FlexDex™: A Minimally Invasive Surgical Tool With Enhanced Dexterity and Intuitive Control

This paper presents a new minimally invasive surgical (MIS) tool design paradigm that enables enhanced dexterity, intuitive control, and natural force feedback in a low-cost compact package. The paradigm is based on creating a tool frame that is attached to the surgeon's forearm, making the tool shaft an extension of the latter. Two additional wristlike rotational degrees of freedom (DoF) provided at an end-effector that is located at the end of the tool shaft are manually actuated via a novel parallel-kinematic virtual center mechanism at the tool input. The virtual center mechanism, made possible by the forearm-attached tool frame, creates a virtual two-DoF input joint that is coincident with the surgeon's wrist, allowing the surgeon to rotate his/her hand with respect to his/her forearm freely and naturally. A cable transmission associated with the virtual center mechanism captures the surgeon's wrist rotations and transmits them to the two corresponding end-effector rotations. This physical configuration allows an intuitive and ergonomic one-to-one mapping of the surgeon's forearm and hand motions at the tool input to the end-effector motions at the tool output inside the patient's body. Moreover, a purely mechanical construction ensures low-cost, simple design, and natural force feedback. A functional decomposition of the proposed physical configuration is carried out to identify and design key modules in the system—virtual center mechanism, tool handle and grasping actuation, end-effector and output joint, transmission system, tool frame and shaft, and forearm brace. Development and integration of these modules leads to a proof-of-concept prototype of the new MIS tool, referred to as FlexDex ™ , which is then tested by a focused end-user group to evaluate its performance and obtain feedback for the next stage of technology development.

[1]  D. Nio,et al.  Efficiency of manual versus robotical (Zeus) assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[2]  A. Amodeo,et al.  Robotic laparoscopic surgery: cost and training. , 2009, Minerva urologica e nefrologica = The Italian journal of urology and nephrology.

[3]  Alexandre Krupa,et al.  Achieving high precision laparoscopic manipulation through adaptive force control , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[4]  Andrew B. Mansfield,et al.  FlexDex™: A Minimally Invasive Surgical Tool With Enhanced Dexterity and Intuitive Actuation , 2009 .

[5]  Dmitry Oleynikov,et al.  Ergonomic Laparoscopic Tool Handle Design , 2004 .

[6]  Jason Dumpert,et al.  Natural orifice surgery with an endoluminal mobile robot , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[7]  F. Amato,et al.  A Versatile Mechatronic Tool for Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2006, The First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2006. BioRob 2006..

[8]  S. Warisawa,et al.  Development of High Dexterity Minimally Invasive Surgical System with Augmented Force Feedback Capability , 2004, The First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2006. BioRob 2006..

[9]  Dmitry Oleynikov,et al.  Articulating vs. conventional laparoscopic grasping tools—surgeons’ opinions , 2006 .

[10]  J. Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Development of a 5-DOF force feedback laparoscopic interface for simulation and telesurgery , 2000, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[11]  Kotaro Tadano,et al.  Development of 4-DOFs forceps with force sensing using pneumatic servo system , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[12]  Alexandre Krupa,et al.  Achieving high-precision laparoscopic manipulation through adaptive force control , 2004, Adv. Robotics.

[13]  A Cuschieri,et al.  Technological aspects of minimal access surgery , 1997, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[14]  F. Pirozzi,et al.  Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[15]  D. Meijer,et al.  New ergonomic design criteria for handles of laparoscopic dissection forceps. , 2001, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[16]  Shahram Payandeh,et al.  Task and Motion Analyses in Endoscopic Surgery , 1996, Dynamic Systems and Control.

[17]  Steven D. Wexner,et al.  The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[18]  K. A. Cullen,et al.  Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006. , 2009, National health statistics reports.