Accelerating New Product Development: A Preliminary Empirical Test of a Hierarchy of Implementation

Abstract Although time to market and a product's profitability are closely linked, simply speeding up new product development (NPD) is no guarantee of success. In fact, haphazardly adopting the numerous methods for accelerating NPD may jeopardize the potential success of the new product and the company. An article in a previous issue of The Journal of Product Innovation Management suggests that companies seeking to speed up their NPD process should take a hierarchical approach to implementing the various acceleration techniques. To improve the likelihood that efforts to accelerate NPD will pay off with shorter development time, greater market share, and improved profitability, it is recommended that a company start by focusing on simplification of the NPD process. From there, the company can proceed in sequence through techniques involving the elimination of unnecessary steps in the NPD process, parallel processing (i.e., performing two or more NPD steps at the same time), the elimination of delays, and speeding up of the NPD process. Ed J. Nijssen, Arthur R. L. Arbouw, and Harry R. Commandeur follow up on this earlier work by addressing several key questions regarding the proposed hierarchy of techniques for accelerating NPD. First, do companies that make extensive use of the proposed hierarchy develop new products faster than companies that do not? Second, do companies that make extensive use of the hierarchy enjoy better financial performance than those that do not? Third, regardless of the hierarchy, are products developed faster by companies that make more intensive use of acceleration methods than by companies that use fewer methods of acceleration? Finally, how does financial performance compare among companies that make more intensive use of acceleration methods without following the hierarchy and those that use fewer methods of acceleration? A survey of Dutch companies finds that the proposed hierarchy of techniques has a positive effect on NPD speed. The survey results also suggest that faster NPD is possible through the use of the various acceleration methods without regard for the order in which they are implemented. However, a strong positive relationship is evident between the hierarchy and the profitability of the product and the company. In other words, a random approach to NPD acceleration does not improve financial performance. By trying to accelerate NPD in accordance with the proposed hierarchy of methods, a company can avoid critical mistakes that might otherwise limit financial results.

[1]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Project NewProd: Factors in New Product Success , 1980 .

[2]  C. Merle Crawford,et al.  New Products Management , 1983 .

[3]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit , 1984 .

[4]  G. M. Steinberg Comparing technological risks in large scale national projects , 1985 .

[5]  R. Cooper,et al.  0 0 0 0 An Investigation into the New Product Process : Steps , Deficiencies , and Impact , 1986 .

[6]  Raymond G. Ernst HOW TO STREAMLINE OPERATIONS , 1987 .

[7]  R. Cooper,et al.  Success factors in product innovation , 1987 .

[8]  N. Capon,et al.  Marketing and Technology: A Strategic Coalignment , 1987 .

[9]  Robert G. Batson Critical path acceleration and simulation in aircraft technology planning , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[10]  Milton D. Rosenau,et al.  From experience: Faster new product development , 1988 .

[11]  J. L. Bower,et al.  Fast-Cycle Capability for Competitive Power , 1988 .

[12]  M. Rosenau Faster New Product Development , 1988 .

[13]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  First‐mover advantages , 1988 .

[14]  George S. Day,et al.  Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority , 1988 .

[15]  John C. Narver,et al.  The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability , 1990 .

[16]  H. Thamhain Managing technologically innovative team efforts toward new product success , 1990 .

[17]  I. Nonaka Redundant, Overlapping Organization: A Japanese Approach to Managing the Innovation Process , 1990 .

[18]  D. Wilemon,et al.  Accelerating the Development of Technology-Based New Products , 1990 .

[19]  T. Hout,et al.  Competing Against Time , 1990 .

[20]  T. M. Nevens,et al.  Commercializing technology: What the best companies do , 1990 .

[21]  P. Ranganath Nayak,et al.  Planning Speeds Technological Development , 1990 .

[22]  R. Cordero Managing for speed to avoid product obsolescence: A survey of techniques , 1991 .

[23]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Product development performance : strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry / Kim B. Clark, Tahahiro Fujimoto , 1991 .

[24]  C. Crawford The Hidden Costs of Accelerated Product Development , 1992 .

[25]  R. Ray Gehani,et al.  Concurrent product development for fast-track corporations , 1992 .

[26]  Joseph T. Vesey Time-to-market: Put speed in product development , 1992 .

[27]  S. Hart,et al.  Where to Now in New Product Development Research , 1992 .

[28]  R. Rothwell Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s , 1992 .

[29]  K. Clark,et al.  Organizing and Leading “Heavyweight” Development Teams , 1992 .

[30]  Ursula Weisenfeld,et al.  Making Trade‐Offs in the New Product Development Process: A German/US Comparison , 1992 .

[31]  D. Wilemon,et al.  A Survey of Major Approaches for Accelerating New Product Development , 1992 .

[32]  A. Griffin,et al.  An Interim Report on Measuring Product Development Success and Failure , 1993 .

[33]  A. Griffin Measuring product development time to improve the development process , 1993 .

[34]  Preston G. Smith,et al.  Developing products in half the time , 1995 .