Evaluation of biomethane technologies in Europe – Technical concepts under the scope of a Delphi-Survey embedded in a multi-criteria analysis

Methane from biomass is a well suited renewable energy carrier with a wide range of applications. The main technologies for its production out of biomass are biochemical conversion from the upgrading of biogas and thermochemical conversion by gasification and methanation. Presently there exists no methodology to compare the process alternatives for methane production from biomass. This paper investigates a comprehensive evaluation method based on a multi-criteria analysis. Due to the comparable well developed biomethane market in Europe, compared to other regions in the world, the study area was restricted to Europe. The weighting of the different criteria is carried out in two rounds as a pair-to-pair comparison of the criteria by experts from different technology fields in a Delphi-Survey. As a result, the prioritisation can be used to classify the biomass conversion technologies to convert biomass to biomethane. According to the weightings given by experts, the two criteria energy efficiency and production costs are of great importance compared to the other criteria.

[1]  Murray Turoff,et al.  Delphi: A brief look backward and forward , 2011 .

[2]  Daniela Thrän,et al.  Small adaptations, big impacts: Options for an optimized mix of variable renewable energy sources , 2014 .

[3]  Simon Harvey,et al.  Impact of choice of CO2 separation technology on thermo‐economic performance of Bio‐SNG production processes , 2014 .

[4]  Teresa M. Mata,et al.  Prospects of using microalgae for biofuels production: Results of a Delphi study , 2015 .

[5]  Melih Soner Celiktas,et al.  From potential forecast to foresight of Turkey's renewable energy with Delphi approach , 2010 .

[6]  Pasi Rikkonen,et al.  Future prospects of alternative agro-based bioenergy use in Finland—Constructing scenarios with quantitative and qualitative Delphi data , 2009 .

[7]  François Maréchal,et al.  Combined mass and energy integration in process design at the example of membrane-based gas separation systems , 2010, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[8]  Jesper Ahrenfeldt,et al.  Biomass gasification cogeneration , 2011 .

[9]  Reinerus Benders,et al.  The application of power-to-gas, pumped hydro storage and compressed air energy storage in an electricity system at different wind power penetration levels , 2014 .

[10]  Vincenzo Naddeo,et al.  Sustainable power plants: A support tool for the analysis of alternatives , 2014 .

[11]  R. W. Saaty,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used , 1987 .

[12]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  Cristian Dinca,et al.  A multi-criteria approach to evaluate the natural gas energy systems , 2007 .

[14]  Steffen Heidenreich,et al.  New concepts in biomass gasification , 2015 .

[15]  Antonius Broekhuis,et al.  When does decentralized production of biogas and centralized upgrading and injection into the natural gas grid make sense , 2014 .

[16]  Taraneh Sowlati,et al.  A multicriteria approach to evaluate district heating system options , 2010 .

[17]  Persson Tobias,et al.  Biomethane: Status and Factors Affecting Market Development and Trade , 2014 .

[18]  M. Kaltschmitt,et al.  Energie aus Biomasse: Grundlagen, Techniken und Verfahren , 2001 .

[19]  H. Vervaeren,et al.  Techniques for transformation of biogas to biomethane , 2011 .

[20]  T. Saaty,et al.  Fundamentals of the analytic network process — Dependence and feedback in decision-making with a single network , 2004 .

[21]  S. Bunting,et al.  Applying stakeholder Delphi techniques for planning sustainable use of aquatic resources: experiences from upland China, India and Vietnam , 2014 .

[22]  T. Schildhauer,et al.  Production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) from coal and dry biomass - A technology review from 1950 to 2009 , 2010 .

[23]  M. Jentsch,et al.  Optimal Use of Power-to-Gas Energy Storage Systems in an 85% Renewable Energy Scenario , 2014 .

[24]  Qiang Yao,et al.  The selection of key technologies by the silicon photovoltaic industry based on the Delphi method and AHP (analytic hierarchy process): Case study of China , 2014 .

[25]  M. Seiffert,et al.  Biosynthetic Natural Gas , 2013 .

[26]  Naim Afgan,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation of hydrogen system options , 2007 .

[27]  J. Dinwoodie,et al.  Dry bulk shipping flows to 2050: Delphi perceptions of early career specialists , 2014 .

[28]  Alan Pearman,et al.  Model choice in multicriteria decision aid , 1997 .

[29]  Satu Pätäri,et al.  Industry- and company-level factors influencing the development of the forest energy business — insights from a Delphi Study , 2010 .

[30]  Sergio Rubio,et al.  Innovations and trends in meat consumption: an application of the Delphi method in Spain. , 2012, Meat science.

[31]  Michael L. Kent,et al.  A Delphi study of the future of new technology research in public relations , 2014 .

[32]  Ari Jantunen,et al.  Competition in the European electricity markets – outcomes of a Delphi study , 2012 .

[33]  Paavo Pelkonen,et al.  Chinese academic experts' assessment for forest bio-energy development in China , 2010 .