Comparing Risks by Acceptance and Rejection

Stochastic dominance is a partial order on risky assets (“gambles”) that is based on the uniform preference—of all decision-makers in an appropriate class—for one gamble over another. We modify this requirement, first, by taking into account the status quo (given by the current wealth) and the possibility of rejecting gambles, and second, by comparing rejections that are substantive (i.e., uniform over wealth levels or over utilities). This yields two new stochastic orders: “wealth-uniform dominance” and “utility-uniform dominance.” Unlike stochastic dominance, these two orders are complete: any two gambles can be compared. Moreover, they are equivalent to the orders induced by, respectively, the Aumann–Serrano index of riskiness and the Foster–Hart measure of riskiness.

[1]  J. Pratt RISK AVERSION IN THE SMALL AND IN THE LARGE11This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant NSF-G24035). Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government. , 1964 .

[2]  Jack Meyer,et al.  Measuring Risk Aversion , 2006, Found. Trends Microeconomics.

[3]  L. Blume,et al.  The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edition , 2008 .

[4]  G. Whitmore,et al.  Third-Degree Stochastic Dominance , 1970 .

[5]  M. Rabin Risk Aversion and Expected Utility Theory: A Calibration Theorem , 2000 .

[6]  Sergiu Hart,et al.  An Operational Measure of Riskiness , 2009, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Increasing risk II: Its economic consequences , 1971 .

[8]  Steven A. Lippman,et al.  An Alternative Characterization of Decreasing Absolute Risk Aversion , 1983 .

[9]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[10]  Robert J. Aumann,et al.  An Economic Index of Riskiness , 2008, Journal of Political Economy.

[11]  K. Arrow,et al.  Aspects of the theory of risk-bearing , 1966 .

[12]  Amnon Schreiber An Economic Index of Relative Riskiness , 2012 .

[13]  Moti Michaeli Riskiness for sets of gambles , 2012 .

[14]  K. Arrow,et al.  The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics , 2020 .

[15]  A. Cabrales,et al.  The Appeal of Information Transactions , 2012 .

[16]  Ignacio Palacios-Huerta,et al.  Rejecting small gambles under expected utility , 2006 .

[17]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[18]  S. Hart,et al.  A wealth-requirement axiomatization of riskiness , 2013 .

[19]  LevyHaim Stochastic Dominance and Expected Utility , 1992 .

[20]  Josef Hadar,et al.  Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospects , 1969 .

[21]  Donald J. Meyer,et al.  Relative Risk Aversion: What Do We Know? , 2005 .

[22]  H. Levy,et al.  Efficiency analysis of choices involving risk , 1969 .

[23]  M. Yaari,et al.  Some remarks on measures of risk aversion and on their uses , 1969 .

[24]  H. Levy Stochastic dominance and expected utility: survey and analysis , 1992 .

[25]  S. Hart A Simple Riskiness Order Leading to the Aumann-Serrano Index of Riskiness , 2009 .

[26]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Increasing risk: I. A definition , 1970 .

[27]  K. Arrow Essays in the theory of risk-bearing , 1958 .

[28]  Preferences Scientific Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. , 1982 .

[29]  I. Meilijson On the adjustment coefficient, drawdowns and Lundberg-type bounds for random walk. , 2008, 0807.3506.