What's New about the New Public Management? Administrative Change in the Human Services

Interpretations of the emergence of the New Public Management are split. The champions of the movement present it as a new administrative paradigm that departs sharply from past thinking and practice, whereas skeptics argue it has evolved incrementally from past administrative traditions. To assess these views, this article examines recent administrative innovations in the human services that broadly reflect the New Public Management. The findings suggest that these innovations have built incrementally on past reforms in the human services field, supporting the skeptics' claim that the New Public Management represents an evolution and renewal of historical trends in public administration.

[1]  Robert D. Behn,et al.  Rethinking Democratic Accountability , 2001 .

[2]  K. Popper Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Normal Science and its Dangers , 1970 .

[3]  W. Bion,et al.  Learning from experience , 2007 .

[4]  P. White The Eye of the Storm , 1973 .

[5]  L. Lynn The Myth of the Bureaucratic Paradigm: What Traditional Public Administration Really Stood For , 2001 .

[6]  J. Knitzer,et al.  Map and Track: State Initiatives for Young Children and Families , 1996 .

[7]  Jane Waldfogel,et al.  The New Wave of Service Integration , 1997, Social Service Review.

[8]  Patrick J. Wolf A Case Survey of Bureaucratic Effectiveness in U.S. Cabinet Agencies: Preliminary Results , 1993 .

[9]  Michael Barzelay,et al.  Breaking Through Bureaucracy , 1992 .

[10]  Patrick J. Wolf Why Must We Reinvent the Federal Government? Putting Historical Developmental Claims to the Test , 1997 .

[11]  Robert Agranoff,et al.  Human Services Integration: Past and Present Challenges in Public Administration , 1991 .

[12]  Laurence E. Lynn,et al.  A critical analysis of the new public management , 1998 .

[13]  C. Lindblom THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGH , 1959 .

[14]  E. Brodkin Inside the Welfare Contract: Discretion and Accountability in State Welfare Administration , 1997, Social Service Review.

[15]  J. Dryfoos Full-Service Schools. , 1996 .

[16]  Peter van Ham,et al.  Interview with the Author , 2001 .

[17]  J. Ferris,et al.  A contractual framework for new public management theory , 1998 .

[18]  H. Rainey,et al.  Galloping Elephants: Developing Elements of a Theory of Effective Government Organizations , 1999 .

[19]  J. Patrick Dobel,et al.  Paradigms, Traditions, and Keeping the Faith , 2001 .

[20]  C. Gersick REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE THEORIES: A MULTILEVEL EXPLORATION OF THE PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM PARADIGM , 1991 .

[21]  B. Guy Peters,et al.  The future of governing , 1996 .

[22]  S. Timimi Children's mental health , 2006 .

[23]  William Julius Wilson,et al.  When Work Disappears: New Implications for Race and Urban Poverty in the Global Economy , 1998, Celebrating 40 Years of Ethnic and Racial Studies.

[24]  Charles F. Sabel,et al.  A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism , 1998 .

[25]  Martha Derthick Uncontrollable spending for social services grants , 1975 .

[26]  H. B. Milword Integrating Services for Children and Families: Understanding the Past to Shape the Future , 1993 .

[27]  Stephen Page,et al.  Entrepreneurial Strategies for Managing Interagency Collaboration , 2003 .

[28]  Danny Miller,et al.  Momentum and Revolution in Organizational Adaptation , 1980 .

[29]  J. Knitzer Service integration for children and families: Lessons and questions. , 1997 .

[30]  R. Haveman POLICY ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION RESEARCH AFTER TWENTY YEARS , 1987 .

[31]  Jodi R. Sandfort,et al.  Moving Beyond Discretion and Outcomes: Examining Public Management from the Front Lines of the Welfare System , 2000 .

[32]  Gene A. Brewer,et al.  Why Elephants Gallop: Assessing and Predicting Organizational Performance in Federal Agencies , 2000 .

[33]  Coordinated Service Delivery and Children's Well-Being , 2000 .

[34]  I. Lakatos,et al.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1970 .

[35]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[36]  Robert L. Schalock,et al.  Measuring outcomes and managing for results , 2003 .