Text and Text analysis

This article focuses on ‘text,’ which is defined here as a monological stretch of written discourse that shows coherence. The basic characteristics of ‘texthood’ – that is, the referential and relational coherence of its constituent parts – are discussed. Then, ‘text analysis’ is defined as the systematic dissection of a textual unity in its constituent parts and the study of those parts in relation to each other. The instrument of text analysis can be used with various research goals – whether understanding the linguistic, cognitive, computational, or evaluative nature of a text. We provide an overview of several leading linguistic methods of text analysis. Text analyses of natural language texts have a crucial role to play in text linguistics and discourse studies, because the development of theoretical models of discourse phenomena needs to proceed in interaction with the study of the (sometimes very complex) reality of natural language in use. Finally, we discuss issues for further research, pointing toward innovative text analytic research: that of corpora of natural texts, but also of multimodal documents.

[1]  R. Wilensky.  Story grammars versus story points , 1983, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[2]  Eduard H. Hovy.  Parsimonious and Profligate Approaches to the Question of Discourse Structure Relations , 1990, INLG.

[3]  Ted Sanders,et al.  The Role of Coherence Relations and Their Linguistic Markers in Text Processing , 2000 .

[4]  Ted Sanders,et al.  PISA—A procedure for analyzing the structure of explanatory texts , 1996 .

[5]  William C. Mann,et al.  Relational propositions in discourse , 1986 .

[6]  Wilbert Spooren,et al.  Text representation as an interface between language and its users , 2001 .

[7]  S. Garrod,et al.  Resolving sentences in a discourse context: How discourse representation affects language understanding. , 1994 .

[8]  Tuija Virtanen,et al.  Issues of text typology: Narrative — a ‘basic’ type of text? , 1992 .

[9]  Ted Sanders,et al.  Text Structure as a Window on the Cognition of Writing : How text Analysis Provides Insights in Writing Products and Writing Processes , 2006 .

[10]  Ellen F. Prince,et al.  Toward a taxonomy of given-new information , 1981 .

[11]  Leo G. M. Noordman,et al.  Coherence relations in a cognitive theory of discourse representation , 1993 .

[12]  P. Thorndyke.  Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  Leo G. M. Noordman,et al.  Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations , 1992 .

[14]  William C. Mann,et al.  Rhetorical structure theory and text analysis , 1989 .

[15]  W. Chafe.  Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view , 1976 .

[16]  T. Sanders,et al.  Identifying Writing Strategies Through Text Analysis , 1999 .

[17]  Mira Ariel.  Accessibility theory: An overview , 2001 .

[18]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  An Introduction to Cognitive Grammar , 1986, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  John A. Bateman,et al.  Describing and critiquing multimodal documents , 2002 .

[20]  H. Maat.  Classifying negative coherence relations on the basis of linguistic evidence , 1998 .

[21]  Leonoor E. Oversteegen,et al.  On the pragmatic nature of causal and contrastive connectives , 1997 .

[22]  Ted Sanders,et al.  Subjectivity in causal connectives: An empirical study of language in use* , 2002 .

[23]  R. Jackendoff.  Conceptual semantics and cognitive linguistics , 1996 .

[24]  Keith K. Millis,et al.  The Influence of Connectives on Sentence Comprehension , 1994 .

[25]  T. Sanders.  Semantic and pragmatic sources of coherence: On the categorization of coherence relations in context , 1997 .

[26]  A. Knott,et al.  Using Linguistic Phenomena to Motivate a Set of Coherence Relations. , 1994 .

[27]  Alex Lascarides,et al.  Temporal interpretation, discourse relations and commonsense entailment , 1993, The Language of Time - A Reader.

[28]  Mira Ariel.  Referring and accessibility , 1988, Journal of Linguistics.

[29]  William C. Mann,et al.  Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization , 1988 .

[30]  G. Redeker.  Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse structure , 1990 .

[31]  Jerry R. Hobbs.  Coherence and Coreference , 1979, Cogn. Sci..

[32]  Leo G. M. Noordman,et al.  The different functions of a conjunction in constructing a representation of the discourse , 1997 .