Discrepancy Analysis for Detecting Candidate Parcels Requiring Update of Land Category in Cadastral Map Using Hyperspectral UAV Images: A Case Study in Jeonju, South Korea

The non-spatial information of cadastral maps must be repeatedly updated to monitor recent changes in land property and to detect illegal land registrations by tax evaders. Since non-spatial information, such as land category, is usually updated by field-based surveys, it is time-consuming and only a limited area can be updated at a time. Although land categories can be updated by remote sensing techniques, the update is typically performed through manual analysis, namely through a visually interpreted comparison between the newly generated land information and the existing cadastral maps. A cost-effective, fast alternative to the current surveying methods would improve the efficiency of land management. For this purpose, the present study analyzes the discrepancy between the existing cadastral map and the actual land use. Our proposed method operates in two steps. First, an up-to-date land cover map is generated from hyperspectral unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) images. These images are effectively classified by a hybrid twoand three-dimensional convolutional neural network. Second, a discrepancy map, which contains the ratio of the area that is being used differently from the registered land use in each parcel, is constructed through a three-stage inconsistency comparison. As a case study, the proposed method was evaluated using hyperspectral UAV images acquired at two sites of Jeonju in South Korea. The overall classification accuracies of six land classes at Sites 1 and 2 were 99.93% and 99.75% and those at Sites 1 and 2 are 39.4% and 34.4%, respectively, which had discrepancy ratios of 50% or higher. Finally, discrepancy maps between the land cover maps and existing cadastral maps were generated and visualized. The method automatically reveals the inconsistent parcels requiring updates of their land category. Although the performance of the proposed method depends on the classification results obtained from UAV imagery, the method allows a flexible modification of the matching criteria between the land categories and land coverage. Therefore, it is generalizable to various cadastral systems and the discrepancy ratios will provide practical information and significantly reduce the time and effort for land monitoring and field surveying.

[1]  Dong-Seob Song,et al.  Evaluation of Cadastral Discrepancy and Continuous Cadastral Mapping in Coastal Zone using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle , 2018, Journal of Coastal Research.

[2]  Francesco Carlo Nex,et al.  Using UAVs for map creation and updating. A case study in Rwanda , 2018 .

[3]  Edyta Puniach,et al.  Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for Updating Farmland Cadastral Data in Areas Subject to Landslides , 2018, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[4]  Kamal Jain,et al.  Use of OBIA for extraction of cadastral parcels , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI).

[5]  R. Sivasamy,et al.  Generating cadastral base for Kolathupalayam village in Tamil Nadu from high resolution LISS IV sensor data , 2016 .

[6]  Canqun Yang,et al.  Delay Compensated Asynchronous Adam Algorithm for Deep Neural Networks , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing with Applications and 2017 IEEE International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Communications (ISPA/IUCC).

[7]  Gajendra Sharma,et al.  An Assessment on Cadastral Map Update Technologies in Nepal , 2017 .

[8]  Antonio Plaza,et al.  A new deep convolutional neural network for fast hyperspectral image classification , 2017, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[9]  Miro Govedarica,et al.  Domain model for cadastral systems with land use component , 2019 .

[10]  Elżbieta Jasińska,et al.  DETERMINING THE CADASTRAL-TAX AREAS FOR THE REAL ESTATE PREMISES BASED ON THE MODEL OF QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE , 2017 .

[11]  J. R. Sharma,et al.  Assessing Usefulness of High-Resolution Satellite Imagery (HRSI) for Re-Survey of Cadastral Maps , 2014 .

[12]  Claudio Persello,et al.  Deep Fully Convolutional Networks for Cadastral Boundary Detection from UAV Images , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[13]  H. Eisenbeiss,et al.  Unmanned aerial vehicle in cadastral applications , 2012 .

[14]  Salah Bourennane,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Classification Based on Parameter-Optimized 3D-CNNs Combined with Transfer Learning and Virtual Samples , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[15]  Rohan Bennett,et al.  A procedure for semi-automated cadastral boundary feature extraction from high-resolution satellite imagery , 2018 .

[16]  Wei Li,et al.  Diverse Region-Based CNN for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  K. Venkata Reddy,et al.  Updation of Cadastral Maps Using High Resolution Remotely Sensed Data , 2013 .

[18]  Bidyut Baran Chaudhuri,et al.  HybridSN: Exploring 3-D–2-D CNN Feature Hierarchy for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2019, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[19]  Raymond Y. K. Lau,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Classification With Deep Learning Models , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[20]  Jaap Zevenbergen,et al.  An integrated approach for updating cadastral maps in Pakistan using satellite remote sensing data , 2012, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[21]  Heesung Kwon,et al.  Going Deeper With Contextual CNN for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[22]  Ying Li,et al.  Spectral-Spatial Classification of Hyperspectral Imagery with 3D Convolutional Neural Network , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[23]  Michael Ying Yang,et al.  Review of Automatic Feature Extraction from High-Resolution Optical Sensor Data for UAV-Based Cadastral Mapping , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[24]  Christian Heipke,et al.  Updating geospatial databases from images , 2008 .

[25]  Michael Ying Yang,et al.  Contour Detection for UAV-Based Cadastral Mapping , 2017, Remote. Sens..