Mars and Venus at Twilight: A Critical Investigation of Moralism, Age Effects, and Sex Differences

Analysts have long sought to understand whether women and men have different ethical orientations. Some researchers have argued that women and men consistently make fundamentally different ethical judgments, especially of corruption; others have found no such disparities. This study considered whether an individual’s age may also play a role in determining his or her moral judgment. A statistical investigation of interactive effects between gender and age in a nationally representative data set from Japan shows that this interaction functions better as a predictor of moralism than does education or gender alone. Older individuals of both sexes were found to have similar strict moral perceptions; as women and men age, their ethical judgments converge.

[1]  Bert Klandermans,et al.  Identity Processes in Collective Action Participation: Farmers' Identity and Farmers' Protest in the Netherlands and Spain , 2002 .

[2]  Hiroshi Hirano.  Political Participation and Forms of Social Capital , 2002 .

[3]  C. Gilligan.  In a Different Voice. Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA (Harvard University Press) 1982. , 1982 .

[4]  Betsy Speicher.  Family Patterns of Moral Judgment during Adolescence and Early Adulthood. , 1994 .

[5]  J. Carpendale,et al.  Gender and Perspective Differences in Moral Judgement and Moral Orientation , 1994 .

[6]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  The Comparative Study of Political Elites , 1976 .

[7]  M. Marini,et al.  Gender and values , 1995 .

[8]  Mary C. Brinton,et al.  The Japanese Woman: Traditional Image and Changing Reality. , 1994 .

[9]  Kristina E. Thalhammer.  I'll Take the High Road: Two Pathways to Altruistic Political Mobilization Against Regime Repression in Argentina , 2001 .

[10]  M. Watts,et al.  Are Nativists a Different Kind of Democrat? Democratic Values and "Outsiders" in Japan , 2001 .

[11]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[12]  S. Verba,et al.  The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, An Analytic Study , 1964 .

[13]  Blema S. Steinberg.  The Making of Female Presidents and Prime Ministers: The Impact of Birth Order, Sex, of Siblings, and Father-Daughter Dynamics , 2001 .

[14]  J. Gray.  Men are from Mars, women are from Venus : the classic guide to understanding the opposite sex , 1992 .

[15]  Daniel Bar-Tal,et al.  Why does fear override hope in societies engulfed by intractable conflict, as it does in the Israeli society? , 2001 .

[16]  S. Pharr.  “Moralism” and the Gender Gap: Judgments of Political Ethics in Japan , 1998 .

[17]  S. Kpundeh.  Politics and Corruption in Africa: A Case Study of Sierra Leone , 1994 .

[18]  Jason Wittenberg,et al.  Making the Most Of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation , 2000 .

[19]  Donley T. Studlar,et al.  Gender, Postmaterialism, and Feminism in Comparative Perspective , 2000 .

[20]  N. Lyons.  Two Perspectives: On Self, Relationships, and Morality. , 1983 .

[21]  Ronald Inglehart,et al.  The Renaissance of Political Culture , 1988, American Political Science Review.

[22]  Nancy J. Chodorow,et al.  The Reproduction of Mothering , 1999 .

[23]  C. Gilligan.  In a different voice: Women's conceptions of self and of morality. , 1977 .

[24]  Nancy Burns,et al.  Gender and Citizen Participation: Is There a Different Voice? , 1995 .

[25]  Carol Gilligan,et al.  Mapping the moral domain : a contribution of women's thinking to psychological theory and education , 1988 .

[26]  T. Skocpol.  Protecting Soldiers And Mothers , 1992 .

[27]  L. Blum.  Moral Perception and Particularity: Gilligan and Kohlberg: implications for moral theory , 1988 .

[28]  J. Newman,et al.  Sex As a Political Variable: Women As Candidates and Voters in U.S. Elections , 1997 .

[29]  D. Krebs,et al.  Gender and Dilemma Differences in Real-Life Moral Judgment. , 1996 .

[30]  L. Kohlberg.  Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization , 1969 .

[31]  How Different Is the "Different Voice"? , 1986, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[32]  Tsunoda Katsuya.  Difference in the Formation of Attitude Toward Nuclear Power , 2002 .

[33]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[34]  C. Gilligan.  Adolescent development reconsidered. , 1987, New directions for child development.

[35]  J. Gardiner.  The Politics of Corruption: Organized Crime in an American City , 1971 .

[36]  S. Pharr.  EIGHT. Officials' Misconduct and Public Distrust: Japan and the Trilateral Democracies , 2000 .

[37]  N. Chodorow.  Family Structure and Feminine Personality , 1994 .

[38]  M. J. Larrabee.  An Ethic of Care : Feminist and Interdisciplinary Perspectives , 1996 .

[39]  Lawrence J. Walker,et al.  Sex Differences in the Development of Moral Reasoning: A Critical Review. , 1984 .

[40]  L D Cohn,et al.  Sex differences in the course of personality development: a meta-analysis. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  Kathleen S. Uno.  Bicycle Citizens: The Political World of the Japanese Housewife , 1999 .

[42]  P. Muhlberger.  Moral Reasoning Effects on Political Participation , 2000 .

[43]  R. Inglehart.  Post-Materialism in an Environment of Insecurity , 1981, American Political Science Review.

[44]  L. Huddy,et al.  Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates , 1993 .

[45]  N. Nie,et al.  Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-Nation Comparison , 1978 .