Effects of photodynamic therapy on adhesion molecules and metastasis.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) induces among numerous cell targets membrane damage and alteration in cancer cell adhesiveness, an important parameter in cancer metastasis. We have previously shown that hematoporphyrin derivative (HPD)-PDT decreases cancer cell adhesiveness to endothelial cells in vitro and that it reduces the metastatic potential of cells injected into rats. The present study analyzes the influence of PDT in vivo on the metastatic potential of cancers cells and in vitro on the expression of molecules involved in adhesion and in the metastatic process. Photofrin and benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid ring A (BPD) have been evaluated on two colon cancer cell lines obtained from the same cancer [progressive (PROb) and regressive (REGb)] with different metastatic properties. Studies of BPD and Photofrin toxicity and phototoxicity are performed by colorimetric MTT assay on PROb and REGb cells to determine the PDT doses inducing around 25% cell death. Flow cytometry is then used to determine adhesion-molecule expression at the cell surface. ICAM-I, MHC-I, CD44V6 and its lectins (àHt1.3, PNA, SNA and UEA) are studied using cells treated either with BPD (50 ng/ml, 457 nm light, 10 J/cm2) or Photofrin (0.5 microgram/ml, 514 nm light, 25 J/cm2). Changes of metastatic patterns of PROb cells have been assessed by the subcutaneous injection of non-lethally treated BPD or Photofrin cells and counting lung metastases. First, we confirm the metastatic potential reduction induced by PDT with respectively a 71 or 96% decrease of the mean number of metastases (as compared with controls) for PROb cells treated with 50 ng/ml BPD and 10 or 20 J/cm2 irradiation. Concerning Photofrin-PDT-treated cells, we find respectively a 90 or 97% decrease (as compared with controls) of the mean number of metastases for PROb cells treated with 0.5 microgram/ml Photofrin and 25 or 50 J/cm2 irradiation. Then, we observe that CD44V6, its lectins (àHt1.3, PNA, SNA) and MHC-I are significantly decreased (compared with the other molecules tested) in PROb and REGb cells after both BPD and Photofrin PDT treatment. These modifications in adhesion-molecule expression, particularly of CD44V6, can thus account only for part of the decrease in the metastatic potential of PDT-treated cancer cells. Changes in adhesion-molecule expression induced by PDT are only transient, implying that the rate of metastatic reduction is probably not linked simply to these changes.

[1]  C. Evans Cell adhesion and metastasis. , 1992, Cell biology international reports.

[2]  J. Levy,et al.  Preferential uptake of benzoporphyrin derivative by leukemic versus normal cells. , 1990, Leukemia research.

[3]  M. Dellinger Apoptosis or Necrosis Following Photofrin® Photosensitization: Influence of the Incubation Protocol , 1996, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[4]  J. Moan,et al.  Tumor-localizing and photosensitizing properties of the main components of hematoporphyrin derivative. , 1984, Cancer research.

[5]  J. Moan,et al.  Relationship between changes in antigen expression and protein synthesis in human melanoma cells after hyperthermia and photodynamic treatment. , 1988, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  Martin Hofmann,et al.  A new variant of glycoprotein CD44 confers metastatic potential to rat carcinoma cells , 1991, Cell.

[7]  B. McManus,et al.  Overexpression of Bcl‐XL prevents caspase‐3‐mediated activation of DNA fragmentation factor (DFF) produced by treatment with the photochemotherapeutic agent BPD‐MA , 1998, FEBS letters.

[8]  D. Kessel,et al.  Delayed Oxidative Photodamage induced by Photodynamic Therapy , 1996, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[9]  T. Dubbelman,et al.  Decreased expression of HLA class I on ocular melanoma cells following in vitro photodynamic therapy. , 1997, Cancer letters.

[10]  L. Anasagasti,et al.  Photodynamic therapy decreases cancer colonic cell adhesiveness and metastatic potential , 1995, Research in experimental medicine. Zeitschrift fur die gesamte experimentelle Medizin einschliesslich experimenteller Chirurgie.

[11]  J. Levy,et al.  Photodynamic Treatment with Benzoporphyrin Derivative Monoacid Ring A Produces Protein Tyrosine Phosphorylation Events and DNA Fragmentation in Murine P815 Cells , 1998, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[12]  H. C. Robertson,et al.  Hematoporphyrin‐Derivative Fluorescence in Malignant Neoplasms , 1968, Journal of the South Carolina Medical Association.

[13]  C. Elmets,et al.  Inhibition of the high affinity Fc receptor (Fc gamma RI) on human monocytes by porphyrin photosensitization is highly specific and mediated by the generation of superoxide radicals. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[14]  A. Jain,et al.  Photosensitising potency of structural analogues of benzoporphyrin derivative (BPD) in a mouse tumour model. , 1991, British Journal of Cancer.

[15]  D. Dolphin,et al.  In vitro EVALUATION OF PHOTOTOXIC PROPERTIES OF FOUR STRUCTURALLY RELATED BENZOPORPHYRIN DERIVATIVES , 1990, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[16]  H. Friess,et al.  Over‐expression of ICAM‐1, VCAM‐1 and ELAM‐1 might influence tumor progression in colorectal cancer , 1998, International journal of cancer.

