Understanding compression: Modeling the effects of dynamic-range compression in hearing aids
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D D Dirks,et al. Subjective judgements of clarity and intelligibility for filtered stimuli with equivalent speech intelligibility index predictions. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[2] James M. Kates,et al. A Time-Frequency Modulation Model of Speech Quality , 2007, 2007 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics.
[3] E W Yund,et al. The Effect of Multichannel Compression on Vowel and Stop‐Consonant Discrimination in Normal‐Hearing and Hearing‐Impaired Subjects , 1995, Ear and hearing.
[4] B C Moore. Use of a Loudness Model for Hearing Aid Fitting. IV. Fitting Hearing Aids with Multi-Channel Compression so as to Restore ‘Normal’ Loudness for Speech at Different Levels , 2000, British journal of audiology.
[5] H Levitt,et al. The effect of compression ratio and release time on the categorical rating of sound quality. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] E W Yund,et al. Enhanced speech perception at low signal-to-noise ratios with multichannel compression hearing aids. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] Graham Naylor,et al. Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings – 1. Patterns of benefit , 2006, International journal of audiology.
[8] H. Dillon,et al. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid , 1986, Ear and hearing.
[9] M. Uschold,et al. Methods and applications , 1953 .
[10] Gitte Keidser,et al. The preferred response slopes and two-channel compression ratios in twenty listening conditions by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners and their relationship to the acoustic input , 2005, International journal of audiology.
[11] R. Lippmann,et al. Study of multichannel amplitude compression and linear amplification for persons with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] David Fabry,et al. Speech and music quality ratings for linear and nonlinear hearing aid circuitry. , 2007, Journal of american academy of audiology.
[13] R. Fay,et al. Compression: From Cochlea to Cochlear Implants , 2013, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research.
[14] C W Turner,et al. Quantifying the contribution of audibility to recognition of compression-amplified speech. , 1999, Ear and hearing.
[15] Michael Nilsson,et al. Development of a test environment to evaluate performance of modern hearing aid features. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[16] Lorienne M Jenstad,et al. Using Multichannel Wide-Dynamic Range Compression in Severely Hearing-Impaired Listeners: Effects on Speech Recognition and Quality , 2005, Ear and hearing.
[17] James M Kates,et al. Effects of Noise, Nonlinear Processing, and Linear Filtering on Perceived Speech Quality , 2010, Ear and hearing.
[18] B C Moore,et al. A comparison of behind-the-ear high-fidelity linear hearing aids and two-channel compression aids, in the laboratory and in everyday life. , 1983, British journal of audiology.
[19] James M. Kates,et al. The Hearing-Aid Speech Quality Index (HASQI) , 2010 .
[20] G Keidser,et al. The Preferred Number of Channels (One, Two, or Four) in NAL-NL1 Prescribed Wide Dynamic Range Compression (WDRC) Devices , 2001, Ear and hearing.
[21] M C Martin,et al. Is AGC beneficial in hearing aids? , 1984, British journal of audiology.
[22] Sheila Moodie,et al. The Desired Sensation Level Multistage Input/Output Algorithm , 2005, Trends in amplification.
[23] Braida Ld,et al. Multiband compression limiting for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1987 .
[24] H Dillon. Tutorial Compression? Yes, But for Low or High Frequencies, for Low or High Intensities, and with What Response Times? , 1996, Ear and hearing.
[25] G Keidser,et al. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[26] Yi Hu,et al. Objective measures for predicting speech intelligibility in noisy conditions based on new band-importance functions. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[27] E W Yund,et al. Multichannel compression hearing aids: effect of number of channels on speech discrimination in noise. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[28] G. Carter,et al. Estimation of the magnitude-squared coherence function via overlapped fast Fourier transform processing , 1973 .
[29] Martin Hansen. Effects of Multi-Channel Compression Time Constants on Subjectively Perceived Sound Quality and Speech Intelligibility , 2002, Ear and hearing.
[30] T Houtgast,et al. Compression and expansion of the temporal envelope: evaluation of speech intelligibility and sound quality. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] James M. Kates,et al. A speech quality metric based on a cochlear model. , 2009 .
[32] S. Soli,et al. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] J. Kates. Principles of Digital Dynamic-Range Compression , 2005, Trends in amplification.
[34] Lorienne M Jenstad,et al. Quantifying the effect of compression hearing aid release time on speech acoustics and intelligibility. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[35] Karen A Doherty,et al. Subjective and objective effects of fast and slow compression on the perception of reverberant speech in listeners with hearing loss. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[36] D J Van Tasell,et al. Quantifying the relation between speech quality and speech intelligibility. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[37] C Elberling. Loudness scaling revisited. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[38] Pamela E Souza,et al. Effects of Compression on Speech Acoustics, Intelligibility, and Sound Quality , 2002, Trends in amplification.
[39] Teresa Y C Ching,et al. Methods and Applications of the Audibility Index in Hearing Aid Selection and Fitting , 2002, Trends in amplification.
[40] H Levitt,et al. Preferred Listening Levels for Linear and Slow‐Acting Compression Hearing Aids , 1995, Ear and hearing.
[41] James M Kates,et al. Coherence and the speech intelligibility index. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[42] H Levitt,et al. Effect of release time in compression hearing aids: paired-comparison judgments of quality. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[43] Julius O. Smith,et al. Bark and ERB bilinear transforms , 1999, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..
[44] B C Moore,et al. Comparison of different forms of compression using wearable digital hearing aids. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[45] Yund Ew,et al. The effect of multichannel compression on vowel and stop-consonant discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. , 1995 .
[46] C M Reed,et al. Hearing aids--a review of past research on linear amplification, amplitude compression, and frequency lowering. , 1979, ASHA monographs.
[47] L D Braida,et al. Multiband compression limiting for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1987, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[48] J M Kates,et al. On using coherence to measure distortion in hearing aids. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[49] R Plomp,et al. The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[50] James M. Kates,et al. Multichannel Dynamic-Range Compression Using Digital Frequency Warping , 2005, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..
[51] E Villchur,et al. Signal processing to improve speech intelligibility in perceptive deafness. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[52] Carolyn R. Bertozzi,et al. Methods and Applications , 2009 .