Combination of multiple biological quality elements into waterbody assessment of surface waters

The Water Framework Directive (WFD) requires EU Member States to classify the ecological status of surface waters by using multiple biological quality elements (BQEs). According to the WFD Classification Guidance, a ‘one-out-all-out’ (OOAO) rule should be applied when integrating multiple BQEs into an overall biological status of a waterbody, i.e. classification is determined by the lowest status BQE. Using both simulated and monitoring datasets, we analyzed the effects of different combination rules in classification outcome and classification reliability. The OOAO represented the strictest combination rule in terms of increased probabilities of waterbodies being in moderate or worse status in comparison to other rules. The OOAO approach gave acceptable results when different BQEs were complementary, showing the effects of different pressures, and when level of uncertainty in the metrics used in the assessment was not high. Increasing the number of BQEs used in the assessment affected the classification outcome when using the OOAO approach; this was especially problematic if all BQEs address the same pressure. Our study showed that grouping of metrics and metrics uncertainty has a large influence on classification outcomes and that this should be carefully considered to ensure that final classification adequately reflects ecological status.

[1]  Philippe Quevauviller,et al.  The Water Framework Directive , 2008 .

[2]  Angel Borja,et al.  Problems associated with the 'one-out, all-out' principle, when using multiple ecosystem components in assessing the ecological status of marine waters. , 2010, Marine pollution bulletin.

[3]  Marko Järvinen,et al.  Defining the ecological status of small forest lakes using multiple biological quality elements and palaeolimnological analysis. , 2009 .

[4]  B. Moss,et al.  The Water Framework Directive: total environment or political compromise? , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  Mike T. Furse,et al.  Detection of ecological change using multiple organism groups: metrics and uncertainty , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[6]  Juan Bald,et al.  Using multiple ecosystem components, in assessing ecological status in Spanish (Basque Country) Atlantic marine waters. , 2009, Marine pollution bulletin.

[7]  Á. Borja,et al.  The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: a critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[8]  Nathan Pike,et al.  Using false discovery rates for multiple comparisons in ecology and evolution , 2011 .

[9]  Erik Jeppesen,et al.  Water Framework Directive: ecological classification of Danish lakes , 2005 .

[10]  A. Cattaneo,et al.  Periphyton as an early indicator of perturbation in recreational lakes , 2008 .

[11]  Ralph T. Clarke.  Estimating confidence of European WFD ecological status class and WISER Bioassessment Uncertainty Guidance Software (WISERBUGS) , 2012, Hydrobiologia.

[12]  Lauri Arvola,et al.  Ecological classification of large lakes in Finland: comparison of classification approaches using multiple quality elements , 2011, Hydrobiologia.

[13]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  The determination of ecological status in shallow lakes - a tested system (ECOFRAME) for implementation of the European Water Framework Directive , 2003 .

[14]  Noges Peeter,et al.  Indicators and Criteria to Assess Ecological Status of the Large Shallow Temperate Polymictic Lakes Peipsi (Estonia/Russia) and Võrtsjärv (Estonia) , 2006 .

[15]  Michael Warne,et al.  Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality , 2001 .

[16]  Krzysztof Szoszkiewicz,et al.  Assessment of european streams with diatoms, macrophytes, macroinvertebrates and fish : a comparative metric-based analysis of organism response to stress , 2006 .

[17]  Leonard Sandin.  Testing the EC Water Framework Directive “one-out, all-out” rule — simulating different levels of assessment errors along a pollution gradient in Swedish streams , 2005 .