A practical approach to extracellular vesicle characterization among similar biological samples

We found that the EVs differ in size and light refractive properties which were demonstrated through differences in their light intensity values. The asymmetrical nature of these biological vesicles produces slightly different concentration and size estimates in repeated analyses, but consistent reproducible data measurements can be obtained when several parameters are taken into consideration. In this study, we determined the effects of replicate number, capture time, flow rate and sample dilutions on EV quantification estimates. Individually, each of these factors influences the accuracy and reproducibility of sample readings. These findings have important implications for direct comparisons of samples to assess EV production or depletion. Here we present a practical approach for establishing an EV characterization protocol for anyone wanting to compare EV content among similar biological samples.

[1]  A. Llorente,et al.  Size and concentration analyses of extracellular vesicles by nanoparticle tracking analysis: a variation study , 2017, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[2]  Małgorzata Lekka,et al.  The Methods of Choice for Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) Characterization , 2017, International journal of molecular sciences.

[3]  J. Guck,et al.  Cell nuclei have lower refractive index and mass density than cytoplasm , 2016, Journal of biophotonics.

[4]  J. Gross,et al.  Nanoparticle tracking analysis of particle size and concentration detection in suspensions of polymer and protein samples: Influence of experimental and data evaluation parameters. , 2016, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[5]  Aaron B Krueger,et al.  Characterization of Factors Affecting Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis Results With Synthetic and Protein Nanoparticles. , 2016, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[6]  M. Tong,et al.  Flow speed alters the apparent size and concentration of particles measured using NanoSight nanoparticle tracking analysis. , 2016, Placenta.

[7]  S. Mathivanan,et al.  Focus on Extracellular Vesicles: Introducing the Next Small Big Thing , 2016, International journal of molecular sciences.

[8]  Raymond M. Schiffelers,et al.  Possibilities and limitations of current technologies for quantification of biological extracellular vesicles and synthetic mimics , 2015, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[9]  Andrew F. Hill,et al.  Minimal experimental requirements for definition of extracellular vesicles and their functions: a position statement from the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles , 2014, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[10]  Chris Gardiner,et al.  Extracellular vesicle sizing and enumeration by nanoparticle tracking analysis , 2013, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[11]  M. Peterka,et al.  Evaluation of nanoparticle tracking analysis for total virus particle determination , 2012, Virology Journal.

[12]  Vasco Filipe,et al.  Critical Evaluation of Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) by NanoSight for the Measurement of Nanoparticles and Protein Aggregates , 2010, Pharmaceutical Research.

[13]  David M. Livingston,et al.  A Complex with Chromatin Modifiers That Occupies E2F- and Myc-Responsive Genes in G0 Cells , 2002, Science.