[17]  J. Denekamp,et al.  Does local tumour heating im mice influence metastatic spread? , 1982, The British journal of radiology.

[18]  K. Koretz,et al.  Early detachment of colon carcinoma cells during CD95(APO-1/Fas)- mediated apoptosis. I. De-adhesion from hyaluronate by shedding of CD44 , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[19]  A. Girotti,et al.  Singlet oxygen intermediacy in the photodynamic action of membrane-bound hematoporphyrin derivative. , 1987, Cancer letters.

[20]  F. Giancotti,et al.  Integrin-mediated adhesion and signaling in tumorigenesis. , 1994, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[21]  W. T. Chen,et al.  Proteases of cell adhesion proteins in cancer. , 1993, Seminars in cancer biology.

[22]  T. Dubbelman,et al.  Photodynamic effects of hematoporphyrin-derivative on transmembrane transport systems of murine L929 fibroblasts. , 1984, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[23]  R. Straight,et al.  Systemic immunosuppression induced by peritoneal photodynamic therapy. , 1988, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[24]  M. Amiot,et al.  The hematopoietic and epithelial forms of CD44 are distinct polypeptides with different adhesion potentials for hyaluronate‐bearing cells. , 1991, The EMBO journal.

[25]  M. Mareel,et al.  How and when do tumor cells metastasize? , 1993, Critical reviews in oncogenesis.

[26]  J. Carruth,et al.  Photodynamic therapy in the treatment of malignant tumours of the skin and head and neck. , 1989, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[27]  S. Dedhar Integrins and tumor invasion , 1990, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[28]  Monique Martin,et al.  Selection by trypsin of two sublines of rat colon cancer cells forming progressive or regressive tumors , 1983, International journal of cancer.

[29]  B. Zetter,et al.  Adhesion molecules in tumor metastasis. , 1993, Seminars in cancer biology.

[30]  J. Kodama,et al.  CD44 exon v6 correlates with cellular differentiation but not with progression and metastasis of cervical cancer. , 1998, European journal of cancer.

[31]  J. McCaughan Photodynamic therapy of skin and esophageal cancers. , 1990, Cancer investigation.

[32]  A. Ariza,et al.  Differential expression of CD44v6 in metastases of intestinal and diffuse types of gastric carcinoma. , 1998, Journal of clinical pathology.

[33]  J. Levy,et al.  Development of a model to demonstrate photosensitizer‐mediated viral inactivation in blood , 1990, Transfusion.

[34]  M. Burger,et al.  Why do cancer cells metastasize into particular organs? , 1992, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[35]  T J Dougherty,et al.  PHOTOSENSITIZERS: THERAPY AND DETECTION OF MALIGNANT TUMORS , 1987, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[36]  Paola Taroni,et al.  Antitumor immunity induced by photodynamic therapy with aluminum disulfonated phthalocyanines and laser light , 1994, Anti-cancer drugs.

[37]  D. W. Rogers,et al.  Effect of hematoporphyrin derivative on estrogen receptors in the dimethylbenzanthracene‐mammary tumor model , 1987, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[38]  C. Underhill,et al.  The hyaluronate receptor is preferentially expressed on proliferating epithelial cells , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[39]  S. Yoshida,et al.  Changes in intracellular Ca2+ concentrations related to PDT-induced apoptosis in photosensitized human cancer cells. , 1998, Cancer letters.

[40]  T. Patrice,et al.  Modulation of colonic cancer cell adhesiveness by haematoporphyrin derivative photodynamic therapy. , 1994, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[41]  T. Mosmann Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. , 1983, Journal of immunological methods.

[42]  J E Kaufman,et al.  Photoradiation therapy for the treatment of malignant tumors. , 1978, Cancer research.

[43]  M. Kreimer‐Birnbaum,et al.  Modified porphyrins, chlorins, phthalocyanines, and purpurins: second-generation photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. , 1989, Seminars in hematology.

[44]  J. Le Pendu,et al.  Correlation between cell surface oligosaccharides and tissue target-selective adhesion of two rat adenocarcinoma cell lines. , 1990, Invasion & metastasis.

[45]  P. Herrlich,et al.  CD44 splice variants confer metastatic behavior in rats: homologous sequences are expressed in human tumor cell lines. , 1991, Cancer research.

[46]  R. Suzuki,et al.  Production of colony-stimulating factor by tumor cells and the factor-mediated induction of suppressor cells. , 1988, Journal of immunology.

[47]  M. Zeitz,et al.  Decreased expression of CD44 splicing variants in advanced colorectal carcinomas. , 1998, European journal of cancer.

[48]  B. Henderson,et al.  Altered expression of interleukin 6 and interleukin 10 as a result of photodynamic therapy in vivo. , 1997, Cancer research.

[49]  D. Metzger,et al.  ENHANCED SKIN ALLOGRAFT SURVIVAL AFTER PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY: ASSOCIATION WITH LYMPHOCYTE INACTIVATION AND MACROPHAGE STIMULATION1 , 1993, Transplantation.