The Unexpected Effects of a Sexual Harassment Educational Program

This study evaluated a sexual harassment program for staff and faculty employees at a metropolitan university. One hundred men and 97 women who participated in the program and 141 men and 178 women who did not participate responded to a self-report questionnaire through campus mail. Analysis of variance was used to test for effects of program participation and employee gender on five outcome variables. Results indicated that participants showed more knowledge about sexual harassment than did nonparticipants and had a stronger attitude that sexual behavior at work is inappropriate. Men had more favorable attitudes toward sexual behavior at work than did women. Moreover, program participation and employee gender interacted, indicating an adverse reaction to the program among male participants. Male participants were less likely than other groups to perceive coercive sexual harassment, less willing to report sexual harassment, and more likely to blame the victim. Implications of the findings are discussed.

[1]  J. Lam,et al.  The Impact of a University Policy on the Sexual Harassment of Female Students , 1992 .

[2]  L. Brooks,et al.  Reporting Sexual Harassment: Exploring a Predictive Model , 1991 .

[3]  John C. Jessell,et al.  The effects of educational intervention on perceptions of sexual harassment , 1996 .

[4]  Breaking the Silence: Creating User-Friendly Sexual Harassment Policies , 1997 .

[5]  R. Sitgreaves.  Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[6]  Edwin M. Bartee,et al.  Organizational Development: Theory, Practice, and Research , 1979 .

[7]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[8]  B. Latané,et al.  The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't He Help? , 1972 .

[9]  Peter H. Rossi,et al.  The Multi-Goal, Theory-Driven Approach to Evaluation: A Model Linking Basic and Applied Social Science , 1980 .

[10]  Michele Antoinette Paludi,et al.  Ivory Power: Sexual Harassment on Campus. , 1991 .

[11]  Mark L. Lengnick-Hall,et al.  SEXUAL HARASSMENT RESEARCH: A METHODOLOGICAL CRITIQUE , 1995 .

[12]  R. Clair.  The use of framing devices to sequester organizational narratives: Hegemony and harassment , 1993 .

[13]  Susan Faludi,et al.  Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women , 1991 .

[14]  Warren G. Bennis,et al.  Planning for change , 2018, Healthcare Architecture as Infrastructure.

[15]  Eleanor H. Blakely,et al.  The relationship between gender, personal experience, and perceptions of sexual harassment in the workplace , 1995 .

[16]  William O'Donohue,et al.  Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment. , 1997 .

[17]  M. Paludi,et al.  Academic and Workplace Sexual Harassment: A Resource Manual , 1991 .

[18]  Catharine A. MacKinnon,et al.  Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law , 1987 .

[19]  G. Latham.  Human Resource Training and Development , 1988 .

[20]  R. J. Summers.  Determinants of judgments of and responses to a complaint of sexual harassment , 1991 .

[21]  Rosedith Sitgreaves Bowker.  Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences , 1983 .

[22]  Philip Bobko,et al.  Correlation and Regression: Principles and Applications for Industrial/Organizational Psychology and Management , 1995 .

[23]  Marcie A. Cavanaugh,et al.  Using Surveys to Assess the Prevalence of Sexual Harassment: Some Methodological Problems , 1995 .

[24]  Robert H. Faley,et al.  Determinants of Target Responses to Sexual Harassment: A Conceptual Framework , 1997 .

[25]  The development of a sexual harassment proclivity scale: Construct validation and relationship to communication competence , 1996 .

[26]  D. Kilpatrick,et al.  Effects of sexual harassment. , 1997 .

[27]  B. Gutek,et al.  The Empirical Basis for the Reasonable Woman Standard , 1995 .

[28]  J. Brehm,et al.  Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control , 1981 .

[29]  J. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. , 1975 .

[30]  L. Fitzgerald,et al.  The dimensions of sexual harassment: A structural analysis , 1989 .

[31]  Lizabeth A. Barclay,et al.  Preventing Sexual Harassment: The Effect of Multiple Training Methods , 1997 .

[32]  Freda Kemp.  Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 2003 .

[33]  A. Barak.  A Cognitive‐Behavioral Educational Workshop to Combat Sexual Harassment in the Workplace , 1994 .

[34]  B. Roscoe.  Sexual Harassment: An Educational Program for Middle School Students. , 1994 .

[35]  B. Gutek.  How Subjective Is Sexual Harassment? An Examination of Rater Effects , 1995 .

[36]  Robert Rosenthal,et al.  Contemporary Issues in the Analysis of Data: A Survey of 551 Psychologists , 1993 .

[37]  G. Burrell,et al.  Sexuality of organization , 1989 .

[38]  R. Moyer,et al.  Some Effects of Brief Training Interventions on Perceptions of Sexual Harassment1 , 1998 .

[39]  J. Gruber,et al.  A typology of personal and environmental sexual harassment: Research and policy implications for the 1990s , 1992 .

[40]  B. Gutek.  Sexual harassment policy initiatives. , 1997 .

[41]  John B. Pryor,et al.  A typology of sexual harassment: Characteristics of harassers and the social circumstances under which sexual harassment occurs. , 1997 .

[42]  Deborah L. Edwards,et al.  How To Stop Sexual Harassment in Our Schools: A Handbook and Curriculum Guide for Administrators and Teachers. , 1994 .

[43]  Barbara A. Gutek,et al.  Attributions and Assignment of Responsibility in Sexual Harassment , 1982 .

[44]  M. Smith,et al.  Training in Organizations , 1991 .

[45]  L. Fitzgerald,et al.  Sexual Harassment: A Research Analysis and Agenda for the 1990s , 1993 .

[46]  B. Korth,et al.  Dependency and fault as determinants of helping , 1978 .

[47]  Kathleen Beauvais.  Workshops to Combat Sexual Harassment: A Case Study of Changing Attitudes , 1986, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[48]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[49]  Daniel A. Thomann.  An Organizational Development Approach to Preventing Sexual Harassment: Developing Shared Commitment through Awareness Training. , 1989 .

[50]  J. Chapman,et al.  The Victimization Of Women , 1978 .

[51]  Neville R. Robertson,et al.  The Development and Evaluation of a Sexual Harassment Contact Person Training Package , 1993, Behavior modification.

[52]  Carol T. Kulik,et al.  Individual Differences in the Effectiveness of Sexual Harassment Awareness Training1 , 1998 .

[53]  James C. McElroy,et al.  Sexual Harassment Behaviors and Work Related Perceptions and Attitudes , 1994 .

[54]  Huey-tsyh Chen.  Theory-driven evaluations , 1990 .

[55]  Office Romances: The New Battleground Over Employees' Rights to Privacy and the Employers' Right to Intervene , 1997 .

[56]  John P. Campbell,et al.  Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences. , 1983 .

[57]  William R. Shadish,et al.  Evaluation studies : review annual , 1976 .

[58]  S. Riger.  Gender Dilemmas in Sexual Harassment Policies and Procedures. , 1991 .

[59]  P. Frazier,et al.  Social Science Research on Lay Definitions of Sexual Harassment , 1995 .

[60]  L. Fitzgerald,et al.  But was it really sexual harassment?: Legal, behavioral, and psychological definitions of the workplace victimization of women. , 1997 .

[61]  Stewart L. Tubbs,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Communication. , 1988 .

[62]  H. Kelley.  Attribution theory in social psychology , 1967 .

[63]  Leonard Bickman.  The Evaluation of Prevention Programs , 1983 .