kathryn Roeder,et al.  Modeling Uncertainty in Latent Class Membership: A Case Study in Criminology , 1999 .

[19]  B. Muthén,et al.  Finite Mixture Modeling with Mixture Outcomes Using the EM Algorithm , 1999, Biometrics.

[20]  George Marsaglia,et al.  The Monty Python Method for Generating Gamma Variables , 1999 .

[21]  Robert J. Boik,et al.  Derivatives of the Incomplete Beta Function , 1998 .

[22]  .. W. V. Der,et al.  On Profile Likelihood , 2000 .

[23]  G. Verbeke,et al.  A Linear Mixed-Effects Model with Heterogeneity in the Random-Effects Population , 1996 .

[24]  K. Land,et al.  AGE, CRIMINAL CAREERS, AND POPULATION HETEROGENEITY: SPECIFICATION AND ESTIMATION OF A NONPARAMETRIC, MIXED POISSON MODEL* , 1993 .

[25]  Nicholas J. Schork,et al.  Skewness and mixtures of normal distributions , 1988 .

[26]  J. Ware,et al.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data. , 1982, Biometrics.

[27]  W. Kannel,et al.  AN APPROACH TO LONGITUDINAL STUDIES IN A COMMUNITY: THE FRAMINGHAM STUDY , 1963, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[28]  K. Pearson.  Contributions to the Mathematical Theory of Evolution. II. Skew Variation in Homogeneous Material , 1895 .