Intention and outcome: key components of causal structure facilitating mapping in children's analogical transfer.

The consequences of two key features of causal structure in source stories, intention and positive outcome, for analogical transfer were examined in kindergarten and second graders. In Experiment 1, children received either structure-complete, structure-incomplete, or irrelevant source stories. Structure-incomplete stories lacked either the intention to solve a problem (a goal-directed component), evidence of a successful consequence (an outcome-related component), or both as part of the solution activity described in source stories. Evidence for transfer was obtained for second graders when a goal-directed component, and to a lesser extent, an outcome-related component were connected to the solution action in source stories. Differences among conditions for kindergartners were less evident, although they revealed a pattern of performance similar to the second graders. A second experiment was conducted to determine whether memory and an orientation to use the source story information might account for these findings. Efforts to ensure memory for and hints to use information in the source stories, however, did not benefit solution transfer when intention and positive outcome were absent. These results suggest that a complete causal structure, including goal and outcome, in source stories augments transfer in young children by promoting mapping of the analogical relationship between source stories and the target problem.

[1]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  The development of strategies for studying texts. , 1978 .

[2]  J. Bransford,et al.  Memory access: The effects of fact-oriented versus problem-oriented acquisition , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[3]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Analogical problem solving , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Katherine Nelson,et al.  Effects of script structure on children's story recall. , 1983 .

[5]  N. S. Johnson,et al.  Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Mary Lamon,et al.  Conceptual transfer insimple insight problems , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[7]  Mary Jo Kane,et al.  Young children's mental models determine analogical transfer across problems with a common goal structure * , 1986 .

[8]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Rating the Importance of Structural Units of Prose Passages: A Problem of Metacognitive Development. , 1977 .

[9]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Causal relatedness and importance of story events , 1985 .

[10]  D. Gentner,et al.  Systematicity and Surface Similarity in the Development of Analogy. Technical Report No. 358. , 1985 .

[11]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Development of analogical problem-solving skill. , 1984, Child development.

[12]  Zhe Chen,et al.  Protagonist, Theme, and Goal Object: Effects of Surface Features on Analogical Transfer. , 1993 .

[13]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Mechanisms of Analogical Learning. , 1987 .

[14]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[15]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Analogical transfer in very young children: combining two separately learned solutions to reach a goal. , 1986 .

[16]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events , 1985 .

[17]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  Ann L. Brown.  Analogical learning and transfer: what develops? , 1989 .

[19]  Zhe Chen,et al.  Positive and negative transfer in analogical problem solving by 6-year-old children , 1989 .

[20]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  A structure-mapping model for word problems. , 1987 .