Multi-Project Strategy and Market-Share Growth: The Benefits of Rapid Design Transfer in New Product Development

This paper explores the impact on sales growth of different product development strategies, especially an approach that focuses on the coordination of multiple projects that overlap in time and share critical components. The data for our analysis comes from the automobile industry, although the principles we discuss should apply to any industry where firms compete with multiple product lines and where the sharing of components among more than one distinct product is both possible and desirable. Some firms compete by trying to develop ‘hit’ products in isolation, with little or no reuse of components or coordination with other products. Another way to compete is to leverage a firm’s investment in new technologies across as many new products as possible as quickly as possible, while the technologies are still relatively new. This paper proposes a typology that captures this effect by categorizing product development strategies into four types: new design, rapid (or concurrent) design transfer, sequential design transfer, and design modification. An analysis of 210 projects from the automobile industry between 1980 and 1991 indicates that firms utilizing the rapid design transfer strategy—quickly leveraging new platform components across multiple projects–increased sales more than when they or their competitors did not use this strategy. The study’s results suggest that not only the sharing of technology among multiple projects but also the speed of technology leveraging are important to sales growth. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Michael Burda,et al.  Revolutionizing product development , 1993 .

[2]  Edward F. McDonough,et al.  Speeding Up New Product Development: The Effects of Leadership Style and Source of Technology , 1991 .

[3]  T. Hout,et al.  Competing Against Time , 1990 .

[4]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[5]  S. Kotha Mass customization: Implementing the emerging paradigm for competitive advantage , 1995 .

[6]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[7]  Bengt Klefsjö,et al.  The machine that changed the world , 2008 .

[8]  J. L. Bower,et al.  Fast-Cycle Capability for Competitive Power , 1988 .

[9]  Samuel Hollander,et al.  The Sources of Increased Efficiency: A Study of DuPont Rayon Plants , 1965 .

[10]  Norman P. Smothers,et al.  Patterns of japanese strategy: Strategic combinations of strategies , 1990 .

[11]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Product Development Performance in the Auto Industry: 1990s Update , 1995 .

[12]  K. Clark,et al.  Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction☆ , 1993 .

[13]  D. Teece ECONOMIES OF SCOPE AND THE SCOPE OF THE ENTERPRISE , 1980 .

[14]  Roy Rothwell,et al.  SAPPHO updated - project SAPPHO phase II , 1993 .

[15]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Multiproject strategy, design transfer, and project performance: a survey of automobile development projects in the US and Japan , 1995 .

[16]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Japan's Software Factories: A Challenge to U.S. Management, Michael A. Cusumano. 1991. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. 513 pages. ISBN: 0-19-506216-7 , 1991, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[17]  K. Srinivasan,et al.  Broader product line: a necessity to achieve success? , 1990 .

[18]  P. Kotler,et al.  Principles of Marketing , 1983 .

[19]  W. Mitchell,et al.  The effect of introducing important incremental innovations on market share and business survival , 1995 .

[20]  C. Crawford The Hidden Costs of Accelerated Product Development , 1992 .

[21]  R. Sanchez Strategic flexibility in product competition , 1995 .

[22]  S. Kotha Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition , 1992 .

[23]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Product development performance : strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry / Kim B. Clark, Tahahiro Fujimoto , 1991 .

[24]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[25]  Alex Miller A taxonomy of technological settings, with related strategies and performance levels , 1988 .

[26]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[27]  Wheelwright Sc,et al.  The new product development map. , 1989 .

[28]  G. Stalk,et al.  Kaisha, the Japanese Corporation. , 1987 .

[29]  J. Ettlie,et al.  Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation , 1984 .

[30]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Principles of marketing management , 1986 .

[31]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Multi-project management: strategy and organization in automobile product development , 1993 .

[32]  G. Stalk,et al.  Kaisha: The Japanese Corporation. , 1986 .

[33]  Erik Jan Hultink,et al.  4 Product development performance: strategy, organization and management in the world auto industry☆ , 1994 .

[34]  Takahiro Fujimoto Organizations for effective product development : the case of the global automobile industry , 1989 .

[35]  R. Garud,et al.  Technological and Organizational Designs for Realizing Economies of Substitution , 1997 .

[36]  R. Cordero Managing for speed to avoid product obsolescence: A survey of techniques , 1991 .

[37]  Donald G. Marquis,et al.  Successful industrial innovations : a study of factors underlying innovation in selected firms , 1969 .

[38]  W. Abernathy Innovation : Mapping the winds of creative destruction * , 2003 .

[39]  James M. Utterback,et al.  The product family and the dynamics of core capability , 1992 .

[40]  R. Cooper,et al.  The Impact of Product Innovativeness on Performance , 1991 .

[41]  T. Fujimoto,et al.  Managing the Product Line: A Case of the Automobile Industry , 1992 .

[42]  Kentaro Nobeoka,et al.  INTER-PROJECT LEARNING IN NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT. , 1995 .

[43]  M. Meyer,et al.  Product strategy and corporate success , 1991 .

[44]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  New Product Strategy in Small Technology-Based Firms: A Pilot Study , 2011 .

[45]  Gilberto Luis Camanho,et al.  Newsweek , 2015, Revista brasileira de ortopedia.

[46]  Jonathan Nook,et al.  ["A Model for New Product Development: An Empirical Test"] , 2007 .

[47]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[48]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Shifting economies: From craft production to flexible systems and software factories , 1992 .

[49]  K. Clark Project scope and project performance: the effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development , 1989 .

[50]  P. Williamson,et al.  Related diversification, core competences and corporate performance , 2007 .

[51]  W. Sasser,et al.  The new product development map. , 1989, Harvard business review.

[52]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization , 1988 .