Specimen quality evaluation in Canadian biobanks participating in the COEUR repository.

Human biological specimens are important for translational research programs such as the Canadian Ovarian Experimental Unified Resource (COEUR) funded by the Terry Fox Research Institute. Sample quality is an important consideration, as it directly impacts the quality of ensuing research. The aim of the present study was to determine the quality of tissues collected from different sites contributing to the COEUR cohort. Samples from high-grade serous ovarian tumors (fresh frozen and corresponding paraffin-embedded tissues) were provided by nine participating Canadian biobanks. All samples were shipped to a central site using a Standard Operating Protocol (SOP). DNA and RNA extraction was conducted by the quality control division of the Canadian Tumor Repository Network (CTRNet). DNA quality was determined by ß-globin gene PCR amplification, and RNA quality by the RNA integrity number (RIN), as measured by the Agilent BioAnalyzer. DNA of acceptable quality had at least three bands of ß-globin amplified from DNA (n=115/135), and a RIN number ≥7 was considered very good for RNA (n=80/135). Sample preparation and storage time had little effect on RNA or DNA quality. Protein expression was assessed on tissue microarray by immunohistochemistry with antibodies against p53, WT1, E-cadherin, CK-7, and Ki67 from formalin fixed-paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissues. As seen with a nonhierarchical clustering statistical method, there was no significant difference in immunostaining of paraffin tissues among specimens from different biobanks. Interestingly, patients with worse outcome were highly positive for p53 and weak for WT1. In conclusion, while there was no common SOP for retrospectively collected material across Canadian biobanks, these results indicate that specimens collected at these multiple sites are of comparable quality, and can serve as an adequate resource to create a national cohort for the validation of molecular biomarkers in ovarian cancer.

[1]  T. Khoury Delay to Formalin Fixation Alters Morphology and Immunohistochemistry for Breast Carcinoma , 2012, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[2]  C Blake Gilks,et al.  Patterns of p53 immunoreactivity in endometrial carcinomas: ‘all or nothing’ staining is of importance , 2011, Histopathology.

[3]  M. Rubin,et al.  Biobanking after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a quality assessment of providing prostate tissue for RNA studies , 2011, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[4]  S. Leung,et al.  Calculator for ovarian carcinoma subtype prediction , 2011, Modern Pathology.

[5]  Samuel Leung,et al.  Diagnosis of Ovarian Carcinoma Cell Type is Highly Reproducible: A Transcanadian Study , 2010, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[6]  W. Gerald,et al.  Biobanking of Human Pancreas Cancer Tissue: Impact of Ex-Vivo Procurement Times on RNA Quality , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[7]  A. Mes-Masson,et al.  Characterization of the molecular differences between ovarian endometrioid carcinoma and ovarian serous carcinoma , 2010, The Journal of pathology.

[8]  F. Carey,et al.  Gene expression in colorectal neoplasia: modifications induced by tissue ischaemic time and tissue handling protocol , 2010, Histopathology.

[9]  Jochen Gaedcke,et al.  Impact of RNA degradation on gene expression profiling , 2010, BMC Medical Genomics.

[10]  L. De Cecco,et al.  Impact of biospecimens handling on biomarker research in breast cancer , 2009, BMC Cancer.

[11]  H. Shim,et al.  Prognostic significance of paired epithelial cell adhesion molecule and E-cadherin in ovarian serous carcinoma. , 2009, Human pathology.

[12]  D. Huntsman,et al.  A Limited Panel of Immunomarkers Can Reliably Distinguish Between Clear Cell and High-grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary , 2009, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[13]  C. Dumur,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Tissue Devitalization Time on Genome-wide Gene Expression Analysis in Ovarian Tumor Samples , 2008, Diagnostic molecular pathology : the American journal of surgical pathology, part B.

[14]  Rebecca O Barnes,et al.  Influence of Evolution in Tumor Biobanking on the Interpretation of Translational Research , 2008, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[15]  S. Leung,et al.  Ovarian Carcinoma Subtypes Are Different Diseases: Implications for Biomarker Studies , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[16]  S. Hankinson,et al.  Validation of Tissue Microarray Technology in Ovarian Cancer: Results from the Nurses' Health Study , 2008, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[17]  Nhu Le,et al.  Tumor cell type can be reproducibly diagnosed and is of independent prognostic significance in patients with maximally debulked ovarian carcinoma. , 2008, Human pathology.

[18]  S. Leung,et al.  Mixed Ovarian Epithelial Carcinomas With Clear Cell and Serous Components are Variants of High-grade Serous Carcinoma: An Interobserver Correlative and Immunohistochemical Study of 32 Cases , 2008, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[19]  W. McCluggage,et al.  My approach to and thoughts on the typing of ovarian carcinomas , 2007, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[20]  Mark F. Munsell,et al.  Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability of a Two-tier System for Grading Ovarian Serous Carcinoma , 2007, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[21]  J. Inazawa,et al.  Clinicopathological significance of WT1 expression in ovarian cancer: a possible accelerator of tumor progression in serous adenocarcinoma , 2007, Virchows Archiv.

[22]  Qihua Tan,et al.  RNA quality and gene expression analysis of ovarian tumor tissue undergoing repeated thaw-freezing. , 2007, Experimental and molecular pathology.

[23]  V. Kosma,et al.  Prognostic significance of E-cadherin–catenin complex in epithelial ovarian cancer , 2006, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[24]  C. Michener,et al.  Modern Management of Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma , 2005 .

[25]  C. Michener,et al.  Modern management of recurrent ovarian carcinoma. A systematic approach to a chronic disease. , 2005, Oncology.

[26]  C. Lopes,et al.  Prognostic value of E-cadherin immunoexpression in patients with primary ovarian carcinomas. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[27]  C. Gilks,et al.  Subclassification of Ovarian Surface Epithelial Tumors Based on Correlation of Histologic and Molecular Pathologic Data , 2004, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[28]  J. Lundin,et al.  Distinct subtypes of serous ovarian carcinoma identified by p53 determination. , 2003, Gynecologic oncology.

[29]  J. Scoazec,et al.  Expression of cadherins in benign, borderline, and malignant ovarian epithelial tumors: a clinicopathologic study of 60 cases. , 1997, Human pathology.