Evaluation of Chlorophyll-Related Vegetation Indices Using Simulated Sentinel-2 Data for Estimation of Crop Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation

In recent years, the impact of chlorophyll content on the estimation of the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FPAR) has attracted increased attention. In this study, chlorophyll-related vegetation indices (VIs) were selected and tested for their capability in crop FPAR estimation using simulated Sentinel-2 data. These indices can be categorized into four classes: 1) the ratio indices; 2) the normalized difference indices; 3) the triangular area-based indices; and 4) the integrated indices. Two crops, wheat and corn, with distinctive canopy and leaf structure were studied. Measured FPAR and Sentinel-2 reflectance simulated from field spectral measurements were used. The results showed that VIs using the nearinfrared and red-edge reflectance, including the modified Simple Ratio-2 (mSR2), the red-edge Simple Ratio (SR705), the RedEdge Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (ND705), MERIS Terrestrial Chlorophyll Index (MTCI), and the Revised Optimized Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (OSAVI[705, 750]), had a strong linear correlation with FPAR, especially in the high biomass range. When the red-edge reflectance was used, the ratio indices (e.g., mSR2 and SR705) had a stronger correlation with crop FPAR than the normalized difference indices (e.g., ND705). Sensitivity analysis showed that mSR2 had the strongest linear correlation with FPAR of the two crops across a growing season. Further analysis indicated that indices using the red-edge reflectance might be useful for developing FPAR retrieval algorithms that are independent of crop types. This suggests the potential for high resolution and high-quality mapping of FPAR for precision farming using the Sentinel-2 data.

[1]  A. Viña,et al.  New developments in the remote estimation of the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation in crops , 2005 .

[2]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Use of a green channel in remote sensing of global vegetation from EOS- MODIS , 1996 .

[3]  A. Viña,et al.  Remote estimation of canopy chlorophyll content in crops , 2005 .

[4]  N. Gobron,et al.  On the need to observe vegetation canopies in the near-infrared to estimate visible light absorption , 2009 .

[5]  Andrew E. Suyker,et al.  REMOTE ESTIMATION OF GROSS PRIMARY PRODUCTION IN MAIZE , 2011 .

[6]  Craig S. T. Daughtry,et al.  A visible band index for remote sensing leaf chlorophyll content at the canopy scale , 2013, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[7]  Aleixandre Verger,et al.  Optimal modalities for radiative transfer-neural network estimation of canopy biophysical characteristics: Evaluation over an agricultural area with CHRIS/PROBA observations , 2011 .

[8]  Andrew E. Suyker,et al.  Estimation of crop gross primary production (GPP): II. Do scaled MODIS vegetation indices improve performance? , 2015 .

[9]  D. Sims,et al.  Relationships between leaf pigment content and spectral reflectance across a wide range of species, leaf structures and developmental stages , 2002 .

[10]  Jadunandan Dash,et al.  A new approach for estimating northern peatland gross primary productivity using a satellite‐sensor‐derived chlorophyll index , 2011 .

[11]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Quantitative estimation of chlorophyll-a using reflectance spectra : experiments with autumn chestnut and maple leaves , 1994 .

[12]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Relationships between gross primary production, green LAI, and canopy chlorophyll content in maize: Implications for remote sensing of primary production , 2014 .

[13]  N. H. Brogea,et al.  Comparing prediction power and stability of broadband and hyperspectral vegetation indices for estimation of green leaf area index and canopy chlorophyll density , 2022 .

[14]  Anatoly A. Gitelson,et al.  Relationship between fraction of radiation absorbed by photosynthesizing maize and soybean canopies and NDVI from remotely sensed data taken at close range and from MODIS 250 m resolution data , 2014 .

[15]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Three‐band model for noninvasive estimation of chlorophyll, carotenoids, and anthocyanin contents in higher plant leaves , 2006 .

[16]  T. Nauss,et al.  Model parameterization to simulate and compare the PAR absorption potential of two competing plant species , 2009, International journal of biometeorology.

[17]  A. Viña,et al.  Green leaf area index estimation in maize and soybean: Combining vegetation indices to achieve maximal sensitivity , 2012 .

[18]  吴炳方 Wu Bingfang,et al.  overview on methods of deriving fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FPAR) using remote sensing , 2012 .

[19]  Moon S. Kim,et al.  Estimating Corn Leaf Chlorophyll Concentration from Leaf and Canopy Reflectance , 2000 .

[20]  C. Daughtry,et al.  Remote Sensing Leaf Chlorophyll Content Using a Visible Band Index , 2011 .

[21]  S. Goetz,et al.  Satellite remote sensing of surface energy balance : success, failures, and unresolved issues in FIFE , 1992 .

[22]  J. Chen.  Evaluation of Vegetation Indices and a Modified Simple Ratio for Boreal Applications , 1996 .

[23]  Hermann Kaufmann,et al.  End-to-end sensor simulation for spectral band selection and optimization with application to the Sentinel-2 mission. , 2012, Applied optics.

[24]  Jin Chen,et al.  A simple method for reconstructing a high-quality NDVI time-series data set based on the Savitzky-Golay filter , 2004 .

[25]  Yujie Wang,et al.  Impacts of light use efficiency and fPAR parameterization on gross primary production modeling , 2014 .

[26]  Aleixandre Verger,et al.  ntercomparison and quality assessment of MERIS , MODIS and SEVIRI FAPAR roducts over the Iberian Peninsula , 2012 .

[27]  J. Dash,et al.  The MERIS terrestrial chlorophyll index , 2004 .

[28]  蒙继华,et al.  基于遥感的光合有效辐射吸收比率(FPAR) 估算方法综述 , 2012 .

