Representative process sampling for reliable data analysis—a tutorial

Process sampling of moving streams of particulate matter, fluids and slurries (over time or space) or stationary one‐dimensional (1‐D) lots is often carried out according to existing tradition or protocol not taking the theory of sampling (TOS) into account. In many situations, sampling errors (sampling variances) can be reduced greatly however, and sampling biases can be eliminated completely, by respecting a simple set of rules and guidelines provided by TOS. A systematic approach for description of process heterogeneity furnishes in‐depth knowledge about the specific variability of any 1‐D lot. The variogram and its derived auxiliary functions together with a set of error generating functions provide critical information on:—process variation over time or space,—the number of extracted increments to composite into a final, optimal sample,—the frequency with which to extract increments—and which sampling scheme will be optimal (random, stratified random or systematic selection). In addition variography will delineate cyclic behaviors as well as long‐term trends thereby ensuring that future sampling will not accidentally be performed with a sampling rate coincident with the frequency of any hidden cycle, eliminating the risk of underestimating process variation. A brief description of selected hardware for extraction of samples from 1‐D lots is provided in order to illustrate the key issues to consider when installing new, or optimizing existing sampling devices and procedures. A number of practical examples illustrate the use of TOS and variography to design optimal sampling protocols for a variety of typical process situations. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Pentti Minkkinen,et al.  Comparison of some methods to estimate the limiting value of the variogram, vh(j), for the sampling interval j=0 in sampling error estimation , 1997 .

[2]  Pentti Minkkinen,et al.  Evaluation of the fundamental sampling error in the sampling of particulate solids , 1987 .

[3]  O. Miserquea,et al.  Segregation of the bulk blend fertilizers , 2004 .

[4]  Kim H. Esbensen,et al.  Representative mass reduction in sampling—a critical survey of techniques and hardware , 2004 .

[5]  Pierre M. Gy,et al.  The analytical and economic importance of correctness in sampling , 1986 .

[6]  Pierre M. Gy,et al.  Sampling of discrete materials , 2004 .

[7]  Kim H. Esbensen,et al.  ACOUSTIC CHEMOMETRICS-FROM NOISE TO INFORMATION , 1998 .

[8]  Pierre Gy,et al.  Sampling for analytical purposes , 1998 .

[9]  Kim H. Esbensen,et al.  Representative Mass Reduction A Critical Survey , 2003 .

[10]  P. M. Gy Does your mechanical sampler do what it's supposed to , 1981 .

[11]  Kim H. Esbensen,et al.  Representative Sampling for reliable data analysis: Theory Of Sampling , 2005 .

[12]  Pierre Gy,et al.  Sampling of discrete materials. III. Quantitative approach: sampling of one-dimensional objects , 2004 .

[13]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Pierre Gy's Sampling Theory and Sampling Practice , 1989 .

[14]  Pierre Gy,et al.  Unbiased sampling from a falling stream of particulate material , 1978 .

[15]  Patricia L. Smith,et al.  A primer for sampling solids, liquids, and gases : based on the seven sampling errors of Pierre Gy , 2006 .

[16]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[17]  Kim H. Esbensen,et al.  New developments in acoustic chemometric prediction of particle size distribution—‘the problem is the solution’ , 2000 .