Factors influencing the number of applications submitted per applicant to orthopedic residency programs

Background From 2002 to 2014, the orthopedic surgery residency applicant pool increased by 25% while the number of applications submitted per applicant rose by 69%, resulting in an increase of 109% in the number of applications received per program. Objective This study aimed to identify applicant factors associated with an increased number of applications to orthopedic surgery residency programs. Design An anonymous survey was sent to all applicants applying to the orthopedic surgery residency program at Loyola University. Questions were designed to define the number of applications submitted per respondent as well as the strength of their application. Of 733 surveys sent, 140 (19.1%) responses were received. Setting An academic institution in Maywood, IL. Participants Fourth-year medical students applying to the orthopedic surgery residency program at Loyola University. Results An applicant's perception of how competitive he or she was (applicants who rated themselves as ‘average’ submitted more applications than those who rated themselves as either ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’, p=0.001) and the number of away rotations (those who completed >2 away rotations submitted more applications, p=0.03) were significantly associated with an increased number of applications submitted. No other responses were found to be associated with an increased number of applications submitted. Conclusion Less qualified candidates are not applying to significantly more programs than their more qualified counterparts. The increasing number of applications represents a financial strain on the applicant, given the costs required to apply to more programs, and a time burden on individual programs to screen increasing numbers of applicants. In order to stabilize or reverse this alarming trend, orthopedic surgery residency programs should openly disclose admission criteria to prospective candidates, and medical schools should provide additional guidance for candidates in this process.

[1]  R. Avedian,et al.  The Effect of Applicant Publication Volume on the Orthopaedic Residency Match. , 2016, Journal of surgical education.

[2]  J. Mayerson,et al.  Is orthopedics more competitive today than when my attending matched? An analysis of National Resident Matching Program data for orthopedic PGY1 applicants from 1984 to 2011. , 2014, Journal of surgical education.

[3]  Joshua C. Patt,et al.  What Factors Influence Applicants’ Rankings of Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs in the National Resident Matching Program? , 2014, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  S. Scherl CORR Insights: Orthopaedic Residency Applications Increase After Implementation of 80-hour Workweek , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  W. Levine,et al.  Orthopaedic Residency Applications Increase After Implementation of 80-hour Workweek , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  K. Baldwin,et al.  Are Away Rotations Critical for a Successful Match in Orthopaedic Surgery? , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  K. Carmichael,et al.  What Attributes are Necessary to Be Selected for an Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Position: Perceptions of Faculty and Residents , 2004, Southern medical journal.

[8]  K. Schechtman,et al.  How competitive is my surgical specialty? , 2002, American journal of surgery.

[9]  J. Zuckerman,et al.  An analysis of orthopaedic residency selection criteria. , 2002, Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.)).