Quantifying the Spring-Like Properties of Ankle-Foot Orthoses (AFOs)

To assess the ability of a specific orthotics stiffness tester to quantify the biomechanical properties of stiffness and energy return of three different ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) designs. Three different posterior leaf spring AFO designs (standard, chevron, carbon fiber) were fabricated in three different sizes and in three different stiffnesses. Efforts were made to standardize the design characteristics across the different styles to ensure uniformity. Each AFO was tested repeatedly with the orthotic stiffness tester. Stiffness was calculated as the average slope of the angle versus moment plot. Energy dissipation was calculated as the area inside the hysteresis loop. The device was found to be repeatable for stiffness, but not for energy storage. Speed did not affect stiffness calculations. Size was significant. Significant differences were found between stiffness categories (flexible, moderate, and stiff). The orthotic stiffness-testing device appears to be appropriate for use in studies that attempt to optimize orthosis-patient stiffness pairings. It is not adequate for assessing energy storage and return. We intend to match stiffness deficits of individual patients with AFOs of appropriate stiffness to normalize the midstance plantarflexor moment. We plan to improve the design of the orthotics tester to better assess the ability of the AFO to assist with power generation at push-off.

[1]  Jon R. Davids,et al.  The Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy , 2005 .

[2]  R S Ross,et al.  A three centre study of the variability of ankle foot orthoses due to fabrication and grade of polypropylene , 2004, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[3]  P Cappa,et al.  A novel device to evaluate the stiffness of ankle-foot orthosis devices. , 2003, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  S Syngellakis,et al.  Assessment of the non-linear behaviour of plastic ankle foot orthoses by the finite element method , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[5]  A. Cosgrove,et al.  The influence of ankle-foot orthoses on gait and energy expenditure in spina bifida. , 2000, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[6]  T. Kepple,et al.  Relative contributions of the lower extremity joint moments to forward progression and support during gait , 1997 .

[7]  Y Suzuki,et al.  Stiffness control in posterior-type plastic ankle-foot orthoses: Effect of ankle trimline Part 2: Orthosis characteristics and orthosis/patient matching , 1996, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[8]  Y Suzuki,et al.  Stiffness control in posterior-type plastic ankle-foot orthoses: Effect of ankle trimline Part 1: A device for measuring ankle moment , 1996, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[9]  S. Simon Gait Analysis, Normal and Pathological Function. , 1993 .

[10]  J. Perry,et al.  The relationship of lower extremity strength and gait parameters in patients with post-polio syndrome. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  R. Brand,et al.  The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly, and pathological , 1992 .

[12]  M G Hullin,et al.  Ankle‐Foot Orthosis Function in Low‐Level Myelomeningocele , 1992, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[13]  J. Hassler The influence of ankle-foot orthoses on gait and energy expenditure in spina bifida. , 2001, Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association.

[14]  S. Õunpuu,et al.  The effects of ankle-foot orthoses on the ankle and knee in persons with myelomeningocele: an evaluation using three-dimensional gait analysis. , 1999, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[15]  M Nagaya,et al.  Shoehorn-type ankle-foot orthoses: prediction of flexibility. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.