Variables affecting silicone-polymethyl methacrylate interfacial bond strengths.

PURPOSE This study investigated the effects of various polymerization methods and of various types of silane coupling agents on the interfacial bond strengths of Molloplast-B and of two types of heat-processed polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). MATERIALS AND METHODS Standardized blocks of PMMA were processed and stored in 100% humidity for 14 days. Silicone of equal dimensions was flasked and processed with premixed and fresh-mixed silane coupling agents interposed. Processing utilized both a typical heated-water system and a dry-heat oven. Following recovery, the specimens were peel-tested at an angle of 180 degrees in an Instron machine. RESULTS There was no significant difference between the test variables of Lucitone (Dentsply/York Division, York, PA) versus Lucitone 199 (Dentsply/York Division), nor with wet versus dry heat polymerization methods. However, the mean bond strengths for premixed silane improved slightly in a wet polymerization environment. Conversely, fresh-mixed silane's mean bond strength increased slightly with dry-heat polymerization. CONCLUSIONS The bond strength between a methyl methacrylate denture base and a silicone soft liner varies only slightly when either Lucitone, Lucitone 199, or polymerization in a wet or dry environment is used. Under the conditions of this study, a fresh-mixed silane coupling agent produced a distinctly superior bond strength.

[1]  G. Graser,et al.  Porosity of denture resin cured by microwave energy. , 1991, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[2]  R E Ogle,et al.  A new visible light-cured resin system applied to removable prosthodontics. , 1986, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  P. Wright The success and failure of denture soft-lining materials in clinical use. , 1984, Journal of dentistry.

[4]  D. E. Smith,et al.  A six-year retrospective study of Molloplast-B-lined dentures. Part II: Liner serviceability. , 1983, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[5]  P. Wright Characterization of the Adhesion of Soft Lining Materials to Poly (methyl methacrylate) , 1982, Journal of dental research.

[6]  M. Braden,et al.  New soft lining materials. , 1982, Journal of dentistry.

[7]  W. Amin,et al.  The nature of the interface between polymethyl methacrylate denture base materials and soft lining materials. , 1981, Journal of dentistry.

[8]  P. Wright Composition and properties of soft lining materials for acrylic dentures. , 1981, Journal of dentistry.

[9]  A. Caputo,et al.  Effectiveness of porcelain repair systems. , 1979, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  P. Wright Soft lining materials: their status and prospects. , 1976, Journal of dentistry.

[11]  J. V. von Fraunhofer,et al.  Some physical properties of four resilient lining materials. , 1976, Journal of dentistry.

[12]  J. F. Bates,et al.  EVALUATION OF INDIRECT RESILIENT LINERS FOR DENTURES: LABORATORY AND CLINICAL TESTS. , 1965, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[13]  R. G. Craig,et al.  Properties of resilient denture liners. , 1961, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[14]  G. Barnhart Silicone Rubber as a Resilient Denture-Base Material , 1960, Journal of dental research.

[15]  R. Storer,et al.  A preliminary report on resilient denture plastics , 1958 .