Communities , knowledge creation , and information diffusion

In this paper, we examine how patterns of scientific collaboration contribute to knowledge creation and diffusion. Recent studies have shown that scientists can benefit from their position within collaborative networks by being able to receive more information of better quality in a timely fashion, and by presiding over communication between collaborators. Here we focus on the tendency of scientists to cluster into tightly knit communities, and discuss the implications of this tendency for scientific production. We begin by reviewing a new method for finding communities, and we then assess its benefits in terms of computation time and accuracy. While communities often serve as a taxonomic scheme to map knowledge domains, they also affect the way scientists engage in the creation of new knowledge. By drawing on the longstanding debate on the relative benefits of social cohesion and brokerage, we discuss the conditions that facilitate collaborations among scientists within or across communities. We show that highly cited scientific production occurs within communities, when scientists have cohesive collaborations with others from the same knowledge domain, and across communities, when scientists intermediate among otherwise disconnected collaborators from different knowledge domains. We also discuss the implications of communities for information diffusion, and show how traditional epidemiological approaches need to be refined to take knowledge heterogeneity into account and preserve the system’s ability to promote creative processes of novel recombinations of

[1]  E. Garfield,et al.  Citation indexes for science. , 1956, Science.

[2]  WILLIAM GOFFMAN,et al.  Generalization of Epidemic Theory: An Application to the Transmission of Ideas , 1964, Nature.

[3]  D J PRICE,et al.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. , 1965, Science.

[4]  WILLIAM GOFFMAN,et al.  Mathematical Approach to the Spread of Scientific Ideas—the History of Mast Cell Research , 1966, Nature.

[5]  E. Garfield Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. , 1972, Science.

[6]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[8]  M. Tushman Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. , 1977 .

[9]  Mark S. Granovetter Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  R. J. Field,et al.  Oscillations and Traveling Waves in Chemical Systems , 1985 .

[11]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  Daniel J. Brass Creativity: It's all in Your Social Network , 1995 .

[13]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[14]  Bart Selman,et al.  Referral Web: combining social networks and collaborative filtering , 1997, CACM.

[15]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[16]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[17]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Theories of Citation , 1998 .

[18]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[19]  T. Valente,et al.  Accelerating the Diffusion of Innovations Using Opinion Leaders , 1999 .

[20]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[21]  A. Edmondson Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[22]  Robert D. Tollison,et al.  Intellectual Collaboration , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[23]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Power-Law Distribution of the World Wide Web , 2000, Science.

[24]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[25]  R. May,et al.  Infection dynamics on scale-free networks. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[27]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  T. Snijders The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics , 2001 .

[29]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  Talk of the Network: A Complex Systems Look at the Underlying Process of Word-of-Mouth , 2001 .

[30]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Duncan J Watts,et al.  A simple model of global cascades on random networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Visualizing knowledge domains , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[33]  J. Moody The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999 , 2004 .

[34]  Y. Moreno,et al.  Disease spreading in structured scale-free networks , 2002, cond-mat/0210362.

[35]  W. Powell,et al.  Networks and Economic life , 2003 .

[36]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[37]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[38]  Darrell Laham,et al.  From paragraph to graph: Latent semantic analysis for information visualization , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  M E J Newman,et al.  Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[40]  Simon Rodan,et al.  More than Network Structure: How Knowledge Heterogeneity Influences Managerial Performance and Innovativeness , 2004 .

[41]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in very large networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[42]  R. Guimerà,et al.  Modularity from fluctuations in random graphs and complex networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[43]  M E J Newman,et al.  Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[44]  Peter Sheridan Dodds,et al.  Universal behavior in a generalized model of contagion. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[45]  Stefan Bornholdt,et al.  Detecting fuzzy community structures in complex networks with a Potts model. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[46]  David Obstfeld Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation , 2005 .

[47]  Werner Ebeling,et al.  The application of evolution models in scientometrics , 2005, Scientometrics.

[48]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Mapping the backbone of science , 2004, Scientometrics.

[49]  S. Redner Citation statistics from 110 years of physical review , 2005, physics/0506056.

[50]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Affect and Creativity at Work , 2005 .

[51]  S. Havlin,et al.  Self-similarity of complex networks , 2005, Nature.

[52]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[53]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance , 2005, Science.

[54]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society , 2005, Nature.

[55]  Leon Danon,et al.  Comparing community structure identification , 2005, cond-mat/0505245.

[56]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[57]  M E J Newman,et al.  Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  Alex Arenas,et al.  Synchronization reveals topological scales in complex networks. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[59]  J. Perry-Smith Social Yet Creative: The Role Of Social Relationships In Facilitating Individual Creativity , 2006 .

[60]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  The power of a good idea: Quantitative modeling of the spread of ideas from epidemiological models , 2005, physics/0502067.

[61]  E. Garfield Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. 1955. , 1955, International journal of epidemiology.

[62]  Sergei Maslov,et al.  Finding scientific gems with Google's PageRank algorithm , 2006, J. Informetrics.

[63]  Spain,et al.  Cascade Dynamics of Complex Propagation , 2005, physics/0504165.

[64]  F. Schweitzer,et al.  Modeling Evolving Innovation Networks , 2007, 0712.2779.

[65]  J. Kleinberg Algorithmic Game Theory: Cascading Behavior in Networks: Algorithmic and Economic Issues , 2007 .

[66]  R. Lambiotte,et al.  Majority model on a network with communities. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[67]  Erin E Leahey,et al.  Not by Productivity Alone: How Visibility and Specialization Contribute to Academic Earnings , 2007 .

[68]  R. Guimerà,et al.  Classes of complex networks defined by role-to-role connectivity profiles. , 2007, Nature physics.

[69]  Christina Fang,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation: The Influence of Organizational Structure on Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[70]  Renaud Lambiotte,et al.  Unanimity rule on networks. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[71]  L. Fleming,et al.  Collaborative Brokerage, Generative Creativity, and Creative Success , 2007 .

[72]  Wei Huang,et al.  Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks with community structure , 2007 .

[73]  Ken Wakita,et al.  Finding community structure in mega-scale social networks: [extended abstract] , 2007, WWW '07.

[74]  M. Macy,et al.  Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[75]  Marcel Ausloos,et al.  Self-citations, co-authorships and keywords: A new approach to scientists’ field mobility? , 2007, Scientometrics.

[76]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Extracting the hierarchical organization of complex systems , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[77]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Quantifying social group evolution , 2007, Nature.

[78]  Alex Arenas,et al.  Analysis of the structure of complex networks at different resolution levels , 2007, physics/0703218.

[79]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[80]  Angel Sánchez,et al.  Mesoscopic Structure Conditions the Emergence of Cooperation on Social Networks , 2006, PloS one.

[81]  Maxi San Miguel,et al.  Generic absorbing transition in coevolution dynamics. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[82]  Martin Rosvall,et al.  Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[83]  R Lambiotte,et al.  Role of second trials in cascades of information over networks. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[84]  Luís M. A. Bettencourt,et al.  Scientific discovery and topological transitions in collaboration networks , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[85]  Yue Chen,et al.  Towards an explanatory and computational theory of scientific discovery , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[86]  Claudio Castellano,et al.  Community Structure in Graphs , 2007, Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science.

[87]  Joon-Oh Park,et al.  The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2011 .

[88]  J. Müller,et al.  Group Theory , 2019, Computers, Rigidity, and Moduli.