Who Owns the Contour of a Visual Hole?

Holes are useful in the study of shape, contour curvature, and border ownership. Several authors have suggested that holes have figural or quasi-figural status. I discuss three criteria to test the evidence that holes behave more like figures than like ground: (i) holes perceived as such; (ii) similar performance for holes and figures; (iii) different performance for holes and other ground regions. Using these criteria, I review the literature and conclude that holes do not have figural status in relation to border ownership. I also argue that holes are ideal stimuli to study figure - ground organisation.

[1]  Jacob Feldman,et al.  Visual comparisons within and between object parts: evidence for a single-part superiority effect , 2003, Vision Research.

[2]  Svetha Venkatesh,et al.  Dynamic Threshold Determination by Local and Global Edge Evaluation , 1995, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[3]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Salience of visual parts , 1997, Cognition.

[4]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Coding of Border Ownership in Monkey Visual Cortex , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Detection of change in shape and its relation to part structure. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[6]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.

[7]  Victor A. F. Lamme.  The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  M. Peterson.  Object Recognition Processes Can and Do Operate Before Figure–Ground Organization , 1994 .

[9]  Jacob Feldman,et al.  Detection of change in shape: an advantage for concavities , 2003, Cognition.

[10]  S E Palmer,et al.  Of Holes and Wholes: The Perception of Surrounded Regions , 2001, Perception.

[11]  M. K. Albert.  Cue interactions, border ownership and illusory contours , 2001, Vision Research.

[12]  Hsing-Kuo Kenneth Pao,et al.  A Continuous Shape Descriptor by Orientation Diffusion , 2001, EMMCVPR.

[13]  W. Gerbino,et al.  Contour curvature polarity and surface interpolation , 2005, Vision Research.

[14]  J. Feldman,et al.  Information along contours and object boundaries. , 2005, Psychological review.

[15]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Early Computation of Contour Curvature and Part Structure: Evidence from Holes , 2004, Perception.

[16]  Whitman Richards,et al.  Attentional frames, frame curves and figural boundaries: The inside/outside dilemma , 1996, Vision Research.

[17]  S. Palmer.  Vision Science : Photons to Phenomenology , 1999 .

[18]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Solid shape , 1990 .

[19]  B. Gibson.  Visual attention and objects: one versus two or convex versus concave? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Manfredo Massironi,et al.  The Psychology of Graphic Images: Seeing, Drawing, Communicating , 2001 .

[21]  M. Bertamini,et al.  The Importance of Being Convex: An Advantage for Convexity when Judging Position , 2001, Perception.

[22]  Yaoda Xu,et al.  Early computation of part structure: Evidence from visual search , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  Paul L. Rosin.  Shape Partitioning by Convexity , 1999, BMVC.

[24]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Contextual Modulation in Primary Visual Cortex , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Codon constraints on closed 2D shapes , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[26]  M Kubovy,et al.  Detection of symmetry and perceptual organization: the way a lock-and-key process works. , 1997, Acta psychologica.

[27]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  The shape of holes , 2003, Cognition.

[28]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Differences between searching among objects and searching among holes , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  James Elder,et al.  A measure of closure , 1994, Vision Research.

[30]  T. Shipley,et al.  PART-BASED REPRESENTATIONS OF VISUAL SHAPE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR VISUAL COGNITION , 2002 .

[31]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Part-Based Representations of Visual Shape and Implications for Visual Cognition , 2001 .

[32]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Visual surface representation: a critical link between lower-level and higher level vision , 1995 .

[33]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Contour-based object identification and segmentation: Stimuli, norms and data, and software tools , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[34]  Rüdiger von der Heydt,et al.  Image Parsing Mechanisms of the Visual Cortex , 2002 .

[35]  Walter Gerbino,et al.  Convexity and Symmetry in Figure-Ground Organization , 1976 .

[36]  K. Koffka.  Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[37]  Achille C. Varzi,et al.  Holes and Other Superficialities , 1994 .

[38]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Masking Interrupts Figure-Ground Signals in V1 , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.