A social capital paradox: Entrepreneurial dynamism in a small world clean technology cluster

Abstract Clean tech entrepreneurs have struggled to gain investor confidence because of some particular characteristics and circumstances of the industry. This research combines network and sustainable development literature in the clean tech context to support the logic of a new investment approach that may stimulate sustainable investing in clean tech. Theory is proposed to suggest that there may be an advantageous social capital paradox where strong ties in a cluster lead to dynamism rather than decay. The clean tech industry provides a context where strong ties offer network stability in a small world cluster such that it is a value-creating organizational form offering greater dynamism. Two related propositions are developed to support the social capital paradox. They lead to a theoretical conclusion that long term integrated partner solutions where partners are also resource constrained lead to successful alliances supporting a dynamic cluster that will grow over time. A practical conclusion is that investing in a connected cluster of firms might be less risky compared to investing in a new firm or even a portfolio of well diversified assets. De-risking clean production investments may be achievable through a small world network cluster-backed security.

[1]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Community Structure in Large Networks: Natural Cluster Sizes and the Absence of Large Well-Defined Clusters , 2008, Internet Math..

[2]  G. Hamel Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[3]  R. Gulati Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .

[4]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  The Small worlds of Strategic Technology Alliances , 2004 .

[5]  D. Lange High-Tech Cluster Revolution from an Organizational Ecology Perspective , 2011 .

[6]  R. Gulati Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis , 1995 .

[7]  R. Bettis Performance differences in related and unrelated diversified firms , 1981 .

[8]  G. Mulder,et al.  Building for big pharma , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  Wenpin Tsai Social Structure of Coopetition Within a Multiunit Organization: Coordination, Competition, and Intraorganizational Knowledge Sharing , 2002 .

[10]  Antonio Capaldo Network Structure and Innovation: The Leveraging of a Dual Network as a Distinctive Relational Capability , 2006 .

[11]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Small Worlds and Regional Innovation , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[12]  P. Bourdieu Forms of Capital , 2002 .

[13]  David Obstfeld Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation , 2005 .

[14]  B. Richardson CLIMATE FINANCE AND ITS GOVERNANCE: MOVING TO A LOW CARBON ECONOMY THROUGH SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FINANCING? , 2009, International and Comparative Law Quarterly.

[15]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  B. Kogut,et al.  Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network , 1997 .

[17]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[18]  A. Ariño Measures of strategic alliance performance: an analysis of construct validity , 2003 .

[19]  R. Gulati Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[20]  A. Huhtala Promoting financing of cleaner production investments—UNEP experience , 2003 .

[21]  Andrea L. Larson Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships , 1992 .

[22]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  B. Truffer The need for a global perspective on sustainability transitions , 2012 .

[24]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[25]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  The Rise and Fall of Small Worlds: Exploring the Dynamics of Social Structure , 2013 .

[26]  Michael J. Bradshaw,et al.  Global energy dilemmas: a geographical perspective , 2010 .

[27]  Masachika Suzuki,et al.  Identifying roles of international institutions in clean energy technology innovation and diffusion in the developing countries: matching barriers with roles of the institutions , 2015 .

[28]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Bilateral Collaboration and the Emergence of Innovation Networks , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[29]  Paola Antonelli,et al.  A network analysis using metadata to investigate innovation in clean-tech – Implications for energy policy , 2015 .

[30]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Network-Independent Partner Selection and the Evolution of Innovation Networks , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[31]  A. O’Rourke,et al.  The message and methods of ethical investment , 2003 .

[32]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Where Do Small Worlds Come From? , 2003 .

[33]  B. Kogut,et al.  The Small World of Germany and the Durability of National Networks , 2001, American Sociological Review.

[34]  Lars Coenen,et al.  The role of transnational dimensions in emerging economy 'Technological Innovation Systems' for clean-tech , 2015 .

[35]  A. Portes Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[36]  André F. Perold,et al.  Large-Scale Portfolio Optimization , 1984 .

[37]  Jitendra V. Singh Performance, Slack, and Risk Taking in Organizational Decision Making , 1986 .

[38]  Jie Wu,et al.  Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness , 2003 .

[39]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Friends or Strangers? Firm-Specific Uncertainty, Market Uncertainty, and Network Partner Selection , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[40]  R. Gulati Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation ? , 2007 .

[41]  Josh Whitford,et al.  The Anatomy of Network Failure* , 2011 .

[42]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective , 2004 .

[43]  E. Jackson Interrogating the theory of change: evaluating impact investing where it matters most , 2013 .

[44]  A. Greif Contract Enforceability and Economic Institutions in Early Trade: the Maghribi Traders' Coalition , 1993 .

[45]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[46]  Dean M. Behrens,et al.  Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries , 2000 .

[47]  Geoffrey G. Bell Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness , 2005 .

[48]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[49]  N. Lin Buidling a Network Theory of Social Capital , 1999, Connections.

[50]  Vicki Norberg-Bohm,et al.  Technology policy and renewable energy: public roles in the development of new energy technologies , 1999 .

[51]  L. Loury,et al.  Affirmative action in higher education , 1993 .

[52]  N. Coviello The network dynamics of international new ventures , 2006 .

[53]  R. Gulati,et al.  The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope , 1998 .

[54]  Vikas A. Aggarwal,et al.  Governing collaborative activity: interdependence and the impact of coordination and exploration , 2011 .

[55]  R. Burt Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[56]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Patterned Interactions in Complex Systems: Implications for Exploration , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[57]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Alliance capability, stock market response, and long‐term alliance success: the role of the alliance function , 2002 .

[58]  Erik L. Olson Green innovation value chain analysis of PV solar power , 2014 .

[59]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[60]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[61]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[62]  P. Pattison,et al.  Small and Other Worlds: Global Network Structures from Local Processes1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[63]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Which renewable energy policy is a venture capitalist's best friend? Empirical evidence from a survey of international cleantech investors , 2009 .

[64]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[65]  Corey C. Phelps,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[66]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities , 1999 .

[67]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[68]  V. Eguíluz,et al.  Cooperation and the Emergence of Role Differentiation in the Dynamics of Social Networks1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[69]  P. Pattison,et al.  9. Neighborhood-Based Models for Social Networks , 2002 .

[70]  J. Johanson,et al.  Business Relationship Learning and Commitment in the Internationalization Process , 2003 .

[71]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  Two's Company, Three's a Crowd? Triads in Cooperative-Competitive Networks , 2007 .

[72]  Nancy Bocken,et al.  Sustainable venture capital e catalyst for sustainable start-up success? , 2015 .

[73]  Nitin Nohria,et al.  Local Versus Global Mimetism: The Dynamics of Alliance Formation in the Automobile Industry , 2002 .