Capacity and price setting for dispersed, time-sensitive customer segments

Abstract We consider joint pricing and capacity decisions for a facility serving heterogeneous consumers that span a continuous range of locations, and are sensitive to time delays. Within this context, we analyze two contrasting service strategies: segmentation and pooling. Consumer segments differ with respect to their reservation prices and time sensitivities, and are dispersed over a single distance dimension. The firm serves these consumers using a process that we initially model as an M/M/1 queuing system. We analyze profit-maximizing price and capacity levels for a monopolist, and contrast the optimal segmentation and pooling policies. We find that when consumers are time sensitive, and can expect queuing delays at the firm’s facility (due to random arrival and service times), then scale economies from pooling can outweigh segmentation benefits. Yet, segmentation outperforms pooling when consumer segments differ substantively, in which case the firm can use capacity as a lever to price discriminate between the segments. Moreover, by contrasting a dedicated-services strategy, which directly targets specific segments and serves them separately, with the alternative of allowing consumers to self-select, we find that self-selection has a moderate negative influence on profits. We also examine the profit impact of employing alternative queuing systems, and find that a hybrid strategy based on a prioritized queuing discipline, that combines elements of segmentation (by offering different waiting times) and pooling (by sharing capacity across consumer segments), can outperform both the pure segmentation and pooling strategies.

[1]  Phillip J. Lederer,et al.  Retail Bank Services Strategy: A Model of Traditional, Electronic, and Mixed Distribution Choices , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Hemant K. Bhargava,et al.  Information Goods and Vertical Differentiation , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Gilbert Laporte,et al.  Competitive Location Models: A Framework and Bibliography , 1993, Transp. Sci..

[4]  Yew Sing Lee,et al.  Pricing and Delivery-Time Performance in a Competitive Environment , 1994 .

[5]  M. Shechter,et al.  A pricing policy for a computer facility with congestion externalities , 1979 .

[6]  Haim Mendelson,et al.  Pricing computer services: queueing effects , 1985, CACM.

[7]  Sampath Rajagopalan,et al.  Capacity planning with congestion effects , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Jacques-François Thisse,et al.  The Principle of Minimum Differentiation Holds under Sufficient Heterogeneity , 1985 .

[9]  Seungjin Whang,et al.  Cost allocation revisited: an optimality result , 1989 .

[10]  Gregory Dobson,et al.  Simultaneous price, location, and capacity decisions on a line of time‐sensitive customers , 2007 .

[11]  Albert Y. Ha,et al.  Incentive-Compatible Pricing for a Service Facility with Joint Production and Congestion Externalities , 1998 .

[12]  Kut C. So,et al.  Price and Time Competition for Service Delivery , 2000, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[13]  Dean H. Kropp,et al.  VOLUME AND CAPACITY INTERACTION IN FACILITY DESIGN , 1994 .

[14]  K. Moorthy,et al.  Product and Price Competition in a Duopoly , 1988 .

[15]  A. C. Pigou Economics of welfare , 1920 .

[16]  Richard C. Larson,et al.  Urban Operations Research , 1981 .

[17]  Haim Mendelson,et al.  Optimal Incentive-Compatible Priority Pricing for the M/M/1 Queue , 1990, Oper. Res..

[18]  H. Mendelson,et al.  User delay costs and internal pricing for a service facility , 1990 .

[19]  Phillip J. Lederer,et al.  Pricing, Production, Scheduling, and Delivery-Time Competition , 1997, Oper. Res..

[20]  Lawrence M. Wein,et al.  Analysis of a Decentralized Production-Inventory System , 2003, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[21]  S. Rosen,et al.  Monopoly and product quality , 1978 .

[22]  K. Moorthy Market Segmentation, Self-Selection, and Product Line Design , 1984 .

[23]  H. Hotelling Stability in Competition , 1929 .

[24]  Guy Latouche On the trade-off between queue congestion and server's reward in an M/M/1 queue☆ , 1980 .

[25]  Zvi Drezner,et al.  Location-allocation on a line with demand-dependent costs , 1996 .

[26]  Jr. Shaler Stidham Pricing and capacity decisions for a service facility: stability and multiple local optima , 1992 .

[27]  I. Png,et al.  Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions , 1992 .

[28]  Dilip Chhajed,et al.  Product Design with Multiple Quality-Type Attributes , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[29]  Steven J. Erlebacher,et al.  Lead-time setting, capacity utilization, and pricing decisions under lead-time dependent demand , 1998 .

[30]  A. Kwasnica,et al.  Competitive location and capacity decisions for firms serving time‐sensitive customers , 2008 .

[31]  Preyas S. Desai Quality Segmentation in Spatial Markets: When Does Cannibalization Affect Product Line Design? , 2001 .

[32]  Tamer Boyaci,et al.  Product Differentiation and Capacity Cost Interaction in Time and Price Sensitive Markets , 2003, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..