Mammographic breast density refines Tyrer-Cuzick estimates of breast cancer risk in high-risk women: findings from the placebo arm of the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study I

IntroductionMammographic density is well-established as a risk factor for breast cancer, however, adjustment for age and body mass index (BMI) is vital to its clinical interpretation when assessing individual risk. In this paper we develop a model to adjust mammographic density for age and BMI and show how this adjusted mammographic density measure might be used with existing risk prediction models to identify high-risk women more precisely.MethodsWe explored the association between age, BMI, visually assessed percent dense area and breast cancer risk in a nested case-control study of women from the placebo arm of the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study I (72 cases, 486 controls). Linear regression was used to adjust mammographic density for age and BMI. This adjusted measure was evaluated in a multivariable logistic regression model that included the Tyrer-Cuzick (TC) risk score, which is based on classical breast cancer risk factors.ResultsPercent dense area adjusted for age and BMI (the density residual) was a stronger measure of breast cancer risk than unadjusted percent dense area (odds ratio per standard deviation 1.55 versus 1.38; area under the curve (AUC) 0.62 versus 0.59). Furthermore, in this population at increased risk of breast cancer, the density residual added information beyond that obtained from the TC model alone, with the AUC for the model containing both TC risk and density residual being 0.62 compared to 0.51 for the model containing TC risk alone (P =0.002).Approximately 16% of controls and 19% of cases moved into the highest risk group (8% or more absolute risk of developing breast cancer within 10 years) when the density residual was taken into account. The net reclassification index was +15.7%.ConclusionsIn women at high risk of breast cancer, adjusting percent mammographic density for age and BMI provides additional predictive information to the TC risk score, which already incorporates BMI, age, family history and other classic breast cancer risk factors. Furthermore, simple selection criteria can be developed using mammographic density, age and BMI to identify women at increased risk in a clinical setting.Clinical trial registration numberhttp://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN91879928 (Registered: 1 June 2006).

[1]  J. Mackay IBIS investigators. First results from the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS-1) - a randomised prevention trial , 2002 .

[2]  D. English,et al.  Associations of mammographic dense and nondense areas and body mass index with risk of breast cancer. , 2014, American journal of epidemiology.

[3]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Using Clinical Factors and Mammographic Breast Density to Estimate Breast Cancer Risk: Development and Validation of a New Predictive Model , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[4]  Anna Chiarelli,et al.  Body Size, Mammographic Density, and Breast Cancer Risk , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[5]  L. Lin,et al.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. , 1989, Biometrics.

[6]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  Jinbo Chen,et al.  Projecting absolute invasive breast cancer risk in white women with a model that includes mammographic density. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  J. Cuzick,et al.  Long-term results of tamoxifen prophylaxis for breast cancer--96-month follow-up of the randomized IBIS-I trial. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  Jack Cuzick,et al.  Clinical and epidemiological issues in mammographic density , 2012, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[10]  Mary Wilson,et al.  Assessing Individual Breast Cancer Risk within the U.K. National Health Service Breast Screening Program: A New Paradigm for Cancer Prevention , 2012, Cancer Prevention Research.

[11]  H. Welch,et al.  Overdiagnosis in cancer. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  Stephen W Duffy,et al.  A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors , 2004, Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice.

[13]  Kathleen F. Kerr,et al.  Testing for improvement in prediction model performance , 2013, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  Mitchell H Gail,et al.  Comparing breast cancer risk assessment models. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  V. McCormack,et al.  Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[16]  C C Bird,et al.  Morphometric studies of age related changes in normal human breast and their significance for evolution of mammary cancer. , 1985, Journal of clinical pathology.

[17]  L. Newman,et al.  Assessing breast cancer risk: evolution of the Gail Model. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  M Baum,et al.  First results from the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS-I): a randomised prevention trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[19]  S. Duffy,et al.  Tamoxifen-induced reduction in mammographic density and breast cancer risk reduction: a nested case-control study. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[20]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  Konstantin Strauch,et al.  Breast cancer risk assessment across the risk continuum: genetic and nongenetic risk factors contributing to differential model performance , 2012, Breast Cancer Research.

[22]  K. Krippendorff Bivariate Agreement Coefficients for Reliability of Data , 1970 .

[23]  S. Cummings,et al.  Mammographic Breast Density and the Gail Model for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction in a Screening Population , 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.