Implementation of OR/MS In Government and Industry: A Behavioral Science Perspective

Little attention has been paid by OR/MS researchers to implementations of findings and to implementation as a research topic in itself. A review of the OR/MS literature shows that the field typically ignores human variables, both as components of models and as they affect the implementation of projects. As a result, the success of OR/MS in organizations has been less than originally anticipated. In comparison, the field of Organization Development (OD) places greater emphasis on human variables and on the relationship between the client and “change agent” and has a greater emphasis on applications. OD is weaker than OR/MS in its systems and interdisciplinary orientation. Both fields take for granted the system structure as it is. The success record of OR/MS will be improved by the field retaining its own strengths in comparison to OD, moving closer to OD in its weak areas, and seeking to be aware of power issues which impact on its efforts.

[1]  F. Sagasti.  Management Sciences in an Underdeveloped Country: The Case of Operations Research in Peru , 1972 .

[2]  Albert H. Rubenstein,et al.  Some Organizational Factors Related to the Effectiveness of Management Science Groups in Industry , 1967 .

[3]  Russell L. Ackoff.  Unsuccessful Case Studies and Why , 1960 .

[4]  Larry J. Shuman,et al.  The Role of Operations Research in Regional Health Planning , 1974, Oper. Res..

[5]  R. Walton.  Interpersonal peacemaking : confrontations and third-party consultation , 1969 .

[6]  M. Shakun.  Management Science and Management: Implementing Management Science Via Situational Normativism , 1972 .

[7]  W. Bennis.  Organization Development: Its Nature, Origins, and Prospects , 1969 .

[8]  W. Jack Duncan.  The Researcher and the Manager: A Comparative View of the Need for Mutual Understanding , 1974 .

[9]  Jan H. B. M. Huysmans,et al.  The implementation of operations research , 1970 .

[10]  M. Chesler,et al.  Contemporary Perspectives on Planned Social Change: A Comparison , 1974 .

[11]  C. Argyris.  Management Information Systems: The Challenge to Rationality and Emotionality , 1971 .

[12]  Ilan Vertinsky.  OR/MS Implementation in Valle, Colombia, S. A.: A Profile of a Developing Region , 1972 .

[13]  E. Schein.  Process Consultation : Its Role in Organization Development , 1969 .

[14]  Thomas R. Dyckman.  Management Implementation of Scientific Research: An Attitudinal Study , 1967 .

[15]  A. H. Schainblatt,et al.  The Researcher and The Manager: A Dialectic of Implementation , 1965 .

[16]  Albert H. Rubenstein,et al.  Implementation in Operations Research and R&D in Government and Business Organization , 1970, Oper. Res..

[17]  Letter to the Editor---The Place of Psychology in Operations Research , 1958 .

[18]  Wesley L. Weber,et al.  Manpower Planning in Hierarchical Organizations: A Computer Simulation Approach , 1971 .

[19]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  Scientific Method: Optimizing Applied Research Decisions , 1962 .

[20]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  Some Unsolved Problems in Problem Solving , 1962 .

[21]  A Generalized Lagrange Multiplier Algorithm for Optimum or Near Optimum Production Scheduling , 1972 .

[22]  Glen L. Urban.  Building Models for Decision Makers , 1974 .

[23]  R. D. Neal,et al.  The Relation between Formal Procedures for Pursuing OR/MS Activities and OR/MS Group Success , 1973, Oper. Res..