Pipe Sizing for Novel Heat Distribution Technology

This paper assesses pipe sizing aspects for previously proposed, novel, low heat distribution technology with three pipes. Assessment issues include heat loss, pressure loss, and pipe sizing for different typical pipe configurations. This assessment has been provided by the analysis of a case area with single-family houses. Concerning heat loss, the proposed three-pipe solutions have the same magnitude of heat loss as conventional twin pipes, since lower return temperatures compensate for the larger heat loss area from the third pipe. Regarding pressure loss, the main restriction on the size of the third pipe is limited to the pressure loss in the third pipe. Thermostatic valves to manage the flow rate of the third pipe are advocated, since alternative small pumps have not been found to be commercially available. The pipe sizing recommendation is that the third pipe for recirculation purposes can be two to three standard pipe sizes smaller than the corresponding supply and return pipe, if no prosumer is connected in the heat distribution network.

[1]  G. Hellström,et al.  Multipole method to compute the conductive heat flows to and between pipes in a composite cylinder , 1987 .

[2]  Bernd Möller,et al.  Heat Roadmap Europe: Combining district heating with heat savings to decarbonise the EU energy system , 2014 .

[3]  Svend Svendsen,et al.  The status of 4th generation district heating: Research and results , 2018, Energy.

[4]  Alo Mikola,et al.  The new dimensioning method of the district heating network , 2014 .

[5]  Johan Claesson,et al.  Second-Order Multipole Formulas for Thermal Resistance of Single U-tube Borehole Heat Exchangers , 2017 .

[6]  U. Persson,et al.  Heat distribution and the future competitiveness of district heating , 2011 .

[7]  P. Wallentén Steady-state heat loss from insulated pipes , 1991 .

[8]  Patrick Lauenburg,et al.  Prosumers in district heating networks – A Swedish case study , 2016 .

[9]  Svend Svendsen,et al.  Method for optimal design of pipes for low-energy district heating, with focus on heat losses , 2011 .

[10]  Sven Werner,et al.  International review of district heating and cooling , 2017 .

[11]  Benny Bøhm,et al.  Single, twin and triple buried heating pipes: on potential savings in heat losses and costs , 2005 .

[12]  S. Werner,et al.  Novel low temperature heat distribution technology , 2018 .

[13]  Brian Vad Mathiesen,et al.  4th Generation District Heating (4GDH) Integrating smart thermal grids into future sustainable energy systems , 2014 .

[14]  G. Hellström,et al.  Multipole method to calculate borehole thermal resistances in a borehole heat exchanger , 2011, HVAC&R Research.

[15]  Mei Gong,et al.  Exergy analysis of network temperature levels in Swedish and Danish district heating systems , 2015 .

[16]  Patrick Lauenburg,et al.  Smart district heating networks – A simulation study of prosumers’ impact on technical parameters in distribution networks , 2014 .