A framework for understanding and improving multisite evaluations

Multisite evaluations are increasingly being used by the federal government and large foundations. A framework for understanding the variations among multisite evaluations and developing ways to improve them is presented in this chapter.

[1]  M. Dennis,et al.  Twenty-five strategies for improving the design, implementation and analysis of health services research related to alcohol and other drug abuse treatment. , 2000, Addiction.

[2]  C. Meinert Clinical Trials: Design, Conduct, and Analysis , 1986 .

[3]  H. Kraemer,et al.  Pitfalls of multisite randomized clinical trials of efficacy and effectiveness. , 2000, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[4]  B. Flay Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. , 1986, Preventive medicine.

[5]  D. Kershaw,et al.  The New Jersey income-maintenance experiment , 1976 .

[6]  G. de Leon,et al.  Adolescents in Therapeutic Communities: One-Year Posttreatment Outcomes , 2000, Journal of psychoactive drugs.

[7]  Y. Hser,et al.  Program Variation in Treatment Outcomes Among Women in Residential Drug Treatment , 2000, Evaluation review.

[8]  C E Phelps,et al.  Some interim results from a controlled trial of cost sharing in health insurance. , 1981, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  B. Flay,et al.  Phases of alcohol problem prevention research. , 1999, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[10]  D. Luchins,et al.  Cross-Site Issues in the Collaborative Program to Prevent Homelessness: Conclusion , 1999 .

[11]  J. Herrell,et al.  Factors affecting client response to HIV outreach efforts. , 2001, Journal of substance abuse.

[12]  E. Davidson,et al.  Ascertaining causality in theory‐based evaluation , 2000 .

[13]  Blaine R. Worthen,et al.  Conceptual Challenges Confronting Cluster Evaluation , 1997 .

[14]  Zoe A. Barley,et al.  Cluster Evaluation: A Method to Strengthen Evaluation in Smaller Programs with Similar Purposes , 1993 .