Can eLearning Promote Higher-order Learning Without Tutor Overload?

While numerous claims have been made for the pedagogical benefits of eLearning, these claims are rarely subjected to rigorous empirical evaluation. Moreover, there are indications that eLearning is more expensive to deliver than conventional distance teaching. One component of this extra cost arises from the greater time input required of teachers/tutors in eLearning environments. This article evaluates a number of online pedagogical techniques which offer the potential to enhance student learning of higher-order cognitive skills while limiting demands on tutor time. The online techniques tested were resources/debates and peer-tutoring. Evaluation of the learning of higher-order skills was carried out through analysis of students' contributions to a series of online discussions. This evaluation suggests that, given the appropriate pedagogical design, students can develop effective ways of conducting online discussions which display evidence of engaging in higher-order learning. In addition, the online pedagogical techniques did not appear to make excessive demands on tutor time. However, further work is required before a more definitive statement can be made about the potential of eLearning to enhance higher-order learning with reasonable levels of tutor input. The conclusions of the article will include an outline of the directions of this further work.

[1]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[2]  L. J. Friedman.  Child Development , 1971, Nature.

[3]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  Paradigm shifts and instructional technology : An introduction , 1996 .

[4]  Harvey Mellar,et al.  A methodology for the analysis of patterns of participation within computer mediated communication courses , 1996 .

[5]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course , 2000 .

[6]  P. Dillenbourg.  What do you mean by collaborative learning , 1999 .

[7]  Terence C. Ahern,et al.  The Effects of Teacher Discourse in Computer-Mediated Discussion , 1992 .

[8]  A. Biglan.  The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. , 1973 .

[9]  Stellan Ohlsson,et al.  Learning to do and learning to understand : a lesson and a challenge for cognitive modeling , 1996 .

[10]  Christopher R. Jones,et al.  Taking without consent: stolen knowledge and the place of abstractions and assessment in situated learning , 1999, CSCL.

[11]  John M. Braxton.  Disciplines with an Affinity for the Improvement of Undergraduate Education. , 1995 .

[12]  Anthony Kaye,et al.  Learning Together Apart , 1992 .

[13]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Computers in the Classroom: Mindtools for Critical Thinking , 1995 .

[14]  Paul Bacsich,et al.  The costs of networked learning , 2001 .

[15]  Bertram C. Bruce.  Computers and the collaborative experience of learning , 1995 .

[16]  R. Neumann.  Disciplinary Differences and University Teaching , 2001 .