Negation detection in Swedish clinical text: An adaption of NegEx to Swedish

BackgroundMost methods for negation detection in clinical text have been developed for English text, and there is a need for evaluating the feasibility of adapting these methods to other languages. A Swedish adaption of the English rule-based negation detection system NegEx, which detects negations through the use of trigger phrases, was therefore evaluated.ResultsThe Swedish adaption of NegEx showed a precision of 75.2% and a recall of 81.9%, when evaluated on 558 manually classified sentences containing negation triggers, and a negative predictive value of 96.5% when evaluated on 342 sentences not containing negation triggers.ConclusionsThe precision was significantly lower for the Swedish adaptation than published results for the English version, but since many negated propositions were identified through a limited set of trigger phrases, it could nevertheless be concluded that the same trigger phrase approach is possible in a Swedish context, even though it needs to be further developed.AvailabilityThe triggers used for the evaluation of the Swedish adaption of NegEx are available at http://people.dsv.su.se/~mariask/resources/triggers.txt and can be used together with the original NegEx program for negation detection in Swedish clinical text.

[1]  Göran Petersson,et al.  Evaluation and implementation of e-health and health information initiatives: International perspectives , 2010, Health informatics journal.

[2]  Ian Hinchliffe,et al.  Swedish: An Essential Grammar , 1997 .

[3]  Xavier Carreras,et al.  Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning: Shared Task , 2009, CoNLL 2009.

[4]  Wendy W. Chapman,et al.  ConText: An algorithm for determining negation, experiencer, and temporal status from clinical reports , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[5]  Ilya M. Goldin,et al.  Learning to Detect Negation with ‘Not’ in Medical Texts , 2003 .

[6]  Roser Morante,et al.  A Metalearning Approach to Processing the Scope of Negation , 2009, CoNLL.

[7]  Johan Carlberger,et al.  Implementing an Efficient Part-Of-Speech Tagger , 1999, Softw. Pract. Exp..

[8]  Jules J Berman,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of a negation tagger in a pipeline-based system for information extract from pathology reports. , 2004, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[9]  Lior Rokach,et al.  Negation recognition in medical narrative reports , 2008, Information Retrieval.

[10]  Wendy W. Chapman,et al.  Evaluation of negation phrases in narrative clinical reports , 2001, AMIA.

[11]  Prakash M. Nadkarni,et al.  Research Paper: Use of General-purpose Negation Detection to Augment Concept Indexing of Medical Documents: A Quantitative Study Using the UMLS , 2001, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[12]  Wendy W. Chapman,et al.  A Simple Algorithm for Identifying Negated Findings and Diseases in Discharge Summaries , 2001, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[13]  Yang Huang,et al.  A novel hybrid approach to automated negation detection in clinical radiology reports. , 2007, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[14]  Özlem Uzuner,et al.  Machine learning and rule-based approaches to assertion classification. , 2009, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[15]  Jean-Pierre Van Noppen,et al.  Crystal . The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language , 1989 .

[16]  Maria Skeppstedt.  Negation Detection in Swedish Clinical Text , 2010, Louhi@NAACL-HLT.

[17]  H. Dalianis,et al.  The Stockholm EPR Corpus – Characteristics and Some Initial Findings , 2009 .

[18]  Sumithra Velupillai,et al.  How Certain are Clinical Assessments? Annotating Swedish Clinical Text for (Un)certainties, Speculations and Negations , 2010, LREC.

[19]  David Crystal,et al.  The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language , 2012, Modern Language Review.

[20]  Robert A. Israel,et al.  International Classification of Diseases (ICD) , 2005 .

[21]  Peter L. Elkin,et al.  A controlled trial of automated classification of negation from clinical notes , 2005, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..