Visual saliency and potential field data enhancements: Where is your attention drawn?

Interpretation of gravity and magnetic data for exploration applications may be based on pattern recognition in which geophysical signatures of geologic features associated with localized characteristics are sought within data. A crucial control on what comprises noticeable and comparable characteristics in a data set is how images displaying those data are enhanced. Interpreters are provided with various image enhancement and display tools to assist their interpretation, although the effectiveness of these tools to improve geologic feature detection is difficult to measure. We addressed this challenge by analyzing how image enhancement methods impact the interpreter’s visual attention when interpreting the data because features that are more salient to the human visual system are more likely to be noticed. We used geologic target-spotting exercises within images generated from magnetic data to assess commonly used magnetic data visualization methods for their visual saliency. Our aim was achieved in two stages. In the first stage, we identified a suitable saliency detection algorithm that can computationally predict visual attention of magnetic data interpreters. The computer vision community has developed various image saliency detection algorithms, and we assessed which algorithm best matches the interpreter’s data observation patterns for magnetic target-spotting exercises. In the second stage, we applied this saliency detection algorithm to understand potential visual biases for commonly used magnetic data enhancement methods. We developed a guide to choosing image enhancement methods, based on saliency maps that minimize unintended visual biases in magnetic data interpretation, and some recommendations for identifying exploration targets in different types of magnetic data.

[1]  Laurent Itti,et al.  A Bayesian model for efficient visual search and recognition , 2010, Vision Research.

[2]  T. Menneer,et al.  Are we properly using our brains in seismic interpretation , 2006 .

[3]  N. Mackworth,et al.  Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Sabine Süsstrunk,et al.  Salient Region Detection and Segmentation , 2008, ICVS.

[5]  S Ullman,et al.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[6]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[7]  Walter R. Roest,et al.  Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal , 1992 .

[8]  Frédo Durand,et al.  An Inverted Saliency Model for Display Enhancement , .

[9]  Roberto Togneri,et al.  Identifying effective interpretation methods for magnetic data by profiling and analyzing human data interactions , 2013 .

[10]  S. Süsstrunk,et al.  Frequency-tuned salient region detection , 2009, CVPR 2009.

[11]  Christof Koch,et al.  Attentional Selection for Object Recognition - A Gentle Way , 2002, Biologically Motivated Computer Vision.

[12]  Tele Tan,et al.  Quantitative study of geological target spotting with the use of eye tracking , 2010, EGIHMI '10.

[13]  Laurent Itti,et al.  Ieee Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1 Rapid Biologically-inspired Scene Classification Using Features Shared with Visual Attention , 2022 .

[14]  Gregory Gutin,et al.  Digraphs - theory, algorithms and applications , 2002 .

[15]  PIERRE VAN DE LAAR,et al.  Task-Dependent Learning of Attention , 1997, Neural Networks.

[16]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[17]  Martin D. Levine,et al.  Visual Saliency Based on Scale-Space Analysis in the Frequency Domain , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[18]  Sabine Süsstrunk,et al.  Saliency detection using maximum symmetric surround , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[19]  Eileen Kowler Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[20]  Michael A. Hamilton,et al.  Geologic and Structural Setting of Gold Mineralization in the Kirkland Lake-Larder Lake Gold Belt, Ontario , 2008 .

[21]  R. Whitty Digraphs: theory, algorithms and applications. By Jørgen Bang‐Jensen and Gregory Gutin. Published by Springer‐Verlag, London, U.K., Springer Monographs in Mathematics Series, 2000. ISBN: 1‐85233‐268‐9, 776 pages. Price: U.K. ?59.00, Germany DM 199.90, hard cover. , 2002 .

[22]  Peter Kovesi,et al.  Automatic identification of responses from porphyry intrusive systems within magnetic data using image analysis , 2011 .

[23]  P. Milligan,et al.  Interpreting aeromagnetic data in areas of limited outcrop: an example from the Arunta Block, Northern Territory , 1995 .

[24]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs , 1999 .

[25]  Shiliang Sun,et al.  A Visual Attention Based Approach to Text Extraction , 2010, 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[26]  Roberto Togneri,et al.  Analysing Variability in Geophysical Data Interpretation by Monitoring Eye Gaze Movement , 2012 .

[27]  Vijay Singh,et al.  Potential field tilt—a new concept for location of potential field sources , 1994 .

[28]  Bernhard P. Wrobel,et al.  Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision , 2001 .

[29]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Graph-Based Visual Saliency , 2006, NIPS.

[30]  Christof Koch,et al.  A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis , 2009 .

[31]  R. Blakely Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications , 1996 .

[32]  T. Hoschke Geophysical Signatures of Copper-Gold Porphyry and Epithermal Gold Deposits, and Implications for Exploration , 2011 .

[33]  Le Yu,et al.  Towards the automatic selection of optimal seam line locations when merging optical remote-sensing images , 2012 .