The evolutionary dynamics of China's electric vehicle industry - Taxes vs. subsidies

Abstract The development of the electric vehicle (EV) industry in China has not achieved the desired target even though governments have advanced numerous incentive policies. This paper provides a theoretical explanation for this phenomenon by building an evolutionary game model between auto manufacturers and governments, analyzing the effects of governmental emission taxations and subsidies on the decision making of auto manufacturers and on the dynamic tendency of the EV industry. Considering the governmental politic power both on the consumer demand and on the vehicle supply, this study estimates the influence of government policies on EV industry development under three decision scenarios: the static emission taxations and static subsidies scenario, the dynamic emission taxations and static subsidies scenario and the dynamic subsidies and static emission taxations scenario. The evolutionary stable strategy of the evolutionary game between governments and auto manufacturers is derived. Finally, a case study of China’s EV industry is examined with the simulation. The results show that: Under the static condition, the evolutionary game presents amplitude fluctuation and no stable strategy between game players. When governments implement a dynamic taxation strategy or a dynamic subsidy strategy, the evolutionary game exhibits to be stable. Furthermore, the probability of auto manufacturers to produce EV is positively correlated with the upper bound of emission taxations and negatively correlated with the ceiling of subsidies. The simulation results, in the end, indicate that the efficient politic power on consumer demand accelerates the evolutionary path of the EV industry and a policy of dynamic taxations and static subsidies is more effective on EV industry development than other policies.

[1]  Erwin Schmid,et al.  Analysis of alternative policy instruments to promote electric vehicles in Austria , 2011 .

[2]  S. Rosen,et al.  Monopoly and product quality , 1978 .

[3]  Preyas S. Desai,et al.  Enabling the Willing: Consumer Rebates for Durable Goods , 2006 .

[4]  Gang Yu,et al.  Supply chain disruption management and evolutionarily stable strategies of retailers in the quantity-setting duopoly situation with homogeneous goods , 2006, European Journal of Operational Research.

[5]  D. Navinchandra,et al.  Steps Toward Environmentally Compatible Product and Process Design: A case for Green Engineering , 1990 .

[6]  D. Friedman EVOLUTIONARY GAMES IN ECONOMICS , 1991 .

[7]  Nesim Erkip,et al.  Designing an intervention strategy for public-interest goods: The California electric vehicle market case , 2017 .

[8]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  A decision framework for the analysis of green supply chain contracts: An evolutionary game approach , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  K. Govindan,et al.  A system dynamics model based on evolutionary game theory for green supply chain management diffusion among Chinese manufacturers , 2014 .

[10]  Ned Kock,et al.  An Evolutionary Game Theoretic Perspective on E-Collaboration: The Collaboration Effort and Media Relativeness , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Sarada Prasad Sarmah,et al.  Evolutionary stability of auction and supply chain contracting: An analysis based on disintermediation in the Indian tea supply chains , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Ramteen Sioshansi,et al.  OR Forum - Modeling the Impacts of Electricity Tariffs on Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Charging, Costs, and Emissions , 2012, Oper. Res..

[13]  P. Ji,et al.  Developing green purchasing relationships for the manufacturing industry: An evolutionary game theory perspective , 2015 .

[14]  Morteza Rasti Barzoki,et al.  Sustainable supply chain management with pricing, greening and governmental tariffs determining strategies: A game-theoretic approach , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[15]  Jian Liu,et al.  Promoting electric automobiles: supply chain analysis under a government’s subsidy incentive scheme , 2013 .

[16]  Serguei Netessine,et al.  Electric Vehicles with a Battery Switching Station: Adoption and Environmental Impact , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[17]  Amy J. C. Trappey,et al.  An XML based supply chain integration hub for green product lifecycle management , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[18]  M. Weinstein Lyapunov stability of ground states of nonlinear dispersive evolution equations , 1986 .

[19]  Yu‐Shan Chen,et al.  The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan , 2006 .

[20]  Mark Ferguson,et al.  The Car Sharing Economy: Interaction of Business Model Choice and Product Line Design , 2016 .

[21]  Ashkan Hafezalkotob,et al.  Competition of two green and regular supply chains under environmental protection and revenue seeking policies of government , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[22]  J. Sterman,et al.  Transition challenges for alternative fuel vehicle and transportation systems , 2006 .

[23]  Chialin Chen,et al.  Design for the Environment: A Quality-Based Model for Green Product Development , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[24]  Xiang Zhang,et al.  Incentive Policies from 2006 to 2016 and New Energy Vehicle Adoption in 2010–2020 in China , 2016 .

[25]  Mustafa Kamal,et al.  Waste-to-wealth: green potential from palm biomass in Malaysia , 2012 .

[26]  R. Zhao,et al.  For the sustainable performance of the carbon reduction labeling policies under an evolutionary game simulation , 2016 .

[27]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Application of fuzzy VIKOR for evaluation of green supply chain management practices , 2015 .

[28]  George A. Akerlof The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism , 1970 .

[29]  A. Skonhoft,et al.  The Norwegian support and subsidy policy of electric cars. Should it be adopted by other countries , 2014 .

[30]  J. Xie,et al.  Policy Incentives for the Adoption of Electric Vehicles across Countries , 2014 .

[31]  Jessica Y Guo,et al.  Strategic policies and demonstration program of electric vehicle in China , 2012 .

[32]  Hongyi Li,et al.  Historical evolution and benefit-cost explanation of periodical fluctuation in coal mine safety supervision: An evolutionary game analysis framework , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  J. Xie,et al.  Review of electric vehicle policies in China: Content summary and effect analysis , 2017 .

[34]  Stefan Tscharaktschiew,et al.  The optimal subsidy on electric vehicles in German metropolitan areas: A spatial general equilibrium analysis , 2013 .

[35]  Jian Huang,et al.  Supply chain analysis under a price-discount incentive scheme for electric vehicles , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..