Safety and Feasibility of Direct Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Using a Novel Magnetic Resonance Imaging-safe Robotic Device.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate safety and feasibility in a first-in-human trial of a direct magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided prostate biopsy using a novel robotic device. METHODS MrBot is an MRI-safe robotic device constructed entirely with nonconductive, nonmetallic, and nonmagnetic materials and developed by our group. A safety and feasibility clinical trial was designed to assess the safety and feasibility of a direct MRI-guided biopsy with MrBot and to determine its targeting accuracy. Men with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels, prior negative prostate biopsies, and cancer-suspicious regions (CSRs) on MRI were enrolled in the study. Biopsies targeting CSRs, in addition to sextant locations, were performed. RESULTS Five men underwent biopsy with MrBot. Two men required Foley catheter insertion after the procedure, with no other complications or adverse events. Even though this was not a study designed to detect prostate cancer, biopsies confirmed the presence of a clinically significant cancer in 2 patients. On a total of 30 biopsy sites, the robot achieved an MRI-based targeting accuracy of 2.55 mm and a precision of 1.59 mm normal to the needle, with no trajectory corrections and no unsuccessful attempts to target a site. CONCLUSION Robot-assisted MRI-guided prostate biopsy appears safe and feasible. This study confirms that a clinically significant prostate cancer (≥5-mm radius, 0.5 cm3) depicted in MRI may be accurately targeted. Direct confirmation of needle placement in the CSR may present an advantage over fusion-based technology and gives more confidence in a negative biopsy result. Additional study is warranted to evaluate the efficacy of this approach.

[1]  H. Shinmoto,et al.  Prostate cancer screening: The clinical value of diffusion‐weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2‐weighted imaging , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  Stephen B. Solomon,et al.  MRI-Safe Robot for Endorectal Prostate Biopsy , 2014, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[3]  Peter H Gann,et al.  Risk factors for prostate cancer detection after a negative biopsy: a novel multivariable longitudinal approach. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  Ian M Thompson,et al.  Operating characteristics of prostate-specific antigen in men with an initial PSA level of 3.0 ng/ml or lower. , 2005, JAMA.

[5]  D. Stoianovici,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging compatible robotic system for fully automated brachytherapy seed placement. , 2006, Urology.

[6]  B. Carey,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting. , 2011, European urology.

[7]  Yousef Mazaheri,et al.  Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3 T for prostate cancer: tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness. , 2011, Radiology.

[8]  Ruth Etzioni,et al.  Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer. , 2014, European urology.

[9]  S. Nour,et al.  The impact of multiparametric pelvic magnetic resonance imaging on risk stratification in patients with localized prostate cancer. , 2014, Urology.

[10]  H. Haxhimolla,et al.  mp-MRI Prostate Characterised PIRADS 3 Lesions are Associated with a Low Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer - A Retrospective Review of 92 Biopsied PIRADS 3 Lesions , 2015, Current Urology.

[11]  M. Terris Sensitivity and specificity of sextant biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: preliminary report. , 1999, Urology.

[12]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. , 2015, JAMA.

[13]  Gregory S. Chirikjian,et al.  Nonholonomic Modeling of Needle Steering , 2006, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[14]  D. Stoianovici,et al.  Transperineal prostate intervention: robot for fully automated MR imaging--system description and proof of principle in a canine model. , 2008, Radiology.

[15]  P. Carroll,et al.  Operating characteristics of prostate-specific antigen in men with an initial PSA level of 3.0 ng/ml or lower , 2005 .

[16]  S. Weigand,et al.  Acute urinary retention after transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Dan Stoianovici,et al.  Automatic Brachytherapy Seed Placement Under MRI Guidance , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  S. Verma,et al.  The feasibility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for targeted biopsy using novel navigation systems to detect early stage prostate cancer: the preliminary experience. , 2013, Journal of endourology.

[19]  A. Patriciu,et al.  A New Type of Motor: Pneumatic Step Motor , 2007, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[20]  T. Tammela,et al.  Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up , 2014, The Lancet.

[21]  W. Fair,et al.  Incidence and clinical significance of false-negative sextant prostate biopsies. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[22]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted, 3D transrectal ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy for prostate cancer: Quantifying the impact of needle delivery error on diagnosis. , 2014, Medical physics.

[23]  Monish Aron,et al.  3-Dimensional elastic registration system of prostate biopsy location by real-time 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guidance with magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound image fusion. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[24]  Dan Stoianovici,et al.  MR Safe Robot, FDA Clearance, Safety and Feasibility of Prostate Biopsy Clinical Trial , 2017, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[25]  Kemal Tuncali,et al.  Workflow assessment of 3T MRI-guided transperineal targeted prostate biopsy using a robotic needle guidance , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[26]  Paul R Young,et al.  Systematic transperineal ultrasound-guided template biopsy of the prostate: three-year experience. , 2005, Urology.

[27]  L. Salomon,et al.  Risk of repeat biopsy and prostate cancer detection after an initial extended negative biopsy: longitudinal follow‐up from a prospective trial , 2013, BJU international.

[28]  Kazuro Sugimura,et al.  Prostate cancer detection with 3 T MRI: Comparison of diffusion‐weighted imaging and dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in combination with T2‐weighted imaging , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[29]  Alexandru Patriciu,et al.  “MRI Stealth” robot for prostate interventions , 2007, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.