Promoting in vivo early angiogenesis with sub-micrometer strontium-contained bioactive microspheres through modulating macrophage phenotypes.

Early vascularization capacity of biomaterials plays an essential role in efficient wound healing and tissue regeneration, especially in large tissue tension implanting position such as bone augmentation. Strontium-contained silica-based bioactive materials have shown the role of promoting angiogenesis by stimulating osteoblasts to secrete angiogenesis related cytokines. However, osteoblasts have little effect on early angiogenesis due to the inflammatory reaction of implantation site. Here, for the first time, we found that the monodispersed strontium-contained bioactive glasses microspheres (SrBGM) could significantly promote the early angiogenesis through regulating macrophage phenotypes. After being stimulated with SrBGM in vitro, RAW cells (macrophages) presented a trend towards to M2 phenotype and expressed high level of platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB). Moreover, the RAW conditioned medium of SrBGM significantly enhanced the angiogenic capacity of HUVECs. The in vivo early vascularization studies showed that significant new vessels were observed at the center of SrBGM-based scaffolds after implantation for 1 week in a bone defect model of rats, suggesting their enhanced early vascularization. Due to the efficient vascularization, the in vivo new bone formation was promoted significantly. Our study may provide a novel strategy to promote the early vascularization of biomaterials through modulating the microphage phenotypes, which has wide applications in various tissue regeneration and wound healing.

[1]  Wenjie Zhang,et al.  A strontium-incorporated nanoporous titanium implant surface for rapid osseointegration. , 2016, Nanoscale.

[2]  Julian R Jones,et al.  Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[3]  C. Kielty,et al.  Platelet-derived growth factor receptors regulate mesenchymal stem cell fate: implications for neovascularization , 2010, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[4]  O. Fromigué,et al.  Calcium sensing receptor‐dependent and receptor‐independent activation of osteoblast replication and survival by strontium ranelate , 2009 .

[5]  W. Schaper,et al.  The temporal and spatial distribution of macrophage subpopulations during arteriogenesis. , 2012, Current vascular pharmacology.

[6]  P. Thomsen,et al.  Strontium-Doped Calcium Phosphate and Hydroxyapatite Granules Promote Different Inflammatory and Bone Remodelling Responses in Normal and Ovariectomised Rats , 2013, PloS one.

[7]  J. Nedelec,et al.  Effect of strontium-substituted biphasic calcium phosphate on inflammatory mediators production by human monocytes. , 2012, Acta biomaterialia.

[8]  J. Edwards,et al.  Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation , 2008, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[9]  Changqing Zhang,et al.  Three-dimensional printed strontium-containing mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds for repairing rat critical-sized calvarial defects. , 2015, Acta biomaterialia.

[10]  Jiang Chang,et al.  Multifunctional mesoporous bioactive glasses for effective delivery of therapeutic ions and drug/growth factors. , 2014, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[11]  Jiang Chang,et al.  Bioglass promotes wound healing through modulating the paracrine effects between macrophages and repairing cells. , 2017, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[12]  T. Koh,et al.  Macrophage‐based therapeutic strategies in regenerative medicine , 2017, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[13]  A. Fioravanti,et al.  What about strontium ranelate in osteoarthritis? Doubts and securities , 2014, Modern rheumatology.

[14]  Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic,et al.  Sequential delivery of immunomodulatory cytokines to facilitate the M1-to-M2 transition of macrophages and enhance vascularization of bone scaffolds. , 2015, Biomaterials.

[15]  E. Marcantonio,et al.  Bioactive Glass for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation , 2012, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[16]  Haobo Pan,et al.  Enhanced osteoporotic bone regeneration by strontium-substituted calcium silicate bioactive ceramics. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[17]  Aldo R Boccaccini,et al.  Effect of bioactive glasses on angiogenesis: a review of in vitro and in vivo evidences. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[18]  Xiaofeng Chen,et al.  Strontium-Substituted Submicrometer Bioactive Glasses Modulate Macrophage Responses for Improved Bone Regeneration. , 2016, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[19]  C. Serhan,et al.  The resolution code of acute inflammation: Novel pro-resolving lipid mediators in resolution. , 2015, Seminars in immunology.

[20]  F. Kloss,et al.  Effect of strontium surface-functionalized implants on early and late osseointegration: A histological, spectrometric and tomographic evaluation. , 2018, Acta biomaterialia.

[21]  Lintao Cai,et al.  Strontium Enhances Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and In Vivo Bone Formation by Activating Wnt/Catenin Signaling , 2011, Stem cells.

[22]  Narutoshi Hibino,et al.  A critical role for macrophages in neovessel formation and the development of stenosis in tissue‐engineered vascular grafts , 2011, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[23]  Esther J. Lee,et al.  Synthetic biodegradable hydrogel delivery of demineralized bone matrix for bone augmentation in a rat model. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[24]  Peter X. Ma,et al.  Monodisperse photoluminescent and highly biocompatible bioactive glass nanoparticles for controlled drug delivery and cell imaging. , 2015, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[25]  J. Simon,et al.  Immune responses to implants - a review of the implications for the design of immunomodulatory biomaterials. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[26]  M. Mozafari,et al.  Bioactive Glasses: Sprouting Angiogenesis in Tissue Engineering. , 2018, Trends in biotechnology.

[27]  Youn-Jeong Kim,et al.  Modulating macrophage polarization with divalent cations in nanostructured titanium implant surfaces , 2016, Nanotechnology.

