Sensor-based demand-controlled ventilation: a review

With sensor-based demand-controlled ventilation (SBDCV), the rate of ventilation is modulated over time based on the signals from indoor air pollutant or occupancy sensors. SBDCV offers two potential advantages: better control of indoor pollutant concentrations, and lower energy use and peak energy demand. Based on theoretical considerations and on a review of literature, SBDCV has the highest potential to be cost-effective in applications with the following characteristics: (a) a single or small number of pollutants dominate so that ventilation sufficient to control the concentration of the dominant pollutants provides effective control of all other pollutants; (b) large buildings or rooms with unpredictable temporally variable occupancy or pollutant emission; and (c) climates with high heating or cooling loads or locations with expensive energy. At present, most SBDCV systems are based on monitoring and control of carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations. There is a limited number of well-documented case studies that quantify the energy savings and the cost-effectiveness of SBDCV. The case studies reviewed suggest that in appropriate applications, SBDCV produces significant energy savings with a payback period typically of a few years.

[1]  P. Haghighat,et al.  Iaq and energy‐management by demand controlled ventilation , 1992 .

[2]  William J. Fisk,et al.  Sensor-based demand controlled ventilation , 1997 .

[3]  William J. Fisk Indoor air quality control techniques : radon, formaldehyde, combustion products , 1987 .

[4]  A. K. Persily,et al.  Ventilation measurements in large office buildings , 1985 .

[5]  Edward Arens,et al.  Indoor humidity and human health: part II--buildings and their systems , 1996 .

[6]  David Faulkner,et al.  Air exchange effectiveness of conventional and task ventilation for offices , 1991 .

[7]  W. A. Beckman,et al.  Demand-Controlled Ventilation in a Multi-Zone Office Building , 1994 .

[8]  J. Eto,et al.  The HVAC costs of increased fresh air ventilation rates in office buildings , 1988 .

[9]  L. Mølhave,et al.  Human reactions to low concentrations of volatile organic compounds , 1986 .

[10]  S. F. Smith Thermal storage HVAC system retrofit provides economical air conditioning , 1993 .

[11]  Marilyn A. Brown,et al.  ASHRAE Standard 62-1989: Energy, Cost, and Program Implications. , 1990 .

[12]  Edward Arens,et al.  Indoor humidity and human health. Part 1: Literature review of health effects of humidity-influenced indoor pollutants , 1996 .

[13]  J. Ten Brinke,et al.  Development of new VOC exposure metrics and their relationship to ``Sick Building Syndrome`` symptoms , 1995 .

[14]  Lars Mølhave,et al.  Sensory And Physiological Effects On Humans Of Combined Exposures To Air Temperatures And Volatile Organic Compounds , 1993 .

[15]  A Persily,et al.  The Relation of CO 2 Concentration to Office Building Ventilation , 1990 .

[16]  M. Zamboni,et al.  Demand-Controlled Ventilation – an Application to Auditoria , 1992 .

[17]  P. Collet,et al.  Demand Controlled Ventilating Systems - State of the Art Review , 1990 .

[18]  William W. Nazaroff,et al.  Critique of the Use of Deposition Velocity in Modeling Indoor Air Quality , 1993 .

[19]  Refrigerating ASHRAE handbook of fundamentals , 1967 .