The Effect of Organizational Communication Media on Organizational Culture and Performance: An Agent-Based Simulation Model

This paper examines the mutual relationship between the communication richness of media used for conducting organizational communication and organizational culture. The richness of the media influences how well the organization might maintain its culture. On the other hand, a strong organizational culture allows a more effective use of the media by providing members with some of the necessary common ground to better understand the information exchanged. These relationships are investigated using an agent-based simulation model (ABM). Our ABM incorporates many partial theories into a coherent and fully defined model, which helps formalize and integrate those theories. Our model allows us to analyze non-linearities and interaction effects, which are difficult to investigate using other techniques. Additionally, the ABM allows us to investigate the dynamics of the phenomenon and generate hypotheses that could then be tested using empirical studies. Given the substantial resources necessary to conduct empirical studies, we think that the present ABM is valuable in helping guide data collection efforts. In this paper, we present results that show that organizational culture can influence the effectiveness of the media used for organizational communication and that a high media richness can help maintain and stabilize a culture. The effect of media richness on organizational culture depends on the initial strength of the culture. In general, for a given richness of the media, an initially strong culture stabilizes faster and becomes stronger through time than an initially weak culture. Additionally, the model suggests that a stable network of contacts among agents fosters a high achievement of organizational tasks. Conversely, when agents are forced to establish contacts with agents outside the usual network for doing their work, the accomplishment of tasks decreases.

[1]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[2]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[3]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The Bases and Use of Power in Organizational Decision Making: The Case of a University. , 1974 .

[4]  Ederyn Williams,et al.  Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. , 1977 .

[5]  E. Jacobson,et al.  Organizational communication network analysis: The liaison communication role , 1977 .

[6]  George P. Huber,et al.  Organizational Information Systems: Determinants of Their Performance and Behavior , 1982 .

[7]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[8]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[9]  KieslerSara,et al.  Reducing Social Context Cues , 1986 .

[10]  S. Kiesler The hidden messages in computer networks , 1986 .

[11]  Robert G. Sargent A tutorial on validation and verification of simulation models , 1988, WSC '88.

[12]  A. Stinchcombe Information and Organizations , 2019 .

[13]  D. Denison,et al.  Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness. , 1991 .

[14]  Vijay Gurbaxani,et al.  The impact of information systems on organizations and markets , 1991, CACM.

[15]  Jennifer A. Chatman Matching People and Organizations: Selection and Socialization in Public Accounting Firms , 1989 .

[16]  Allen S. Lee Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation , 1994, MIS Q..

[17]  B A Huberman,et al.  Evolutionary games and computer simulations. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Extensions to media richness theory: a test of the task-media fit hypothesis , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[19]  Pat Fung,et al.  Constructing the Networked Organization: Content and Context in the Development of Electronic Communications , 1995 .

[20]  James L. McKenney,et al.  Social Context and Interaction in Ongoing Computer-Supported Management Groups , 1995 .

[21]  G. DeSanctis,et al.  Electronic Communication and Changing Organizational Forms , 1995 .

[22]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment. , 1996 .

[23]  B. Mark Organizational culture. , 1996, Annual review of nursing research.

[24]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning , 1997, MIS Q..

[25]  Richard Bronson,et al.  Computer simulated empirical tests of social theory : lessons from 15 years' experience , 1997 .

[26]  Robert Axelrod,et al.  Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences , 1997, Complex..

[27]  S. Kanungo An empirical study of organizational culture and network-based computer use , 1998 .

[28]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science , 1999, Organization Science.

[30]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[31]  Henry C. W. Lau,et al.  A measurement‐communication‐recognition framework of corporate culture change: An empirical study , 2002 .

[32]  Richard E. Potter,et al.  Virtual team interaction styles: assessment and effects , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[33]  Alan D. Smith,et al.  Communication and loyalty among knowledge workers: a resource of the firm theory view , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..

[34]  B. Baltes,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication and Group Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis , 2002 .

[35]  Thomas J. Schriber,et al.  Computer-mediated communication and organizational culture: a survey-based study and agent-based simulation model , 2002 .

[36]  Margarete Boos,et al.  Enhancing Mutual Understanding in Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication by Training , 2003, Commun. Res..

[37]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[38]  Anne H. Anderson,et al.  Adapting communicative strategies to computer mediated communication: an analysis of task performance and dialogue structure , 2003 .

[39]  Bradley J. Alge,et al.  When does the medium matter? Knowledge-building experiences and opportunities in decision-making teams , 2003 .