[29]  S. Nilsson,et al.  Comparison of four global FAPAR datasets over Northern Eurasia for the year 2000 , 2010 .

[30]  Anatoly A. Gitelson,et al.  Remote estimation of nitrogen and chlorophyll contents in maize at leaf and canopy levels , 2013, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[31]  O. Hagolle,et al.  LAI, fAPAR and fCover CYCLOPES global products derived from VEGETATION: Part 1: Principles of the algorithm , 2007 .

[32]  Luis Alonso,et al.  Evaluation of Sentinel-2 Red-Edge Bands for Empirical Estimation of Green LAI and Chlorophyll Content , 2011, Sensors.

[33]  Elizabeth M. Middleton,et al.  Variations of Foliage Chlorophyll fAPAR and Foliage Non-Chlorophyll fAPAR (fAPAR$_{\rm chl}$, fAPAR$_{\rm non\mathchar "702D chl}$) at the Harvard Forest , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[34]  Shanyu Huang,et al.  Non-destructive estimation of rice plant nitrogen status with Crop Circle multispectral active canopy sensor , 2013 .

[35]  Jadunandan Dash,et al.  An algorithm to derive the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by photosynthetic elements of the canopy (FAPAR(ps)) from eddy covariance flux tower data. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[36]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  Using hyperspectral vegetation indices to estimate the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by corn canopies , 2013 .

[37]  Nadine Gobron,et al.  Monitoring FAPAR over land surfaces with remote sensing data , 2004, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[38]  Gail Taylor,et al.  Validating the MERIS Terrestrial Chlorophyll Index (MTCI) with ground chlorophyll content data at MERIS spatial resolution , 2010 .

[39]  John R. Miller,et al.  Estimating crop stresses, aboveground dry biomass and yield of corn using multi-temporal optical data combined with a radiation use efficiency model , 2010 .

[40]  D. Diner,et al.  Estimation of vegetation canopy leaf area index and fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation from atmosphere‐corrected MISR data , 1998 .

[41]  Jadunandan Dash,et al.  Evaluation of the influence of two operational fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FAPAR) products on terrestrial ecosystem productivity modelling , 2014 .

[42]  Anatoly A. Gitelson,et al.  Remote estimation of gross primary productivity in soybean and maize based on total crop chlorophyll content , 2012 .

[43]  F. Baret,et al.  Neural network estimation of LAI, fAPAR, fCover and LAI×Cab, from top of canopy MERIS reflectance data : Principles and validation , 2006 .

[44]  F. Baret,et al.  GEOV1: LAI, FAPAR essential climate variables and FCOVER global time series capitalizing over existing products. Part 2: Validation and intercomparison with reference products , 2013 .

[45]  Chaoyang Wu,et al.  Estimating chlorophyll content from hyperspectral vegetation indices : Modeling and validation , 2008 .

[46]  M. Claverie,et al.  Maize and sunflower biomass estimation in southwest France using high spatial and temporal resolution remote sensing data , 2012 .

[47]  A. Gitelson,et al.  The need for a common basis for defining light-use efficiency: Implications for productivity estimation , 2015 .

[48]  A. Huete,et al.  Dependence of NDVI and SAVI on sun/sensor geometry and its effect on fAPAR relationships in Alfalfa , 1995 .

[49]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .

[50]  Gregory P. Asner,et al.  SCALE DEPENDENCE OF ABSORPTION OF PHOTOSYNTHETICALLY ACTIVE RADIATION IN TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS , 1998 .

[51]  F. Baret,et al.  Estimating light absorption by chlorophyll, leaf and canopy in a deciduous broadleaf forest using MODIS data and a radiative transfer model , 2005 .

[52]  John R. Miller,et al.  Remote Estimation of Crop Chlorophyll Content Using Spectral Indices Derived From Hyperspectral Data , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[53]  P. Zarco-Tejadaa,et al.  Hyperspectral indices and model simulation for chlorophyll estimation in open-canopy tree crops , 2004 .

[54]  R. Myneni,et al.  On the relationship between FAPAR and NDVI , 1994 .

[55]  J. Roujean,et al.  Estimating PAR absorbed by vegetation from bidirectional reflectance measurements , 1995 .

[56]  John R. Miller,et al.  Integrated narrow-band vegetation indices for prediction of crop chlorophyll content for application to precision agriculture , 2002 .

[57]  G. Rondeaux,et al.  Optimization of soil-adjusted vegetation indices , 1996 .

[58]  S. Running,et al.  Global products of vegetation leaf area and fraction absorbed PAR from year one of MODIS data , 2002 .

[59]  Yuri A. Gritz,et al.  Relationships between leaf chlorophyll content and spectral reflectance and algorithms for non-destructive chlorophyll assessment in higher plant leaves. , 2003, Journal of plant physiology.

[60]  A. Viña,et al.  Comparison of different vegetation indices for the remote assessment of green leaf area index of crops , 2011 .

[61]  S. Goward,et al.  Vegetation canopy PAR absorptance and NDVI: An assessment for ten tree species with the SAIL model , 1997 .

[62]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Estimating green LAI in four crops: Potential of determining optimal spectral bands for a universal algorithm , 2014 .

[63]  Jing M. Chen,et al.  Canopy architecture and remote sensing of the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by boreal conifer forests , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[64]  T. A. Black,et al.  Can a satellite-derived estimate of the fraction of PAR absorbed by chlorophyll (FAPARchl) improve predictions of light-use efficiency and ecosystem photosynthesis for a boreal aspen forest? , 2009 .

[65]  Bingfang Wu,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of retrieving fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FPAR) using remote sensing data , 2016 .