Infant brain probability templates for MRI segmentation and normalization

Spatial normalization and segmentation of infant brain MRI data based on adult or pediatric reference data may not be appropriate due to the developmental differences between the infant input data and the reference data. In this study we have constructed infant templates and a priori brain tissue probability maps based on the MR brain image data from 76 infants ranging in age from 9 to 15 months. We employed two processing strategies to construct the infant template and a priori data: one processed with and one without using a priori data in the segmentation step. Using the templates we constructed, comparisons between the adult templates and the new infant templates are presented. Tissue distribution differences are apparent between the infant and adult template, particularly in the gray matter (GM) maps. The infant a priori information classifies brain tissue as GM with higher probability than adult data, at the cost of white matter (WM), which presents with lower probability when compared to adult data. The differences are more pronounced in the frontal regions and in the cingulate gyrus. Similar differences are also observed when the infant data is compared to a pediatric (age 5 to 18) template. The two-pass segmentation approach taken here for infant T1W brain images has provided high quality tissue probability maps for GM, WM, and CSF, in infant brain images. These templates may be used as prior probability distributions for segmentation and normalization; a key to improving the accuracy of these procedures in special populations.

[1]  H. Engeland,et al.  Variability in spatial normalization of pediatric and adult brain images , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  M Wilke,et al.  Normative pediatric brain data for spatial normalization and segmentation differs from standard adult data , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  J. Mugler,et al.  Three‐dimensional magnetization‐prepared rapid gradient‐echo imaging (3D MP RAGE) , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes , 1993, 1993 IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[5]  Marko Wilke,et al.  Variability of gray and white matter during normal development: a voxel-based MRI analysis , 2003, Neuroreport.

[6]  O. Muzik,et al.  Statistical Parametric Mapping: Assessment of Application in Children , 2000, NeuroImage.

[7]  Meritxell Bach Cuadra,et al.  Comparison and validation of tissue modelization and statistical classification methods in T1-weighted MR brain images , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Functional Neuroimaging of Speech Perception in Infants , 2002, Science.

[9]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Segmentation of brain MRI in young children. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[10]  Dirk Vandermeulen,et al.  Linear normalization of MR brain images in pediatric patients with periventricular leukomalacia , 2007, NeuroImage.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Unified segmentation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[12]  P. Huttenlocher Synaptic density in human frontal cortex - developmental changes and effects of aging. , 1979, Brain research.

[14]  J. Allsop,et al.  Quantification of Deep Gray Matter in Preterm Infants at Term-Equivalent Age Using Manual Volumetry of 3-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Images , 2007, Pediatrics.

[15]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  The Feasibility of a Common Stereotactic Space for Children and Adults in fMRI Studies of Development , 2002, NeuroImage.

[16]  Hamid Abrishami Moghaddam,et al.  A neonatal atlas template for spatial normalization of whole-brain magnetic resonance images of newborns: Preliminary results , 2007, NeuroImage.

[17]  Jean Meunier,et al.  Average Brain Models: A Convergence Study , 2000, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..