Time thieves and space invaders: technology, work and the organization

Purpose – This paper aims to investigate the shifting boundaries between two experiential categories – home and work – for office workers. The boundaries are both spatial and temporal, and the paper seeks to analyse how certain kinds of mobile technology are being used in such a way as to make these boundaries increasingly permeable.Design/methodology/approach – The research involved both the collection of quantitative data using a survey tool, and the gathering of qualitative data through in‐depth interviews.Findings – The paper finds that the mobile technology discussed enables work extension – the ability to work outside the office, outside “normal” office hours. This provides flexibility with respect to the timing and location of work, and makes it easier to accommodate both work and family. But at the same time, of course, it also increases expectations: managers and colleagues alike expect staff to be almost always available to do work, which makes it easier for work to encroach on family time, and ...

[1]  David Knights,et al.  Subjectivity, Power and the Labour Process , 1990 .

[2]  J. Louviere,et al.  Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities , 1994 .

[3]  Daniel R. Williams,et al.  Defining acceptable conditions in wilderness , 1993 .

[4]  Geoff Cooper,et al.  The mutable mobile: social theory in the wireless world , 2001 .

[5]  T. F. Weaver,et al.  Estimating Willingness to Pay and Resource Tradeoffs with Different Payment Mechanisms: An Evaluation of a Funding Guarantee for Watershed Management , 1999 .

[6]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Analyzing Decision Making: Metric Conjoint Analysis , 1988 .

[7]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation , 1996 .

[8]  Barbara Steward.  Changing Times , 2000 .

[9]  R. Manning,et al.  Evaluating multiple dimensions of visitors' tradeoffs between access and crowding at Arches National Park using indifference curve analysis , 2001 .

[10]  John Hassard,et al.  Images of Time in Work and Organization , 2000 .

[11]  R. Manning,et al.  Solitude Versus Access: A Study of Tradeoffs in Outdoor Recreation Using Indifference Curve Analysis , 2001 .

[12]  Thomas Hylland Eriksen,et al.  Tyranny Of The Moment , 2001 .

[13]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses , 1984 .

[14]  Francine Schlosser.  So, How Do People Really Use Their Handheld Devices? An Interactive Study of Wireless Technology Use , 2002 .

[15]  David L. Collinson,et al.  Identities and Insecurities: Selves at Work , 2003 .

[16]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Discovery and Integration of Mobile Communications in Everyday Life , 2001, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[17]  J. Lewis,et al.  The Structures and Meanings of Social Time , 1981 .

[18]  Leslie B. Hammer,et al.  The Unbalanced Life: Work and Family Conflict , 2002 .

[19]  P. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook , 1978 .

[20]  A. Venkatesh,et al.  An emerging distributed work arrangement: an investigation of computer-based supplemental work at home , 1992 .

[21]  Richard J. Butler,et al.  Time in organizations: Its Experience, . Explanations and Effects , 1995 .

[22]  D. Harvey,et al.  The Condition of Postmodernity , 2020, The New Social Theory Reader.

[23]  Bo Shelby,et al.  User standards for ecological impacts at wilderness campsites. , 1988 .

[24]  Christopher A. Higgins,et al.  Work-life Conflict in Canada in the New Millennium - a Status Report , 2003 .

[25]  J. Hearn,et al.  European Perspectives on Men and Masculinities: National and Transnational Approaches , 2006 .

[26]  Wolfgang Haider,et al.  A model of tourist choices of hypothetical Caribbean destinations , 1990 .

[27]  Eviatar Zerubavel,et al.  Private-time and Public-time , 1990 .

[28]  Conjoint Analysis of Angler Evaluations of Atlantic Salmon Restoration on the Penobscot River, Maine , 1996 .

[29]  Robert E. Manning,et al.  Social carrying capacity of natural areas: theory and application in the U.S. National Parks , 1996 .

[30]  John Hassard,et al.  The Sociology of time , 1990 .

[31]  Georg Strom,et al.  Mobile Devices as Props in Daily Role Playing , 2002, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[32]  G. Bultena,et al.  Freedom versus control: A study of backpackers’ preferences for wilderness management , 1981 .

[33]  Christopher A. Higgins,et al.  After-Hours Telecommuting and Work-Family Conflict: A Comparative Analysis , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  T. F. Weaver,et al.  Evaluating Impacts from Noxious Facilities: Including Public Preferences in Current Siting Mechanisms , 1993 .

[35]  Gaurav Sharma,et al.  Changing times. , 1963, Radiology.

[36]  Analyzing public inputs to multiple objective decisions on national forests using conjoint analysis , 1998 .

[37]  John Mackenzie,et al.  A Comparison of Contingent Preference Models , 1993 .

[38]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Place as a Practical Concern of Mobile Workers , 2003 .

[39]  R. Alec Mackenzie,et al.  The Time Trap , 1972 .

[40]  David Pitt,et al.  Crowding norms at frontcountry sites: A visual approach to setting standards of quality , 1996 .

[41]  Graeme Salaman,et al.  THE CULT[URE] OF THE CUSTOMER , 1992 .

[42]  H. Timmermans,et al.  Stated preference and choice models applied to recreation research : a review , 1990 .

[43]  Susanne Tietze,et al.  The times and temporalities of home‐based telework , 2003 .

[44]  Francis A. Wilson,et al.  Surveillance and the reengineering of commitment within the virtual organization , 1996, SIGCPR '96.

[45]  T. F. Weaver,et al.  Heterogeneous Preferences and Aggregation in Environmental Policy Analysis: A Landfill Siting Case , 1994 .

[46]  Robert Hassan,et al.  Network Time and the New Knowledge Epoch , 2003 .

[47]  Leslie Haddon,et al.  Communications on the move: the experience of mobile telephony in the 1990s , 1997 .

[48]  Jeffrey R. Edwards,et al.  Mechanisms Linking Work and Family: Clarifying the Relationship Between Work and Family Constructs , 2000 .

[49]  E. Seiden.  On the Problem of Construction of Orthogonal Arrays , 1954 .

[50]  Susanne Tietze,et al.  Feelin' groovy♪: appropriating time in home‐based telework , 2004 .

[51]  Daniel R. Williams,et al.  The effect of norm-encounter compatibility on crowding perceptions, experience and behavior in river recreation settings. , 1991 .

[52]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Using Hierarchical Information Integration to Model Consumer Responses to Possible Planning Actions: Recreation Destination Choice Illustration , 1990 .

[53]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[54]  Rosalind C. Barnett,et al.  Toward a review and reconceptualization of the work/family literature. , 1998 .

[55]  Robert E. Manning,et al.  Crowding Norms: Alternative Measurement Approaches , 1999 .

[56]  J. Louviere,et al.  Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation , 1998 .

[57]  Cleve E. Willis,et al.  Comparison of contingent valuation and conjoint analysis in ecosystem management , 2000 .

[58]  David Lamond,et al.  Teleworking: Frameworks for Organizational Research , 2001 .

[59]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Blurring the boundaries: cell phones, mobility, and the line between work and personal life , 2001 .

[60]  J. Grzywacz,et al.  Demography , 1986, Prehistoric Fisherfolk of Oman: The Neolithic Village of Ras Al-Hamra RH-5.

[61]  Bridgette Wessels,et al.  In the company of strangers: user perceptions of the mobile phone , 1997 .