[28]  K. Freier,et al.  The use of self-inflating soft tissue expanders prior to bone augmentation of atrophied alveolar ridges. , 2015, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[29]  S. Goodman,et al.  Inflammation, fracture and bone repair. , 2016, Bone.

[30]  Xiaofeng Chen,et al.  Synergistic effect of strontium and silicon in strontium-substituted sub-micron bioactive glass for enhanced osteogenesis. , 2018, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[31]  A. Boccaccini,et al.  Towards the synthesis of an Mg-containing silicate glass–ceramic to be used as a scaffold for cementum/alveolar bone regeneration , 2014 .

[32]  Mikaël M. Martino,et al.  Promoting tissue regeneration by modulating the immune system. , 2017, Acta biomaterialia.

[33]  Xiaoran Li,et al.  Binary Doping of Strontium and Copper Enhancing Osteogenesis and Angiogenesis of Bioactive Glass Nanofibers while Suppressing Osteoclast Activity. , 2017, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[34]  Min Wang,et al.  Europium Doped Monodispersed Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles Regulate the Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells. , 2018, Journal of biomedical nanotechnology.

[35]  Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic,et al.  Macrophages modulate the viability and growth of human mesenchymal stem cells , 2013, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[36]  B. Lei,et al.  Monodispersed Bioactive Glass Nanoclusters with Ultralarge Pores and Intrinsic Exceptionally High miRNA Loading for Efficiently Enhancing Bone Regeneration , 2017, Advanced healthcare materials.

[37]  Zhipeng Gu,et al.  Application of strontium-doped calcium polyphosphate scaffold on angiogenesis for bone tissue engineering , 2013, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[38]  Li Li,et al.  A promising wound dressing material with excellent cytocompatibility and proangiogenesis action for wound healing: Strontium loaded Silk fibroin/Sodium alginate (SF/SA) blend films. , 2017, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[39]  Zhipeng Gu,et al.  Stimulations of strontium-doped calcium polyphosphate for bone tissue engineering to protein secretion and mRNA expression of the angiogenic growth factors from endothelial cells in vitro , 2014 .

[40]  Jun Shi,et al.  Effect of titanium implants with strontium incorporation on bone apposition in animal models: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[41]  M. Pilmane,et al.  Does Local Application of Strontium Increase Osteogenesis and Biomaterial Osteointegration in Osteoporotic and Other Bone Tissue Conditions: Review of Literature , 2016 .

[42]  A. Khademhosseini,et al.  Delivery strategies to control inflammatory response: Modulating M1-M2 polarization in tissue engineering applications. , 2016, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[43]  A. Greene Current concepts of vascular anomalies. , 2012, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[44]  I. Cacciotti Bivalent cationic ions doped bioactive glasses: the influence of magnesium, zinc, strontium and copper on the physical and biological properties , 2017, Journal of Materials Science.

[45]  Julian R. Jones,et al.  Strategies to direct vascularisation using mesoporous bioactive glass-based biomaterials for bone regeneration , 2017 .

[46]  J. Quigley,et al.  Angiogenic capacity of M1- and M2-polarized macrophages is determined by the levels of TIMP-1 complexed with their secreted proMMP-9. , 2013, Blood.

[47]  F. Baino,et al.  Electrophoretic deposition of spray-dried Sr-containing mesoporous bioactive glass spheres on glass–ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration , 2017, Journal of Materials Science.

[48]  S. Verbruggen,et al.  Anti-inflammatory M2, but not pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages promote angiogenesis in vivo , 2013, Angiogenesis.

[49]  Chengtie Wu,et al.  The synergistic effects of Sr and Si bioactive ions on osteogenesis, osteoclastogenesis and angiogenesis for osteoporotic bone regeneration. , 2017, Acta biomaterialia.

[50]  Xinquan Jiang,et al.  M2 macrophages contribute to osteogenesis and angiogenesis on nanotubular TiO2 surfaces. , 2017, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[51]  J. Locs,et al.  Strontium and strontium ranelate: Historical review of some of their functions. , 2017, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[52]  Chengtie Wu,et al.  Osteoimmunomodulation for the development of advanced bone biomaterials , 2016 .

[53]  M. Mozafari,et al.  Strontium- and cobalt-substituted bioactive glasses seeded with human umbilical cord perivascular cells to promote bone regeneration via enhanced osteogenic and angiogenic activities. , 2017, Acta biomaterialia.

[54]  Peter X. Ma,et al.  Development of a Multifunctional Platform Based on Strong, Intrinsically Photoluminescent and Antimicrobial Silica‐Poly(citrates)‐Based Hybrid Biodegradable Elastomers for Bone Regeneration , 2015 .

[55]  Narutoshi Hibino,et al.  Tissue-engineered vascular grafts transform into mature blood vessels via an inflammation-mediated process of vascular remodeling , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Aldo R Boccaccini,et al.  A review of the biological response to ionic dissolution products from bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[57]  Molly M. Stevens,et al.  Sparse feature selection methods identify unexpected global cellular response to strontium-containing materials , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  Kerry A. Daly,et al.  Macrophage phenotype as a predictor of constructive remodeling following the implantation of biologically derived surgical mesh materials. , 2012, Acta biomaterialia.

[59]  L. Cooper,et al.  Macrophage cell lines produce osteoinductive signals that include bone morphogenetic protein-2. , 2002, Bone.

[60]  Vunjak-NovakovicGordana,et al.  Biomimetic Approaches for Bone Tissue Engineering. , 2016 .