Understanding natural cause: children's explanations of how objects and their properties originate.

An understanding of natural cause includes the realization that events can occur independently of human activity or intentions. It also often entails realizing that causal mechanisms can be nonobservable or nonobvious. The present research investigated to what extent children ages 4-7 have developed a concept of natural cause. Study 1 examined children's understandings of object origins (e.g., how the sun began); Study 2 probed children's causal understandings of object behaviors and properties (e.g., why rabbits hop and have long ears). In both studies, children by age 4 were sensitive to the natural kind-artifact distinction in their explanations. They mentioned human intervention for human-made artifacts but rarely for naturally occurring things. Moreover, subjects at all ages were able to identify specific kinds of natural cause, including intrinsic causes (such as growth) and inborn nature. Finally, subjects understood the link between nonobvious, internal parts and self-generated activity (e.g., that bones are important for the flight of a bird). Altogether, these results suggest that even preschool children realize that natural causes exist. They contradict Piaget's characterization of young children as artificialistic (believing that naturally occurring things are created by people) and as focused on observable properties.

[1]  J. Piaget The Child's Conception of Physical Causality , 1927 .

[2]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Child's Conception of the World , 1971 .

[3]  M. L. Nass The effects of three variables on children's concepts of physical causality. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[4]  W. Montague,et al.  Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms , 1969 .

[5]  Effects of Probing Children's Phenomenistic Explanations of Cause and Effect. , 1970 .

[6]  Michael D. Berzonsky,et al.  The role of familiarity in children's explanations of physical causality. , 1971 .

[7]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[8]  John V. Thiruvathukal,et al.  Elements of Oceanography , 1976 .

[9]  The Physics of everyday phenomena: Readings from Scientific American , 1979 .

[10]  Thomas R. Shultz,et al.  Development of the ability to distinguish intended actions from mistakes, reflexes, and passive movements , 1980 .

[11]  E. Spelke,et al.  The development of thoughts about animate and inanimate objects: Implications for research in social cognition , 1981 .

[12]  A. Leslie The Perception of Causality in Infants , 1982, Perception.

[13]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  WHAT PRESCHOOLERS KNOW ABOUT ANIMATE AND INANIMATE OBJECTS , 1983 .

[14]  The Dynamic Universe: An Introduction to Astronomy , 1983 .

[15]  R. Siegler,et al.  The Effects of Task Requirements on Children's Life Judgments. , 1984 .

[16]  Douglas A. Behrend,et al.  Children's knowledge about animates and inanimates , 1984 .

[17]  S. Carey Conceptual Change in Childhood , 1985 .

[18]  R. Siegler,et al.  Children's understandings of the attributes of life. , 1986, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[19]  S. Sugarman,et al.  Piaget under Scrutiny. (Book Reviews: Piaget's Construction of the Child's Reality) , 1987 .

[20]  S. Gelman The development of induction within natural kind and artifact categories , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  H. Wellman,et al.  Children's understanding of the nonobvious. , 1988 .

[22]  R. Gelman,et al.  Preschooler's Ability to Decide Whether a Photographed Unfamiliar Object Can Move Itself. , 1988 .

[23]  R. Gelman First Principles Organize Attention to and Learning About Relevant Data: Number and the Animate‐Inanimate Distinction as Examples , 1990 .

[24]  H. Wellman The Child's Theory of Mind , 1990 .

[25]  F. Keil Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development , 1989 .