The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: a taxonomy.

A number of trends, pressures and policy shifts can be identified that are promoting greater patient involvement in health care delivery through consultations, treatments and continuing care. However, while the literature is growing fast on different methods of involvement, little attention has been given so far to the role which patients themselves wish to play, nor even of the conceptual meanings behind involvement or participation. This article reviews the current models of involvement in health care delivery as derived from studies of professional views of current and potential practice, prior to examining the empirical evidence from a large-scale qualitative study of the views and preferences of citizens, as patients, members of voluntary groups, or neither. Individual domiciliary interviews were carried out with 44 people recruited from GP practices in northern England. These respondents were then included in a second phase of 34 focus groups in 6 different localities in northern and southern England, of which 22 were with individuals unaffiliated to any voluntary/community groups, 6 related to local voluntary/community groups with specific interests in health or health care, and 6 related to groups without such specific interests. A final set of 12 workshops with the same samples helped to confirm emergent themes. The qualitative data enabled a taxonomy of patient-desired involvement to be derived, which is contrasted with professional-determined levels of involvement identified from the literature. Participation is seen as being co-determined by patients and professionals, and occurring only through the reciprocal relationships of dialogue and shared decision-making. Not everyone wanted to be involved and the extent to which involvement was desired depended on the contexts of type and seriousness of illness, various personal characteristics and patients' relationships with professionals. These levels are seen to provide basic building blocks for a more sophisticated understanding of involvement within and between these contexts for use by professionals, managers, policy-makers and researchers.

[1]  C. Charles,et al.  Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[2]  Sherry R. Amstein “A Ladder of Citizen Participation” , 1969 .

[3]  C. Lupton,et al.  Managing Public Involvement in Health Care Purchasing , 1998 .

[4]  Pat Pridmore,et al.  Partners in Planning : Information, Participation and Empowerment , 2001 .

[5]  E. Guadagnoli,et al.  Patient participation in decision-making. , 1998, Social science & medicine.

[6]  D. Hunter A structural perspective on health care reform , 2004, Journal of health services research & policy.

[7]  J. Wennberg,et al.  Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: implications for academic medical centres , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  Renée A. Irvin,et al.  Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the effort? , 2004 .

[9]  M. Sullivan,et al.  The new subjective medicine: taking the patient's point of view on health care and health. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[10]  D Glenister,et al.  Patient participation in psychiatric services: a literature review and proposal for a research strategy. , 1994, Journal of advanced nursing.

[11]  E. Emanuel,et al.  Preserving community in health care. , 1997, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[12]  H Roberts,et al.  Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity , 1994 .

[13]  G. Grant,et al.  Defining 'people-centredness': making the implicit explicit. , 1998, Health & social care in the community.

[14]  Elizabeth Kent,et al.  The Autonomous Patient – Ending Paternalism in Medical CareThe Autonomous Patient – Ending Paternalism in Medical Care Paternalism Medical Care Angela Coulter The Nuffield Trust 121pp £5.99 +£3 pp 0 11 703056 2 0117030562 , 2003 .

[15]  G. Albrecht,et al.  The Handbook of Social Studies in Health and Medicine , 2003 .

[16]  D. White Consumer and Community Participation: A Reassessment of Process, Impact, and Value , 2000 .

[17]  A. Peräkylä,et al.  Conversation Analysis and the Professional Stocks of Interactional Knowledge , 2003 .

[18]  A Coulter,et al.  Partnerships with Patients: The Pros and Cons of Shared Clinical Decision-Making , 1997, Journal of health services research & policy.

[19]  Kate Lorig,et al.  Patients as partners in managing chronic disease , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  C. Warwick The new NHS: modern dependable , 1998 .

[21]  Gunther Eysenbach,et al.  Towards ethical guidelines for dealing with unsolicited patient emails and giving teleadvice in the absence of a pre-existing patient-physician relationship — systematic review and expert survey , 2000, Journal of medical Internet research.

[22]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[23]  P. Hoggett Agency, Rationality and Social Policy , 2001, Journal of Social Policy.

[24]  Albert O. Hirschman,et al.  Exit, Voice, and Loyalty , 1970 .

[25]  P. Mullen,et al.  Priority Setting and the Public , 1999 .

[26]  N. Britten,et al.  "Fire away": the opening sequence in general practice consultations. , 2003, Family practice.

[27]  I. Haslock Working for patients. , 1989, British journal of rheumatology.

[28]  Fedelma Winkler,et al.  Consumerism in Health Care: beyond the supermarket model , 1987 .

[29]  C. Hogg Patients, Power and Politics: From Patients to Citizens , 1999 .

[30]  A. Coulter The Autonomous Patient - Ending Paternalism in Medical Care The Autonomous Patient - Ending Paternalism in Medical Care Paternalism Medical Care Angela Coulter The Nuffield Trust 121pp £5.99 +£3 pp 0 11 703056 2 0117030562. , 2002, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[31]  Zoë Lawrence,et al.  Building on the best – choice, responsiveness and equity in the NHS , 2004, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[32]  D. Morgan Focus groups for qualitative research. , 1988, Hospital guest relations report.

[33]  O. Groene,et al.  Health promotion in hospitals: Evidence and quality Management , 2005 .

[34]  M. Spence,et al.  The Patient's Charter. , 1996, British journal of hospital medicine.

[35]  M. Kelly,et al.  Is patient involvement possible when decisions involve scarce resources? A qualitative study of decision-making in primary care. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[36]  J Gabbay,et al.  Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. , 2004, Health technology assessment.

[37]  M. Barnes,et al.  Care, communities, and citizens , 1997 .

[38]  T. Szasz,et al.  A contribution to the philosophy of medicine; the basic models of the doctor-patient relationship. , 1956, A.M.A. archives of internal medicine.

[39]  P Kinnersley,et al.  Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. , 2000, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[40]  J. Mcewen,et al.  Participation in Health , 1983 .

[41]  C. Charles,et al.  Lay participation in health care decision making: a conceptual framework. , 1993, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[42]  D. Silverman Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction , 1994 .

[43]  G. Teasdale Learning from Bristol: report of the public inquiry into children's heart surgery at Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-1995 , 2002, British journal of neurosurgery.

[44]  B. Rodgers Concepts, analysis and the development of nursing knowledge: the evolutionary cycle. , 1989, Journal of advanced nursing.

[45]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  A first class service , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[46]  J. Cahill,et al.  Patient participation: a concept analysis. , 1996, Journal of advanced nursing.